Image of Honda NSX

Honda NSX (Mk II) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1737-1780 kg (3829-3924 lbs)
Dimensions 4.47 m (176 in) long, 1.94 m (76 in) wide, 1.21 m (48 in) high
Introduced 2016
Origin country Japan
Average fuel consumption 15.8-9.4 l/100 km (15-25 mpg US / 18-30 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €185,000 - €220,100
Views 61.2k
Submitted by BR2+

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.1 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.7 s
0 - 70 kph2.0 s
0 - 80 kph2.4 s
0 - 90 kph2.8 s
0 - 100 kph3.2 s
0 - 120 kph4.3 s
0 - 130 kph4.7 s
0 - 140 kph5.5 s
0 - 150 kph6.0 s
0 - 160 kph6.7 s
0 - 180 kph8.4 s
0 - 200 kph10.4 s
0 - 220 kph11.5 s
0 - 250 kph20.1 s
0 - 280 kph30.3 s
0 - 30 mph1.2 s
0 - 40 mph1.7 s
0 - 50 mph2.4 s
0 - 60 mph3.0 s
0 - 70 mph3.8 s
0 - 80 mph4.7 s
0 - 90 mph5.6 s
0 - 100 mph6.8 s
0 - 110 mph8.2 s
0 - 120 mph9.7 s
0 - 130 mph11.6 s
0 - 140 mph13.9 s
0 - 150 mph17.0 s
0 - 160 mph21.7 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.8 s @ 105.0 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s @ 127.8 mph
Est. 1/2 mile18.7 s @ 152.9 mph
Est. 1 mile30.8 s @ 175.2 mph
1000 m20.2 s @ 259.5 kph
Honda NSX acceleration graph

Braking distance

100 kph - 031 m (101 ft)
120 kph - 053 m (175 ft)
130 kph - 054 m (176 ft)
180 kph - 0117 m (385 ft)
200 kph - 0124 m (405 ft)
30 mph - 09 m (30 ft)
50 mph - 023 m (76 ft)
60 mph - 029 m (95 ft)
70 mph - 041 m (134 ft)

In-gear acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)2.9 s
60 - 100 kph (5)3.3 s
80 - 120 kph (5)3.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6)3.5 s
80 - 120 kph (7)4.2 s
80 - 120 kph (8)5.0 s
80 - 160 kph (8)12.3 s

Interior noise

Noise @ idle49 dB
Noise @ 50 kph59 dB
Noise @ 100 kph64 dB
Noise @ 130 kph71 dB
Noise @ 160 kph75 dB
Noise @ 180 kph77 dB

General performance

Top speed311 kph (193 mph)
80 - 120 kph1.9 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph2.4 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph7.9 s
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 010.8 s @ 761 ft
Est. max acceleration0.97 g (10 m/s²)
18m slalom72.6 kph (45.1 mph)
36m slalom140.0 kph (87.0 mph)
Lateral acceleration1.06 g (10 m/s²)
Est. emissions235 g/km

Powertrain

Engine type TwinTurbo V6
Displacement 3.5 l (214 ci)
Power 581 ps (573 bhp / 427 kw)
Torque 646 Nm (476 lb-ft)
Power / liter 166 ps (164 hp)
Power / weight 329 ps (325 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 366 Nm (270 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 51 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 15 ps
Transmission 9-Speed DCT
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive
User avatar

User avatar

aaayy  2m ago

The NSX Type R. I think it'll have no motors (for weight savings), a blueprinted and reinforced engine (forged pistons, etc.), higher redline (7500-8500 RPM), bigger turbos, intercooler sprayers and a power output around 600-650 hp. Upgraded transmission shift-times, and maybe even rear wheel steering. I think they'll replace the trunklid, hood, doors, and roof with carbon fiber stripped-down units. I think they'' give it carbon fiber race seats, and remove the infotainment system and sound system. They should also add an active spoiler & splitter and underfloor aerodynamics.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  5m ago

On the picture its an Acura NSX


User avatar

Broly  6m ago

This page says exactly 3.0 seconds for 0-60 but, for anyone who cares, Mat Watson on Carwow said he consistently got **under **3 seconds. He doesnt specify exactly how fast but it is in the 2 second range. Just throwing it out there for anyone who cares.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  6m ago

haters gonna hate :)

 


User avatar

Dieselgate   1y ago

Hey Cosimo, at least it isn't built by BMW.



