@mods please add, got it from Road&Track 2008 (8C test, it was the source for 0-100 mph data)
Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1400-1676 kg (3086-3695 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.38 m (172 in) long, 1.89 m (75 in) wide, 1.34 m (53 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.65 m (104 in) |
| Years built | 2008 - 2009 |
| Origin country | Italy |
| Views | 54.3k |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.1 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 5.1 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 6.7 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.3 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 11.4 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 13.3 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 95.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.4 s @ 115.6 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 7.3 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 8.2 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 12.5 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 15.1 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 19.0 s |
| 0 - 230 kph | 21.1 s |
| 1000 m | 23.0 s @ 238.3 kph |
General performance
| Top speed | 306 kph (190 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.02 g (10 m/s²) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 31 m (101 ft) |
| 80 mph - 0 | 60 m (196 ft) |
| Noise @ idle | 55 dB |
| Noise @ 50 mph | 71 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 77 dB |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | V8 |
| Displacement | 4.7 l (287 ci) |
| Power | 450 ps (444 bhp / 331 kw) |
| Torque | 470 Nm (347 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 96 ps (94 hp) |
| Power / weight | 293 ps (289 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 306 Nm (225 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 6-Speed |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
8C Competizione competition
Lello75 2w ago
@FastestLaps please change
V8 90° 32V DOHC (F136 YC)
4691cc
450PS @7000rpm
480nm @4750rpm
Lello75 2w ago
@mods please add Quattroruote 9/2008
Pirelli P Zero Corsa
0-60kph: 2.4s
0-100kph: 4.8s
0-120kph: 6.5s
0-130kph: 7.3s
0-140kph: 8.2s
0-160kph: 9.9s
0-180kph: 12.5s
0-200kph: 15.1s
0-220kph: 19.0s
0-230kph: 21.1s
1/4mile: 12.9s @183kph
1000m: 23s @238.3kph
70-80kph V/VI: 1.9/2.1s
70-100kph V/VI: 5.5/6.7s
70-120 kph V/VI: 8.5/11.5s
70-140kph V/VI: 11.3/15.4s
70-180kph V/VI: 17.3/23.4s
100-0kph: 38.6m
200-0kph: 147.1m
geoffTheGOAT 2w ago
@Lello75 you said once you got a Quattroruote subscription. Do you happen to have road test results for this car? Would appreciate it a lot
Lello75 11m ago
I've made a guide to an excellent car taste, let me know what you think of it.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNdxYxttk/
Lello75 1y ago
Design analysis thoughts.
Pros:
Clean Body
Simple linear Fluid lines
One line used to "build" more areas.
Everything is connected to everything.
Cons:
The car looks a little compressed due to short wheelbase and 3rd volume, however it creates it's own style.
What should i analize next?
jeremyclarkson1 2y ago
@FastestLaps sorry to ask again but please change the main picture to the picture below,
Thanks
Fangio Man 13y ago
"The looks Alone are worth the 115k price tag"
The looks, the beautiful exterior and the sound!
BR2' 13y ago
When the track is THAT wet, between 6-8s is the difference if it were to be dry, Also depending on Drivetrain as a Awd car would take off less, a damp track is about 3-4s difference, but again, drivetrain.
Plus this car isn't known for its handling, its more like a Challenger then a 911.
But wtf buys this car for its handling capabilities? The looks Alone are worth the 115k price tag, id GLADLY Spend that on this ANY day.
Cescano 13y ago
Top gear lap must be wrong, how the hell this 450 hp car could be slower than the Alfa Romeo Brera 2.2 JTS that has just 185 hp? Even with wet circuit this would be impossible
buka 13y ago
just the Best. it has everything: big v8 feeding 450 horses, amazing tech and the body - the God. this car is the true successor of legendary alfa super cars. i wish this car was taken to the track and beat everything. but hell, damned british weather, i believe if the track was dry, this alfa would eat any m3 or 911s.
btw, alfa is going to present the new 4c at geneve. its awesome, though i wish to see a bigger engine there and be a 6c!
w0o0dy 15y ago
@super9man9: most rubbber boats with outboard engine and 50hp would have been faster given the conditions...
Stiff and sharp suspension and a lot of standing water is a bad combo. Even the spider would have done better since its a little lss stiff and much more confidence inspiring. Mind you this is not a trackday car anyway.
SUPER9MAN9 15y ago
This car is so awesome. It is amazing how it was really slow on the top gear track!
haydn 15y ago
there are onley 47 in the uk and iv seen one iv got about 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000 photos on my i pod
o 16y ago
comparing the m3 is a normal car ...
this beauty to rival any super sport!
and then does the same time the 911 Turbo
is a phenomenal car as well as exclusive, only the Italians can not understand!
Anonymous 17y ago
0−¼ mile
12.4 sec
0–100 mph 9.3 sec
roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0108_Alfa8c.pdf
Adam 17y ago
whoop's i made a big time mistake i meant 1.27 would be a more realistic time if this was tested in perfect weather condition's.not the wet sorry about the mistake i was nt wereing my glasses
