Verdict sorry
Alfa Romeo Giulia QV vs Aston Martin Vanquish
| Category | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 5.9 l V12 | 2.9 l V6 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 576 / 568 | 510 / 503 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 630 / 465 | 601 / 443 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1773 / 3909 | 1703 / 3754 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 325 / 320 | 299 / 295 |
| Average price | €254,000 | €89,000 |
Lap Times
| Track | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| Motortrend Figure-8 | 0:24.40 | 0:24.00 |
| Laguna Seca (post 1988) | 1:40.71 | 1:39.68 |
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.1 s | 3.8 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.3 s | 5.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 8.8 s | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 13.3 s | 11.9 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.0 s | 2.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.4 s | 3.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.6 s | 4.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 9.7 s | 6.6 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.2 s | 8.5 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.6 s | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 13.9 s | 13.8 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 19.5 s | 19.9 s |
| 1/4 mile | 11.9 s @ 121.0 mph | 11.7 s @ 123.1 mph |
Braking distance
| Speed | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| 100 kph - 0 | 32 m (106 ft) | 31 m (101 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 136 m (448 ft) | 126 m (415 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) | 30 m (99 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 46 m (152 ft) | 42 m (138 ft) |
General performance
| Category | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 323 kph (201 mph) | 309 kph (192 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.75 g (7 m/s²) | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
| Fuel economy | 11.2 l/100 km (21 mpg US / 25 UK) | 7.2 l/100 km (33 mpg US / 39 UK) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.97 g (10 m/s²) | 1.17 g (11 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Vanquish | Alfa Romeo Giulia QV |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 96 | 100 |
| Straight line speed | 88 | 100 |
| Overall | 93 | 100 |
Verdict
Giulia QV is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 547 times.
Acceleration graph
Owen 3y ago
The conclusion must be wrong? Surely they’re very similar in performance hence the graph.
