Top 100 fastest cars from 0 to 60 mph 2020

It's GREEEEEEEEN!!!

Or be it, more vomit-green than Amazonian rain forest green.

I generally trust manufacturers to publish reasonable, realistic data for things like 0-60, top speed etc. In fact, most of the time, manufacturers report conservative (lower than actual) performance data.

If the 1.7 second was measured with something else other than what customers will be receiving when they buy the car, or if the 1.7 second was measured on non-road legal tyres, then I should remove it.

The small indie manufacturers are usually the ones producing suspect data. I guess to grab some free publicity.

P.S. I didn't add the Aspark time, I didn't even add the car. I generally don't bother with indie cars like this. There are so many "real" cars that need to be added and that people will realistically be able to buy and that will realistically get tested by independent sources (aka normal cars).

Well if you trust manufacturers to publish reasonable data eg 0-60 mph or in the case of Euro cars 0-100 km/h then you should do that for the Lambo's, McLaren's and Ferrari. You may think the data i used to compare the P100D vs Huracan is flawed but i'd be more than happy to put up 10K for anyone to prove otherwise which is how confident i am of the figures i produced.

Lamborghini stated on their website that the Huracan would do 0-100 km/h in 3.2 sec and TBH that wasn't far off given they would have tested the acceleration figures on a typical asphalt road which does not have anywhere as much grip as a dragstrip. The best i've seen(VBox verified) was 2.98 secs on public roads. I could go on but the impression i get is that you don't have much belief in what i'm saying even though I know my shit coz i've done a hell of a lot of research but others have got their own opinion regardless of whether it's accurate or not.

.....Those arent sources, There simply car databases that have a mix of Claims n some tests.

.....Dude really?..

Yeah dude really lol
I'll give you just 4 examples on the list ie 10-13 which are all Lambos. On the STREET whether it be with Corsa's or even TrofeoR's the best 0-60 mph time you'll get for a Performante for example will be 2.7-2.8 secs with optimum conditions not 2.3 and yes that includes roll out. Same applies to the other Lambos :)

Here we use stock tested times by magazines or shows, Not potential, And very few cars here have independent strip times, And you do realize that magazine testers are not pro dragsters, Thats a big reason why journalists are much slower round a track then a pro race driver, Same thing goes with acceleration runs, a 2.7, Is only what you think we woulď get from them, The journalists.

Rubbish you don't need to be a pro drag racer when testing acceleration figures for a production car whether it be on the street or strip because most have launch control. Let's compare the Huracan for example, the one owned by Brooks from DragTimes to a SVJ using VBox figures(industry standard) on a prepped dragstrip(optimum traction)

SVJ 0-60 2.81s 0-100 6.05s 1/4 mile 10.59@134.66 mph
Huracan 0-60 2.62s 0-100 6.02 1/4 mile 10.58 @ 130.52 mph

On the street the best 0-60 time Brooks has got in the Huracan is 2.9 secs. What's more the Huracan has a superior launch control to the Aventador's whether it be the SVJ, SV etc. Therefore the acceleration figures you get in magazine's are often inaccurate, particularly the 0-60 mph figures. Do you understand now?

Your right, You dont have to be a pro to test acceleration numbers, But you do in order to get The best numbers out of any car, Any non pro, And pro will tell you that, If anything acceleration numbers from journalists from magazines are more real world, Because they are normal people with limited time with the car on a normal surface, And it doesnt matter if theres launch control, You still have to shift, Pic the right settings, The right load, You can and will still get different numbers, Specially with cars without all that crap, Even a pro on normal tarmac can beat a good driver on a prepped strip, Even when most cars today drive themselves, Do not underestimate the power of skill n experience, And i certainly dont trust those Dragtime ppl, mad suspect..

What so you reckon DragTimes are bullshitting?? That's some of the funniest ludicrous shit i've heard. The fact is that the electronic dragstrip measuring equipment speaks for itself and the 1/4 mile time is easily visible on the timing board which is backed up by the timeslip which is further confirmed by the Vbox and Dragy figures. Pls stop, you're making yourself look stupid!

'If anything acceleration numbers from journalists from magazines are more real world'

last time i checked, spoof auto is the world leader in sandbagging any non-german car :)

You highly misunderstand, Ignorance at it best, Theres a REASON why we dont except acceleration times here from independents on the strip, and Or dragtimes, Doesnt matter if there vbox tested or not, A backed up timeslip means nothing, ANYone can post a time slip, No matter how there car is, do you get it now? You dont believe everything you here do you?.....easter bunny?

All you've done is highlighted to anyone reading this who possesses a modicum of intelligence that you're intellectually challenged. Next you'll be telling me that NHRA, IHRA or European Drag Racing who use the same type of electronic equipment are frauds as well and can't be trusted? bahahaha

Again, You have completely missed my ENTIRE point in what i was saying, On both accounts, Completely, And you call me challenged? Incredible.

You're wrong, yet again. Your point was that "Here we use stock tested times by magazines or shows" and my response was to educate you given my extensive knowledge re what what cars could actually achieve in the REAL world not magazine land. I used Lamborghini(which btw along with Ferrari's are cars give that me a hard on lol) as an example of how flawed the figures were in this list.

There is NO chance in hell that they would do 0-60 in 2.3 or 2.4 secs(stock) regardless of what bullshit mags would have you believe. I gave you incontrovertible examples but that still wasn't good enough for you. I am pedantic and when i see something that is clearly bullshit i call it out, simple :)

That wasnt my point, Just a a saying as to why we dont use other times, And yet you STILL, You missed my actual point.....still..

