BMW M3 vs BMW M3

Picture of BMW M3 (E90)
Picture of BMW M3 (E92)
Category BMW M3 (E90)BMW M3 (E92)
Max power (ps / bhp) 420 / 414420 / 414
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 400 / 295400 / 295
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1658 / 36551618 / 3567
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 253 / 250260 / 256
Auto insurance group 4343


Speed & distance BMW M3 (E90)BMW M3 (E92)
0 - 50 kph 1.9 s1.9 s
0 - 100 kph 4.5 s4.3 s
0 - 160 kph 9.9 s9.9 s
0 - 200 kph 15.6 s15.2 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 11.1 s10.9 s
0 - 60 mph 4.1 s3.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.9 s9.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile 8.9 s @ 96.3 mph8.7 s @ 96.9 mph
1/4 mile 12.7 s12.4 s @ 114.3 mph

General performance

Category BMW M3 (E90)BMW M3 (E92)
Top speed 282 kph (175 mph)280 kph (174 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 16.6 s @ 1398 ft16.2 s @ 1371 ft
Est. max acceleration 0.69 g (7 m/s²)0.72 g (7 m/s²)
Fuel economy 13.0 l/100 km (18 mpg US / 22 UK)13.0 l/100 km (18 mpg US / 22 UK)
100 kph - 0 34 m (113 ft)34 m (111 ft)
200 kph - 0 136 m (446 ft)136 m (445 ft)


Category BMW M3 (E90)BMW M3 (E92)
Track Performance 11731188
Straight line speed 16071698
Total 27802886


There is no clear winner in this comparison.

This comparison has been viewed 3.5k times.

User avatar
User avatar

ali  1m ago

oh can 1 be faster they are the same speed

User avatar

hostboy  1m ago

The sedan beats the coupe on four tracks!
Autozeitung test track
Top Gear Track

User avatar

Mark   10m ago

Seriously, does it matter if the e90 is a bit quicker here and the e92 is quicker there? I have been working on bmw for over 25 years and have been racing bmw in hillclimb series for the same amount of time.
My experience tells me that the tiny difference between the figures is more likely down to atmospheric conditions than any kind of performance difference between the two models

User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

"I would take an Audi any day over a beemer!!! Plus the reliability is better."

You must be a blonde!

User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

I would take an Audi any day over a beemer!!! Plus the reliability is better.

User avatar

MPower  13y ago

George: The coupe is NOT faster than the sedan in a straight line despite it being written here. They both have nearly identical power to weight ratio (look at power/weight columns).

The samething goes for track comparison. The sedan should only be marginally faster than the coupe mostly because it has a stiffer chasis due to the b-pillar than the coupe and is shorter than the coupe making it easier to overcome inertia.

Look for youtube m5boarddotcom video of a race of the sedan with the coupe (from 50 - 260 KM/H). The sedan and coupe were neck and neck all the way uptill 260 KM.

User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

just one more note....about that 5 points.It means something if we compare 50 with 55 points, but here that means 2 percent.

User avatar

George  13y ago

Why 5 points difference means "noticeably" faster?A bit faster isn't more proper sayed?I am really surprise that the sedan is faster on track than the coupe.A difference noticeably enough is in straight line ( for 0-160 and quarter mile).