Audi R8 4.2 FSI Quattro (Mk I) specs

I like R8s and you can get one of these older V8 versions for less than 40.000 €.
(unfortunately, the V10 models are much more expensive...)

Tony Stark car.

new laptime for the R8 on rudskogen, however rudskogen has changed which means your gonna have to chanhe the already existing rudskogen to pre-2012 and create a new one for post-2012

here is a picture of the new layout:

new laptime everyone!

1:43 on rudskogen (norway) driven by tommy rustad

Very good car here in europe to hunt it in used cars market. Car is few years on sales, and there is possibility to find cars with 30.000-60.000 km droven, with a lot of options on it, and about 30% of sale price.

Mid engined, more fun than traction oriented AWD system, Lambo based, looks and feels like super car.

Ofcourse its risky to buy one of those, but it still in a price of good equiped Audi A3 and other semi-premium cars.

Its more than fast enough in real life. If someone want more speed, i dont know what for it would be on public road?

r8 wins f355

Wish it's the fastest car coz its my 5th favourite car ever!!!(actually the 5.2 fsi quattro, not the 4.2)

@Eryk03

Forget AMS-data, it was 430 ps R8.
Sportautos data is correct. :D
Source:

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichstest/audi-r8-gegen-lamborghini-gallardo-superleggera-gen-effekt-1041960.html?show=4

Can someone add the Audi R8 E-tron in here?

Not bad time in Nordschleife.

http://www.audiblog.nl/?p=59752

Change data. 0-60mph 3.9 seconds.

http://www.motortrend.com/features/112_0707_2008_audi_r8/specs.html

@c6-09 true.

Hungaroring 2:42.30 w
This lap time screws up any comparisons made on this website to other cars. I personally don't think Wet times should be factored in. I guess it is more of a programming issue, but if it is a programming issue, maybe wet times shouldn't be posted?

how the heck R8 V10 broek during the race? it has the lambo engine with an ECU restrictor for RPM..LOL

is there anything wrong in silverstone laptime ?

As I mentioned in my latest article, Audi R8 V10 technically broke down during the race. I don't know whether or not it was running 100% well during time attack before the race. R8 V10 laptime is from time attack because it did not complete a single lap in race.

sorry that can´t be right... Hockenheim is a similar short track with the same amount of slow and fast turns and only short straight ... there the V10 owns the V8 with two seconds both cars were equipped there with the same tires.. at no other track the V8 beats the V10

Incredible Tsukuba laptime for R8 4.2! Faster than V10 and faster than LP-560. Car seems to be ideally suited for the track and the driver did an awesome job as well. It kept up with Shadow GT-R and LP-560 during the whole race.

The Silverstone laptime was done by car magazine in a stock car compare...

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/GTR-vs-911-PDK-vs-R8-vs_190012.htm

I herd MotorTrend said this did a 7:54 at The Ring, can anybody confirm this?

There was another laptime recently added that was fake.

2:12, why would that laptime have to be done with slicks? its right where it should be.

The Silverstone laptime is incorrect. Unless it did it on full slicks. Somebody delete it

when i put the "hall of fame" this car apeears 3rd at Kyalami track, and 997 GT3 RS as second, why?

Its an R8 ;D

How the Hell is this faster than the CCX at Bedford Autodrome West Circuit?

thats correct bumrush...someone mixed 0-60mph with 0-100km/h happens daily here at fastestlaps...

No audi, the 4.1 you saw was fro 0-60mph, the 4.4 here is from 0-62mph/0-100kmh.

@ George
the number was 4.1s here before i sayed that !! then some one correct it to 4.4s !! i sayed correct the 4.1 s !!

is it worth $125,000? id say yes!

why they should correct it? Audi officle claims 4.6s for the R8. Exactly the same time you have reached, so Audi claim perfromance numbers the average driver can reach with little practise... the better acceleration times were done by skilled drivers or under better weather/track conditions...