On another note, Drag strip times arent real world tests, They are prepped with spray and clean tarmac, No mag puts numbers from a strip, MT, CD, AC, All use lots and runways, a rollout only gives you a .2 to .3s advantage, Take that away, And it can be Easily attainable by a seasoned pro with the right applications on normal tarmac, You dont seem to understand the difference between a journalist and a pro, Even in the real world, The pros are getting better numbers, Thats why they are the pros..

I understand, perfectly, the difference between journalists and pros and what you have failed to realise is that the figures FastestLaps has posted in the 0-60 times are actually from mags which is why many of them are bullshit. If a car can only manage 0-60 in 2.6 or 2.8 seconds on a prepped dragstrip with a pro racer there's no chance in hell that it's gonna do 2.3 or 2.4 with a journo on the street or race track, get it?

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Still you miss my main point..

Went straight over your head.....

Anyway, You cannot call the numbers here on FL bs because they achieved them, Even with RO which they have stated and is recognized to be used by alot, There's nothing bs about it, Now if a normal everyday person is launching the car, They wont get those numbers as they are not journalists or pro, As we have the best posted, obv, And i think uour a bit confused about your last sentence, I never stated anything like that.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

@cosimo ha yes it's become obvious that i'm trying to reason with someone whose ego cannot accept that his rationale is totally flawed. He has beaten me with his stupidity so i accept defeat. I have tried to explain why the figures are wrong but he just doesn't get it. In addition to this FastestLaps has been deafeningly quiet during this exchange which i expected lol

But thats the thing you cant seem to get, The figures arent wrong, We only use the best here from reputable sources, Theres nothing flawed about it, Different tests and people produce different results, We all know regular people arent getting the best results, Simply because a vbox says a time from n independant at a strip means nothing, Just that they did it, Not with what or how truthfully.

A 'Reputable' source means everything here, Thats why magazine times are here, Again something you cant seem to get with all your 'Extensive Knowledge'.

Theres no reason for FL to chime in unless he wants to put his own opinion in, Which anyone can do and is welcome to, Or just have a good laugh at you, Or me, Whatever, Thats mostly why people are here, And i dunno what Cosimo has said for the last 2 or so years, My CB2 has made him n his comments completely invisible on my computer, So i cannot se what he has wrote or responded to, But others i can, But it doesnt matter, I got a whole comedy show out of this so im not complaining, Thas why im unfortunetly here after all these years, You believe what you want, IIB, Its all good.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Your descriptions and analogies make me laugh "Russian grannies" lol
I hope FL doesn't share BR2+ views re the disingenuous acceleration figures they post in some mags coz that would be a travesty...

Oh look more evidence to back up my ACCURATE 0-60 mph times for Lambo's, this time the SV 0-60 in 2.9 sec at the 2:16 mark in the vid. This BTW confirms the figures Lamborghini officially release so it's unsurprising :)

Look at the Performante video. It goes to 100 so fast the graphic doesn't even have enough time to slide up (2.3-2.4 seconds).

You can't be serious it is EDITED FFS!!

And?

I just took another look at that particular video of the Performante and it's flawed. Why you may ask? Simple, no stock Performante can accelerate from 0-100mph in 5.2 sec. The most optimum traction you can get is on a prepped dragstrip and i've looked at countless videos of Huracan's including Performante's and the fastest 1/4 mile run is 10.44 seconds@131 mph so far. On that run 0-100 mph took 5.98 sec. Anyway i can see i'm wasting my time trying to convince you or BR2+ coz if you don't consider drag strip times to be valid that's your prerogative.

There could be glitch in that particular gps file but generally that timer and speed are both derived from the same gps data. And it starts from start/finish line (from standstill). Therefore it makes no difference how they edit the video as long as they show the gps timer and gps speed at the same time.

Do you consider data retrieved from a drag strip to be valid?

Not a big fan of it. But some magazines have (or used to have) tested on drag strips.

That's exactly what i have gleaned based on your previous responses or lack of to my accurate claims backed up by sophisticated electronic instruments. I will later explain why certain 0-60 mph or 0-100 km/h figures are not just inaccurate but impossible using incremental times(0-60 and 0-330 feet) on a dragstrip. Like i've said previously one cannot launch a high performance car more quickly on the street or track compared to a prepped dragstrip which let me assure you is akin to walking on sticky glue...

that sv is my all time favorite aventadori, makes the 9-11 beetle sound like a corolla with k&n filter lol

The Demon ran slicks. While the others didn’t. The Demon is a straight line drag car. Put it up against these cars on a curvy road. The Demon will end up in the ditch. It’s made for a straight line run.

Considering there are multiple LMP1 cars and a literal Ferrari F1 car on the list, that really shouldn't matter. It certainly deserves a spot on the list if they're going to put up actual racecars too.

Road cars are only allowed in road legal spec. Race cars are different group, you can ignore them when comparing with road cars. Also, there are only LMP1 and F1 race cars, nothing else, the rest is road-legal cars and bikes.

It didn't run slicks but factory-fitted drag radials that are DOT-approved and can be street-driven.

Does it do sub-2.9 0-60 on normal wheels or do you have to change to some ultra wide drag wheels? :D

Dodge Demon, with Bugatti Chiron and Lamborghini Huracan Performante, are the fastest 0 to 60mph for production cars with combustion engines: 2.3 seconds

The Demon has 315 drag radials all around. They are DOT-approved and therefore are street legal (in North America).

All that hype...n not a single test?......Wonder why...