I drove one in 2010 iirc it was very very good but the v10 is superior

Audi R8 4.2 FSI Quattro (Mk I) specs
Price in Europe | €106,900 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1560 kg (3439 lbs) |
Introduced | 2006 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 13.6 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 21 mpg UK) |
Views | 223.2k |
Lap times
Performance
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.4 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.3 s |
0 - 130 kph | 7.7 s |
0 - 180 kph | 13.0 s |
0 - 200 kph | 14.9 s |
1000 m | 23.4 s @ 233.0 kph |
80 - 150 kph (5) | 10.7 s |
80 - 150 kph (6) | 14.5 s |
140 - 200 kph (5) | 10.3 s |
140 - 200 kph (6) | 13.5 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.8 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.9 s |
0 - 100 mph | 9.9 s |
0 - 150 mph | 27.5 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.9 s @ 95.1 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.5 s |
Est. 1/2 mile | 20.6 s @ 140.4 mph |
Est. 1 mile | 33.7 s @ 166.5 mph |
Top speed | 301 kph (187 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) |
Emissions | 320 g/km |
60 mph - 0 | 29 m (96 ft) |

Powertrain specs
Engine type | V8 |
Displacement | 4.2 l (256 ci) |
Power | 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw) @ 7800 rpm |
Torque | 430 Nm (317 lb-ft) @ 6000 rpm |
Power / liter | 100 ps (99 hp) |
Power / weight | 269 ps (266 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 276 Nm (203 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 31 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 20 ps |
Transmission | 6 speed |
Layout | middle engine, all wheel drive |
R8 4.2 FSI Quattro competition


benedekpuskas 9m ago
I like R8s and you can get one of these older V8 versions for less than 40.000 €.
(unfortunately, the V10 models are much more expensive...)


Piorun 8y ago
Very good car here in europe to hunt it in used cars market. Car is few years on sales, and there is possibility to find cars with 30.000-60.000 km droven, with a lot of options on it, and about 30% of sale price.
Mid engined, more fun than traction oriented AWD system, Lambo based, looks and feels like super car.
Ofcourse its risky to buy one of those, but it still in a price of good equiped Audi A3 and other semi-premium cars.
Its more than fast enough in real life. If someone want more speed, i dont know what for it would be on public road?


CaRage 9y ago
Wish it's the fastest car coz its my 5th favourite car ever!!!(actually the 5.2 fsi quattro, not the 4.2)

Julle85 9y ago
@Eryk03
Forget AMS-data, it was 430 ps R8.
Sportautos data is correct. :D
Source:

Julle85 9y ago
Can someone add the Audi R8 E-tron in here?
Not bad time in Nordschleife.

Julle85 10y ago
Change data. 0-60mph 3.9 seconds.
http://www.motortrend.com/features/112_0707_2008_audi_r8/specs.html


c6-09 10y ago
Hungaroring 2:42.30 w
This lap time screws up any comparisons made on this website to other cars. I personally don't think Wet times should be factored in. I guess it is more of a programming issue, but if it is a programming issue, maybe wet times shouldn't be posted?

golf1diesel 11y ago
how the heck R8 V10 broek during the race? it has the lambo engine with an ECU restrictor for RPM..LOL


FastestLaps 12y ago
As I mentioned in my latest article, Audi R8 V10 technically broke down during the race. I don't know whether or not it was running 100% well during time attack before the race. R8 V10 laptime is from time attack because it did not complete a single lap in race.


FastestLaps 12y ago
Incredible Tsukuba laptime for R8 4.2! Faster than V10 and faster than LP-560. Car seems to be ideally suited for the track and the driver did an awesome job as well. It kept up with Shadow GT-R and LP-560 during the whole race.

Georg 12y ago
The Silverstone laptime was done by car magazine in a stock car compare...
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/GTR-vs-911-PDK-vs-R8-vs_190012.htm

Anonymous 12y ago
I herd MotorTrend said this did a 7:54 at The Ring, can anybody confirm this?


Anonymous 12y ago
2:12, why would that laptime have to be done with slicks? its right where it should be.

Anonymous 12y ago
The Silverstone laptime is incorrect. Unless it did it on full slicks. Somebody delete it

phavyarden 12y ago
when i put the "hall of fame" this car apeears 3rd at Kyalami track, and 997 GT3 RS as second, why?




