196ss

Status: Member
Reputation: 5.1k
Last seen: 7 hours ago
Member since: 20.08.13
About: My interests: Classic sportscars
Posts: 646
Activites: 0
Cars or bikes: 42
Avatar picture

Latest activity

11 hours ago 

An issue date/number of the test is needed to add a laptime here.

Don't know for sure, but according to this: https://experien ce.porsche.com/e n/track/events-a nd-services/trai ning-levels-onro ad/precision/Tes tstrecke-Boxberg -Precision-2020 it looks like Handling Course 2 with 9 turns - 1,3 ...

BMW HP4 - 1:27,79 Ducati 1198 Panigale S - 1:28,72 From Autobild July 2013

Nurburgring Nordschleife full (20 810m) - 8:12,62 for previous version: From Autobild Sportscars 11/2007. This one should be a bit ...

As far as I know, it's a race car. There was no street legal version of it.

Wasn't it rear engined? And top speed should be 120 mph not kph.

Romain T-1000

F-type front looked much more interesting before facelift. Now it looks like Audi.

Year passes faster on this site. How about this thread? https://fastestl aps.com/articles /the-genesis-of- fastestlaps-com

It's convertible only in picture, stats and laptimes are for coupe.

@Hoppelmoppel "rear engine, front wheel drive" You did it again...

Auto Motor und Sport 15/2000: Top speed - 331,4 kph

Auto Motor und Sport 22/1984: 0-60 kph - 2,6 sec 0-80 kph - 3,6 sec 0-100 kph - 4,6 sec ...

It's AWD, rear engine.

This laptime makes 600LT absolutely unnecessary.

From Road&Track 09/1954: Curb weight – 1860 lbs Tested weight – 2160 lbs 0-30 mph – 4,3 sec. 0-40 mph ...


2 weeks ago 

added Porsche 356 1500 Super



2 weeks ago 

added Porsche 356 1500



2 weeks ago 

added Porsche 356 1500


2 weeks ago 

In the Car&Driver same day track comparison M3 was only 0,2 seconds slower then 993S despite big power disadvantage. It ...

Is it really only 8 thousand more expensive than the basic Evo??? It's not like a Lamborghini...

Then I have some tests of another Koenigs, faster then this.

You won't be able to link the Lamborghini statement to the top speed. Perfomante has active aero, STO most likely ...

Sport Auto 2/1980: 0-40 kph: 2.0 s 0-60 kph: 2,8 s 0-80 kph: 3,9 s 0-100 kph: 5,4 s 0-120 ...

Sport Auto 2/1980: 0-40 kph: 2.0 s 0-60 kph: 3.3 s 0-80 kph: 4,8 s 0-100 kph: 6.5 s 0-120 ...

Sport Auto (9/1988): 0-40 kph: 2,0 s 0-60 kph: 2,8 s 0-80 kph: 4,0 s 0-100 kph 4,8 s 0-120 ...

From GT Purely Porsche Magazine, April 2006: 0-30 mph – 1,95 sec 0-40 mph – 2,81 sec 0-50 mph – ...

From Car&Driver 09/1999 (US version 240bhp): 0-60 mph – 6,0 sec 0-100 mph – 16,0 sec 0-130 mph – 33,2 ...

From Car&Driver 09/1999 (US version 250bhp): 0-60 mph – 5,6 sec 0-100 mph – 15,0 sec 0-130 mph – 29,9 ...

From Car&Driver 09/1999: 0-60 mph – 6,1 sec 0-100 mph – 14,9 sec 0-130 mph – 29,2 sec ¼ mile ...

From Car&Driver 09/1999: 0-60 mph – 6,5 sec 0-100 mph – 16,5 sec 0-130 mph – 36,8 sec ¼ mile ...

Sport Auto laptimes usually not very good due to the limited time on the track, and the fear of not ...

Looks like this: https://fastestl aps.com/models/p orsche-gt1-evo

School math: E (Perfomante aero efficiency) = F (Perfomante downforce) / D (Perfomante drag) for STO – 1,37 x E=1,53F/(K ...


1 month ago 

added Chevrolet Camaro Turbo 1LE, Brabham BT62 Road Compliant Conversion, laptime for Cadillac ATS-V Coupe, laptime for Honda S2000 (AP1), laptime for Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet (991) and more