Nissan GT-R vs Noble M600

Picture of Nissan GT-R (R35)
Picture of Noble M600
Category Nissan GT-R (R35)Noble M600
Engine layout 3.8 l V64.4 l V8
Max power (ps / bhp) 480 / 473659 / 650
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 587 / 433838 / 618
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1740 / 38361277 / 2815
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 276 / 272516 / 509


Category Nissan GT-R (R35)Noble M600
0 - 100 kph 3.4 s3.2 s
0 - 60 mph 3.3 s3.5 s
0 - 100 mph 7.8 s6.5 s
0 - 150 mph 26.6 s14.0 s
1/4 mile 11.3 s @ 125.5 mph11.0 s @ 131.1 mph
Top speed 314 kph (195 mph)363 kph (226 mph)


Category Nissan GT-R (R35)Noble M600
Track Performance 383390
Straight line speed 413584
Total 796973


M600 is the fastest by a small margin.

This comparison has been viewed 1.6k times.

User avatar

User avatar

mykem  10y ago

There's some huge discrepancy re: Rockingham time. Here's the video of the M600 recorded time:

You can see the rest of Car magazine TT (for its 2009 Performance car of the year) here:

The faster times (with the various cars driven for Autocar test) must've used a different configuration of the track. Rockingham UK (not the one in South Carolina, USA) is an oval track with an infield road course with various configurations:

User avatar

vette  10y ago

i understand that but i think it would make more sense if you erase the higher time!
same goes with the way 96-100kph takes 0.2 seconds!
there are MANY cars with this same problem

User avatar

NIN  10y ago

The 0-60mph is from a different test than the 0-100kph. Whoever tested 0-100kph didn't record a 0-60mph time so there is no data of 0-60 from that test.

Obviously on the day the 0-100kph was recorded, 0-60 mph was quicker but if they didn't put it in the stats, it won't show up here.

User avatar

vette  10y ago

this is so wrong!
how can the 0-60bph be more than o-100 kph?!
and the cars is said to be under 3 through 60! i know that autocar says 3.5 but MAYBE they couldn't put 650bhp on the road properly! just sayin!

User avatar

irmisb   10y ago