I add more performance figures for the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Quattro.
Source:
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI quattro (Mk II facelift) specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1265 kg (2789 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.19 m (165 in) long, 1.84 m (73 in) wide, 1.35 m (53 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.47 m (97 in) |
| Introduced | 2010 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Views | 16.8k |
| Submitted by | gt |
Lap times
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| AMS Driving Center Gross Dolln | 1:30.90 |
| Inta | 1:14.61 |
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.7 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.8 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 5.6 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 10.1 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 19.7 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 26.0 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 20.4 s |
| Est. 0 - 60 mph | 5.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 14.1 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.8 s @ 87.0 mph |
| Est. 1/4 mile | 15.4 s @ 106.3 mph |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 23.7 s @ 121.2 mph |
| Top speed | 245 kph (152 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.56 g (6 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Inline-4, Turbocharged, DOHC, 4 Valves per Cyl, VVT, FSI Direct Inject |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci) |
| Power | 211 ps (208 bhp / 155 kw) @ 4300 rpm |
| Torque | 350 Nm (258 lb-ft) @ 1600 rpm |
| Power / liter | 105 ps (104 hp) |
| Power / weight | 167 ps (164 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 277 Nm (204 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 6-Speed S-tronic |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
TT 2.0 TFSI quattro competition
S tronic Gearbox 10y ago
0-100kph in 5.6s is entirely achievable with the S tronic (and quattro), it feels this speed (and quicker) too. A very under-rated car/engine. I know this because I've owned one for a year.
S tronic Gearbox 10y ago
0-100kph is entirely achievable with the S tronic (and quattro), it feels this speed too. A very under-rated car/engine. I know this because I've owned one for a year.
Myklagard 11y ago
The 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X (EU-spec) (291 bhp / 366 Nm). 0-100km/h in 5.5 according to this site. I think that Audi\'s factory claims generally is rather optimistic.
Myklagard 11y ago
0-100 km/h in 5,6 it\'s faster than Ford Focus RS MK II with 305 HP and 440 Nm. and only 0,1 sec slower than a Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X. With all do respect. This is bullshit.
