| Price in Europe | €162,000 - €179,800 |
| Price in US | $171,586 - $189,386 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1570-1730 kg (3461-3814 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.49 m (177 in) long, 1.94 m (76 in) wide, 1.28 m (50 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.71 m (106 in) |
| Years built | 2021 - 2024 |
| Origin country | United Kingdom |
| Gas mileage | 35.8-9.2 l/100 km (7-26 mpg US / 8-31 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 269 g/km |
| Views | 3.8k |
| Submitted by | fakekillerfour |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 5.4 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 6.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 9.6 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 11.8 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 13.8 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 17.2 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 20.8 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.2 s @ 102.5 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.7 s @ 121.0 mph |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 5.3 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 12.4 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 22.8 s |
| 1000 m | 21.6 s @ 246.0 kph |
| Top speed | 314 kph (195 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.6 s @ 823 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.82 g (8 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 73.8 kph (45.9 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.00 g (10 m/s²) |
| Noise @ idle | 54 dB |
| Noise @ 30 mph | 61 dB |
| Noise @ 50 mph | 66 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 71 dB |
| Engine type | V8 Twin Turbo |
| Displacement | 4.0 l (243 ci / 3982 cc) |
| Power | 535 ps (528 bhp / 393 kw) @ 6000 rpm |
| Tested power | 531 ps (524 bhp) @ 6200 rpm |
| Torque | 685 Nm (505 lb-ft) @ 2000 rpm |
| Tested torque | 681 Nm (502 lbft) @ 3200 rpm |
| Power / liter | 134 ps (133 hp) |
| Power / weight | 326 ps (321 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 417 Nm (308 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 30 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 15 ps |
| Transmission | 8 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
| 100 kph - 0 | 33 m (107 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 126 m (415 ft) |
| 30 mph - 0 | 8 m (27 ft) |
| 50 mph - 0 | 22 m (72 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 42 m (137 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 90 m (294 ft) |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 2.8 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 4.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 4.6 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (8) | 11.9 s |
| 100 - 140 kph | 2.5 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.7 s |
| 5 - 60 mph | 4.1 s |
flt158 1y ago
I agree with you, Jeremy.
Seemingly just 14 were registered in 2024.
Here is a sales graph:
https://www.howmanyleft.co.uk/vehicle/aston_martin_vantage_f1_edition_v8_auto#newreg
I cannot find out how many were made altogether however.
It wasn't really a limited production car. Sorry!
But there was a cutoff point.
I assume the ordinary Vantage coupe is still in production.
Best regards from Flt158
TypeF173 3y ago
Tested: 2023 Aston Martin Vantage F1 Edition
PUBLISHED: MAR 14, 2023
Look at those numbers! Uhm.
"C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.5 sec
100 mph: 7.9 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.7 sec @ 121 mph
130 mph: 13.8 sec
150 mph: 20.8 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.6 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.0 sec
Top Speed (mfr's claim): 195 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 150 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 294 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 1.00 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 17 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 20/18/24 mpg"
Who cares! Look at that fine backside!
flt158 5y ago
Hello, all.
I have read the full 8 page road test of the Aston Martin Vantage F1 Edition during the last 2 days.
It is my opinion the car is not particularly good looking from the front and the back of the car is just plain ugly. But that's only to my eyes.
I wish to thank Hostboy for pointing out to us the major goof by Autocar regarding the 0-120 mph acceleration time when compared to the 1/4 time. How could the car have a quicker time to 120 mph and a slower time to get to 119.3 mph? It just doesn't make sense! Good catch, Hostboy!
And also, the car only has 24 bhp advantage over the standard Vantage model.
Therefore manufacturing the Vantage F1 in the first place is a bit of a waste of time. The car simply needs more horsepower. Let's say about 600 bhp.
If it was me buying I would sooner spend my money on a Mclaren 540C. The latter car is quite a bit quicker better looking and cheaper.
Best regards from Fly 158
flt158 5y ago
Hello, everyone.
I purchased the Autocar magazine last Thursday in County Wexford, Ireland. And I am about to read the test of Aston Martin Vantage F1 Edition Coupe over the next 2 days. My initial thoughts are Autocar's acceleration figures are not that great. But that's Autocar for you!
Safe driving from Flt 158.
hostboy 5y ago
Did anyone read on Autocar about the Aston Martin F1 Edition's 12.2-second quarter-mile time?!
Edit: 0-60 in 3.6, 0-100 in 7.9, 0-110 in 9.6... and a 12.2 (119mph) 1/4-mile time? Doesn't add up.
A Camaro Z/28 from many years ago had the same 1/4-mile results (12.2@118) but with a 4.0 0-60 and 8.8 0-100 with 0-110 somewhere in the mid-10-to-low-11-second range. (Road & Track)
A 427 Cobra S/C from more than 55 years ago did 0-60 in 4.3, 0-100 in 8.8, and 0-110 in 10.6 to get the 12.2 (118) quarter result, and it even reached 0-60 all in first gear! (Car & Driver)
flt158 5y ago
That's a fair point, ChironSS. And I am sorry for your loss of information.
However I have to say that American magazines, such as, Car & Driver and Road & Track are refusing to issue full sets of acceleration figures of fast cars. And I find that deeply infuriating - although I refuse to get annoyed about it anymore. I even sent a number of messages to Car & Driver. But I got nowhere. Thankfully Autocar are very reliable to print these important (to me) figures. European magazines are excellent at issuing kilometre acceleration figures.
Very best regards to you, ChironSS, from Flt 158
British Cars Suck 5y ago
Good to run as a safety car at Silverstone to lineup F1 cars before it overheats and breaks down.
We will soon hear about the big changes that are coming in 2025.
Aston Martyr
