Audi RS4 (B7) specs

Only problem with that, Is there isnt a shred of proof other then an image saying the time, And not even a test, Literally just an image with the RS4 saying just 7:58...

Who is messing with the lap times?
Ring time 8:09 ? Are you mad?
It's 7:58:06 to be exact.

That 8:09 Ring lap is bullshit.. 7:58 is the time and it's proven by the Frank Stipler !

You must put the correct Ring time back..!!!
This is unacceptable!!! 7:58:00..!!!!!

0 to 150 mph achieved in 26.8 secs as tested by Autocar
http://performancecarstats.co.uk/performance-stats/audi/audi-rs4-2006/

where is the 7:58:00 nurburgring laptime by Frank Stipler?

If you are willing to buy a house, you will have to get the loan. Moreover, my sister always utilizes a car loan, which occurs to be the most reliable.

rdgdxj... You need to HAVE a cock to drive one. That counts you out.

This Vairano time is very bad as for RS4. It could 1:20 easly.

It is impossible to time in the ring when the E92 M3 is a car faster than the RS4, with a time of 08:05

Yeah I'm calling BS on that 7:58 'RING time.

The other 20 lap times are nowhere near as respectable!

I'm sorry but you'd have to be an idiot to believe a stock B7 RS4 can run 7:58 around the 'RING.

you need to be a cock to have one

I think the laptime is very well possible, considering he used P Zero Corsa tires and is a Nordschleife expert!
The time from sportauto is 8:09 and they have no driver that can keep up with Frank on the Ring.
http://www.sportauto-online.de/supertest/audi-rs4-auf-nordschleife-und-hockenheimring-1143297.html

@Keelan
This RS4 doesn't have a biturbo (in fact it has no turbo), that was the 2.7l V6 predecessor :)

http://www.rs6.com/showthread.php/7570-Frank-Stippler-quot-7-58-quot-is-no-problem?s=&highlight=758

@ Rick james Jr...

As Georg mentioned, you have to look at who was driving that 7:58. It was driven by pro race driver Frank Stippler (former factory Audi DTM driver, Nürburgring Endurance race winner). His favorite track is the Nordschleife. He would easily be a few seconds faster than most.

I do not believe that 7:58 RING time. Every other track time recorded doesn\'t even come close to eluding this thing is capable of breaking 8 minutes around the RING. The E92 BMW M3 is listed at 8:05 and I\'m sure the M3 is quicker than the Audi. The RS4 would be at 8:10 tops.

why didn't the rs4 have the fastest sedan record around the ring for some time it even beat the 2009 cts-v

Why it couldn't be faster than heavy CTS-V?

That Ring time should be removed, all evidence is onyl from that picture wuth the blue car, or am i wrong?

yes thats true, but is there anything else to gon on except that picture?

R8 northloop time driven by independet car journalist (who hates Audi loves BMW and is a Porsche junky) The RS4 time was driven by Frank Stippler ex DTM Audi race driver (4. place 24hours at the Ring in 2004 on a Abt-Audi-TT-R)...

That is the same different between Nissan GT-R factory laptime of 7:26min and sportauto laptime of 7:36min... it is all about the driver doing the lap

Is there actually any hard proof for that 7:58 Nurburgring time except that damn picture? because how the hell doe this beat the R8 Quattro at the Ring when it looses to it on every other track listed? i mean every track, excluding that wet one, even in the damp the R8 beat it at the Top Gear Track, and yet some how on the GreenHell the R8 looses? somthing is not right here.

This car is the sickest audi.

End of.

http://www.iaudi.info/audi-rs4/

I looked for proof of this time elsewhere, but didn't get any links. Just time lists that had the same time. The thing you posted Wads is just a picture that someone put together on that forum. Does anyone have a link to the magazine article or a web article?

"but hey just looka at the Top Gear Track time, its as fast as the more powerfull and lighter and more expensive Gallardo"

Yeah, but it's also two seconds slower than the R8 which was tested on a damp track...
I'm not saying it's impossible or false, it's just hard to swallow.

The RS4 is definitely a great car though.

No need for the OverPowered RS6 when ya gots this..lol

I can definetly believe that time, but its hard to believe it beats the 448lbs lighter R8 and 400bhp 6.0L Corvette C6, but hey just looka at the Top Gear Track time, its as fast as the more powerfull and lighter and more expensive Gallardo, but again ya have to account for alot of things. and this is one hell of a good looking car, it may be a bit expensive at $75,000, but its worth it, id get one, but im really not into sedans/saloons:)

I've always found the Ring time a little hard to swallow but there is some evidence to support it from a magazine article:

I can agree with that, but you have to consider alot of things though, like driver, conditions and limit, etc, the RS4 could of had much better conditions when they tested it. but i dont really know why, so i guess it is a lil fishy.

How did the RS4 manage a 7:58 around the ring?

An R8 takes 8:04, and somehow the significantly heavier RS4 is 6 seconds quicker? Not to mention how the R8 accelerates quicker, stops shorter, has an arguably better setup (mid engine), and is quicker than the RS4 on every track but the 'ring. The RS4 is also limited to 155, which would hold it back even more around nordschleife.

Something is fishy here IMHO.
I would have to see some hard evidence to believe that...