Picture of Nissan GT-R Spec-V (R35)

Nissan GT-R Spec-V (R35)

V6, Twin Turbo
492 ps (485 bhp)
588 Nm (434 lb-ft)
1680 kg (3704 lbs)
293 ps / tonne
Picture of Nissan GT-R (R35)

Nissan GT-R (R35)

V6 twinturbo
480 ps (473 bhp)
587 Nm (433 lb-ft)
1740 kg (3836 lbs)
276 ps / tonne

Performance

  GT-R Spec-VGT-R
Top speed 305 kph (190 mph)314 kph (195 mph)
0 - 100 kph 3.2 s3.4 s
0 - 200 kph 13.3 s12.2 s
0 - 100 mph 8.4 s7.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.6 s @ 94.4 mph7.6 s @ 98.2 mph
1/4 mile 11.0 s @ 125.5 mph11.3 s @ 125.5 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 19.0 s @ 140.4 mph18.8 s @ 144.2 mph
Est. 1 mile 31.9 s @ 162.8 mph31.7 s @ 164.7 mph
Est. 1000 m 22.4 s @ 238.0 kph22.2 s @ 243.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph 10.1 s8.8 s
Est. max acceleration 0.99 g (10 m/s²)0.92 g (9 m/s²)

Summary

  GT-R Spec-VGT-R
Track Performance 295294
Straight line speed 10071056
Total 13021349

Verdict

There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 2.1k times.

More acceleration data at dragrace.me

Acceleration graph

Acceleration chart
User avatar

User avatar

fastest laps  11y ago

!!


User avatar

Lee is dumb  11y ago

JK you're not dumb


User avatar

Lee is dumb  11y ago

btw nissan obviously lied


User avatar

Lee is dumb  11y ago

Thats because the gtr is too shitty to improve (as proven with the spec-v)


User avatar

Lee  11y ago

By the way, bet if Porsche bought a V spec and tried to better Nissan's R35 time of 7.26 around the ring they couldn't do it. Then we can all call porsche sore looses hu?

Know why nissan won't run the V spec around the ring? Becuase it will take another year or two to set it up, mod it up etc etc and may not even be able reach the r35's 7.26 time. Then we can all see what a load of toss Nissan was spinning at us.


User avatar

lee  11y ago

V spec double the price than a GT-R, so the v spec should cop all the " better at half the cost" crap like all that I read when comparing porsche's etc etc.


User avatar

clatrum  11y ago

the gtr has a better gear ratios in a higher gear to achieve 310 kph or 192 mph. gtr vspec achieve 305 kph or 180 mph. and the only difference i see here is nissan configured the gear ratios to achieve a fast start, better than the normal gtr, to do so, they slower the ratio in the higher gears. that 0.3 seconds gained from 0-100 kph or 0-62 mph is because of that extra power from the gear ratios re-configuration. anyway nice effort from nissan.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

Even so, the numbers are not that far off, and even if the spec-v was a second faster in every category, thats alot of pesos for that little change???


User avatar

Georg  11y ago

because it was not realy clocked and claimed...


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

If those stats are correct, why hasnt that 0-124mph/0-200kmh time ben changed to 10.8? just look at the trap speed of the 1/4 mile.


User avatar

BumRush  11y ago

Ok Sorry, My bad, i totally forgot about all that, so its understandable to Forget, sprcially with the pages and pages and pages some of these spammer leave, Especially this current *******..lol


User avatar

Georg  11y ago

you know with all that pointless spamm done by anonymous posters in the message section sometimes important messages get no attiotion..have corrected the number to the numbers shown in the video


User avatar

BumRush  11y ago

So what about the tested numbers i put on the SpecV page?, which i have proven By Video and posted the link?


User avatar

Georg  11y ago

there is a simple reason why the basic is on paper faster, we put the best ever tested numbers of a vehicle online, the basic GT-R was simple much more tested all around the world and here you see only the best numbers reach during the tests. The V-spec isn´t tested widely so far so there are only very limited numbers avaible... if more tests are done the numbers get corrected..


User avatar

BumRush  11y ago

Actually if you have watched GTChannel or Edmunds you can clearly see that the SpecV Out Accelerates the Base GT-R in every category, i believe those times of there for acceleration was donr by Evo Magazine, And Not very good ones to boot. and as far as that Tsukuba time, that SpecV lap was done in the Wet, (I Believe). so stickier tyres better suspension, better brakes, lighter, more tracked tuned, and slower you say? lol...dont think so, even American magazine Road&Track got 7.3 to 100mph as the Base had ben tested to 7.7 to 100mph by Car&driver, If you dont believe me your welcome to look at the link i left on the SpecV page. And this also produces more downforce and grip than the base, and also beats it in the slolom and skidpad, so do you really think it would be slower with all those upgraded materials? and double the price at $160,000 compared to the base's $80,000?, not too mention an eye watering $50,000 set of brakes.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

The Spec V is lighter than the normal GT-R so it is not planted as well and does not have as much grip.

The Spec V does not have launch control which makes it slower on acceleration tests.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

Are you so stupid as to deny the facts that are presented RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU?

LMFAO! I guess you are. "Don't listen to those stats up there." What do you what me to do, make up stats in my head? ROFL! Quit being so ****ing stupid.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

if you really believe the SpecV is slower, than you REALLY are a retard, why would it be slower with everything being much better? point is it IS, dont listen to those stats up there, learn to think for youself, with reason.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

And learn grammar and proper punctuation you ****ing idiot. It should have been:

Well you just saw the stats, what's with the retarded comment?

Quit commenting and kill yourself.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

Quit being such a douchebag and learn to not make stupid comments such as the one above you worthless piece of shit. I was just commenting that it's FUNNY that the Spec V is supposed to be FASTER than the standard GT-R but it's NOT. Grow a pair of balls and get a sense of humor you worthless moron.