If you ever feel stupid, remember there are people who think the Audi TT is a sports car.
Audi TT RS Coupe (Mk II) specs
| Price in Europe | €55,800 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1435-1474 kg (3164-3250 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2009 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Gas mileage | 11.6 l/100 km (20 mpg US / 24 mpg UK) |
| Views | 131.8k |
| Submitted by | Georg |
Lap times
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.2 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.9 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 10.8 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 13.0 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 14.9 s |
| 1000 m | 24.0 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.9 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 11.0 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.3 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 28.5 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 98.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.1 s @ 113.1 mph |
| Top speed | 288 kph (179 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.81 g (8 m/s²) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 36 m (118 ft) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | inline 5 DOHC Turbo |
| Displacement | 2.5 l (153 ci) |
| Power | 340 ps (335 bhp / 250 kw) @ 5400 rpm |
| Torque | 440 Nm (325 lb-ft) @ 1600 rpm |
| Power / liter | 136 ps (134 hp) |
| Power / weight | 234 ps (230 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 302 Nm (223 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 29 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 30 ps |
| Transmission | 6 Speed Manual |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
TT RS Coupe competition
Erich 6y ago
The VIR time is for the Grand West layout. There is no "Grand East" or even "East" layout.
Julle85 9y ago
@Eryk03
I add more performance figures for the Audi TT-RS Coupe.
Source:
Julle85 10y ago
@DEDE
Was is das speedomaster :D Stock TT-RS 297km/h.
Julle85 10y ago
Why this site doesent work any more??
Viking 10y ago
Man you guys almost made me spill my California Sauvignon Blanc I laughed so hard at the comments. So much passion on a car website. Very amusing however. You are so right Apathy. Oh yeah, we are on the Audi TT-RS page so I guess I should make a comment on it. Cool car, slightly over priced (I can't afford it nowadays). There, much better.
NIN 10y ago
It is IMPOSSIBLE to have a different page for every possible configuration. Take the best and move on.
I don't understand why people complain about "OMG!!! It's 15lbs heavier than the stats have listed!!!".
As long as the car is tested by a good source and people don't confuse 0-60mph and 0-100kph, etc., what is the problem?
Oh, I get it...It's just a case of "The car I like was tested to be .0001 sec slower so there must be a problem."
Apathy 10y ago
Don't you get it yet Georg?
If it's American car or an Audi then some great wrong must have been committed by the car for it to be quick. The car isn't actually good or better than anything else.
I kid, I kid. There are members on here that hate certain cars because of their infatuation with other ones. Once you learn who they are, you need to just ignore their comments. It's not like anything they say is ever going to really effect FL.
Georg 10y ago
Whats this BULLSHIT talking about manipulating datasheets that Audi looks better?
NO ONE ever complained about the fact that we only have ONE Porsche 997 Turbo datasheet using datas for PDK and stick shift... mixing data from both versions and to make it even more worse with Sport Chrono pack...
No ONE complains that we do not have seperated datasheets for BMW M3 manual and M3 DKG datas from both are mixed at one datasheet.
That does count for nearly EVERY car added to the fastestlap database that which is avaible as manual and dual clutch
No one complains about that fact that we only use one datasheet for one car (example Camaro SS) were there is even a big power different between the manual and automatic...
it is amazing that the haters only show up there were their fanboyism get hurt to cray around loud
Julle85 10y ago
Stock Audi TT-RS hits 0-100km/h 3.7 seconds.