User avatar

cosimo  3y ago

bowaaahahahahahahahahahahaha

http://www.caradvice.com.au/579238/2017-honda-nsx-only-two-sold-in-oz-so-far/

like i said, discontinue it and bury it next to mr senna, the good ol' days are long gone when jdm tight yo would spark the streets with a new single turbo from greddy or just landed from japan few minutes ago the hks bov and was on the must do upgrade.


User avatar

cosimo  3y ago

underbody lights were special ordered from japan by br2


User avatar

Bryan  3y ago

Acura nsx. Built and manafactured in ohio. Why is it saying japan and honda nsx. Lol ????


User avatar

cosimo  3y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

saxy  3y ago

Discontinue the car? Why would it matter if they are selling the car or not. It's not like you will have it on your shopping list whether it goes 15 seconds faster or slower.

And hey it's only 1 seconds slower than a 650S.


User avatar

cosimo  3y ago

the gtr lapped in 7:38 10 years ago, who exactly is honda going after ? cars from 10 years ago ? lol

it's best if they discontinue it before summer 2017.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  3y ago

nurburgring nordschleife: 7:36
hockenheim short: 1:10.0


User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

Another "L"

 


User avatar

BR2+  3y ago

Either a claim or tested, I wouldt bother putting calculations.


User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

Forget those 3 digits, a BMW 530d's topspeed was 250,000 kph

3 digits are silly either way - even if they are real measurements. I could show 3 digits to all my estimates but it would be nothing but useless noise, since precision of any estimates can never be much greater than 0.1 second. Same goes for real tests, especially those measured by crude GPS systems, such as smartphone apps. Those things are terrible.


User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

I don't know exactly, but it was stated by QR that it's only a calculated data since they've no space or track for such tests.

I was always thinking about that. How the hell do you test supercars with 330+ kph top speeds without something like Nardo or the VW test oval (the infamous "Veyron-drome"). Testing topspeed is also dangerous and quote a hassle (inspecing the cars, tyres, tyre pressures etc.).

They do show oval track layout in the middle of what supposedly is Vairano handling track graphic. But that is waaay to small for any meaningful top speed runs.


User avatar

DeDe  3y ago

I don't know exactly, but it was stated by QR that it's only a calculated data since they've no space or track for such tests. Forget those 3 digits, a BMW 530d's topspeed was 250,000 kph in QR because of its limiter.


User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

How do they calculate? Just power divided by coefficient of drag and limited by gear ratios?

It is impossible to calculate it reliably, yet they publish top speeds with 3 digit precision.

In this NSX test they also listed final gear ratio at 310 kph and top speed as 311 at the same time.

Just by looking at numbers (and not reading anything in Italian) it looks like a real top speed.


User avatar

DeDe  3y ago

We shouldn't use Quattroruote's topspeed, because it's only a calculation, no real measured data...


User avatar

DeDe  3y ago

QR results:
0-60 kph: 1,7 s
0-100 kph: 3,2 s
0-160 kph: 6,7 s
0-200 kph: 10,4 s
400m: 11,0 s (206 kph)
1 km: 20,2 s (260 kph)
Vairano: 1:15,194 min
Tyres: Continental SportContact5


User avatar

FastestLaps  4y ago

1997 Honda Civic is well within reach, if they practice a couple of more laps!


User avatar

Georg  4y ago

2016 Suzuka laptime best motoring driver Gan San time 2:50.07

 



User avatar

cosimo  4y ago

from now on everyone needs to race whenever it starts to rain.

you sure are one hell of a douche bag when it comes to your favorite rice bento box.

i'll be using winter tires for better traction off the line and still won't have to worry about hidden squirrels and moles underground.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

Judging by the gigantic margin the NSX won over the 570S on the wet circuit, I'm guessing this time the car didn't use Trofeos, which is fair. or else the dry circuit times would have been nearly identical.

quite a lot of inconsistencies in this test. the NSX taking longer to brake from 30mph, 50mph, but then suddenly much better at 70...


User avatar

cosimo  4y ago

let me rephrase that for you, more disappointing numbers by the anysex :)))


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

numbers from autocar:

550x800m



User avatar

cosimo  4y ago

i believe its ring time will be as disappointing as the lfa's time.

if i were to spend 200k on a hybrid car with awd, it better do 0-100 in under 3s and 160 under 6s. this car just fails to do what they promised it will do on paper.

it feels outdated already.

550x800m