| Price in US | $66,000 - $81,885 |
| Car type | 4-door saloon |
| Curb weight | 1720-1778 kg (3792-3920 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.59 m (181 in) long, 1.82 m (71 in) wide, 1.42 m (56 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.65 m (104 in) |
| Introduced | 2005 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Gas mileage | 16.8-13.0 l/100 km (14-18 mpg US / 17-22 mpg UK) |
| Views | 218k |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.6 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 15.4 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.8 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.3 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.3 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 5.8 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 7.1 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 8.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 10.0 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 12.9 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 15.3 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 29.2 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.9 s @ 95.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.8 s @ 109.7 mph |
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 15.8 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.67 g (7 m/s²) |
| Est. emissions | 320 g/km |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.88 g (9 m/s²) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 37 m (121 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (157 ft) |
| Noise @ idle | 49 dB |
| Noise @ 50 mph | 65 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 68 dB |
| Engine type | V8, 32v |
| Displacement | 4.2 l (256 ci) |
| Power | 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw) @ 7800 rpm |
| Torque | 430 Nm (317 lb-ft) @ 5500 rpm |
| Power / liter | 100 ps (99 hp) |
| Power / weight | 241 ps (238 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 247 Nm (182 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 28 PS per l/100 km |
| Transmission | 6 speed |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
TypeF173 2m ago
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.6 sec
100 mph: 11.1 sec
130 mph: 18.9 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 5.4 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 7.6 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 6.6 sec
1/4 mile: 13.2 sec @ 109 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 155 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.91 g
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a18200959/2007-audi-rs-4-quattro-road-test-review/
Frank Stipler 7y ago
Who is messing with the lap times?
Ring time 8:09 ? Are you mad?
It's 7:58:06 to be exact.
Change the lap time for Nurburgr 7y ago
That 8:09 Ring lap is bullshit.. 7:58 is the time and it's proven by the Frank Stipler !
Put the right Ring time back ! 7y ago
You must put the correct Ring time back..!!!
This is unacceptable!!! 7:58:00..!!!!!
zainster 7y ago
0 to 150 mph achieved in 26.8 secs as tested by Autocar
http://performancecarstats.co.uk/performance-stats/audi/audi-rs4-2006/
CHARMAINE28Dotson 11y ago
If you are willing to buy a house, you will have to get the loan. Moreover, my sister always utilizes a car loan, which occurs to be the most reliable.
enzostradale 12y ago
It is impossible to time in the ring when the E92 M3 is a car faster than the RS4, with a time of 08:05
TheFrank 12y ago
Yeah I'm calling BS on that 7:58 'RING time.
The other 20 lap times are nowhere near as respectable!
I'm sorry but you'd have to be an idiot to believe a stock B7 RS4 can run 7:58 around the 'RING.
Spydrow 13y ago
I think the laptime is very well possible, considering he used P Zero Corsa tires and is a Nordschleife expert!
The time from sportauto is 8:09 and they have no driver that can keep up with Frank on the Ring.
http://www.sportauto-online.de/supertest/audi-rs4-auf-nordschleife-und-hockenheimring-1143297.html
@Keelan
This RS4 doesn't have a biturbo (in fact it has no turbo), that was the 2.7l V6 predecessor :)
NIN 13y ago
@ Rick james Jr...
As Georg mentioned, you have to look at who was driving that 7:58. It was driven by pro race driver Frank Stippler (former factory Audi DTM driver, Nürburgring Endurance race winner). His favorite track is the Nordschleife. He would easily be a few seconds faster than most.
Rick James Jr. 13y ago
I do not believe that 7:58 RING time. Every other track time recorded doesn\'t even come close to eluding this thing is capable of breaking 8 minutes around the RING. The E92 BMW M3 is listed at 8:05 and I\'m sure the M3 is quicker than the Audi. The RS4 would be at 8:10 tops.
Anonymous 13y ago
why didn't the rs4 have the fastest sedan record around the ring for some time it even beat the 2009 cts-v
Anonymous 14y ago
That Ring time should be removed, all evidence is onyl from that picture wuth the blue car, or am i wrong?
Georg 14y ago
R8 northloop time driven by independet car journalist (who hates Audi loves BMW and is a Porsche junky) The RS4 time was driven by Frank Stippler ex DTM Audi race driver (4. place 24hours at the Ring in 2004 on a Abt-Audi-TT-R)...
That is the same different between Nissan GT-R factory laptime of 7:26min and sportauto laptime of 7:36min... it is all about the driver doing the lap
Anonymous 14y ago
Is there actually any hard proof for that 7:58 Nurburgring time except that damn picture? because how the hell doe this beat the R8 Quattro at the Ring when it looses to it on every other track listed? i mean every track, excluding that wet one, even in the damp the R8 beat it at the Top Gear Track, and yet some how on the GreenHell the R8 looses? somthing is not right here.
Apathy 14y ago
"but hey just looka at the Top Gear Track time, its as fast as the more powerfull and lighter and more expensive Gallardo"
Yeah, but it's also two seconds slower than the R8 which was tested on a damp track...
I'm not saying it's impossible or false, it's just hard to swallow.
The RS4 is definitely a great car though.
BumRush 14y ago
I can definetly believe that time, but its hard to believe it beats the 448lbs lighter R8 and 400bhp 6.0L Corvette C6, but hey just looka at the Top Gear Track time, its as fast as the more powerfull and lighter and more expensive Gallardo, but again ya have to account for alot of things. and this is one hell of a good looking car, it may be a bit expensive at $75,000, but its worth it, id get one, but im really not into sedans/saloons:)
