BMW M2 CS (G87) specs

@geoffTheGOAT Guido Naumann told me that a retest with Trofeo RS should come 😀

https://www.petersen.org/events/bmw-cruise-in-2026

M4 GTS?

@mods please add
0-100 3.8s
100-200 7.1s
200-300 38.1
1/4 mile: 11.6s@202.7kph

@FastestLaps can you fix the comparisions

Why does this M2 look like 💩?

@FastestLaps please undo those comparisons

@mods please add
0-60: 3.6s
¼mile: 11.4s
https://youtu.be/W8_IXBS6bHg?si=uWOuQe17P2N0_TYF

I'm getting one next year.

This does not come in a manual, BMW explained too.

Cayman GT4 RS did an 11.5 and the M2 CS an 11.6

Tests should arrive soon

Sometime ago i thought that the M2 was the closest thing to Alfa Romeo's and in general the Italian car stereotipe.
Lightweight, not too powerful, sharp and driver focused.
Now the most track M2 weights in at 1710kg, around the same of the Giulia QV, and it has become more like a muscle car.
I guess now the closest i can imagine is an Emira or a 911, but those are more SuperCar ish.

@humana BMW gives numbers in Metric HP, which is PS. So please change power to 530PS and add consumption and price.

Fast and low-key

@mods please add the 100-200: 7.9s
I sent a picture a while ago

Silence is golden. No waffling.
298 kmh = 185 mph.
Great video!
Thank you, Nazca.

Safe driving from Flt158.

absolutely the best modern M car.

BMW our car only weighs: 1710 kg

Passenger takes delivery and finds out it weighs 1780 kg

This is the first BMW 2 Series that’s heavier than a early model Aventador LP700.

If they gave it the same treatment as the M4 CSL (200kg lighter) then I'd maybe understand why it's so expensive. But at this point it's still too heavy

@FastestLaps @mods please add

I would not be surprised if it would beat a last gen AMG GTS on many performance metrics. quoted 532hp will probably be like 580-600hp. For $100k, that sounds like a great deal, as long as you're ok with the look of the car.

Can someone fix the Competition? ehy does this compete with hypercars?
@FastestLaps

BMW M2 CS

BMW M2 CS

Design Analisis of the 2026 BMW M2 CS.
The car has a very boxy body, caratterized by very "Deep" 3D design details. The proprtions are good on the front end, except for those two lateral boxy air intakes. Moving on to the side view, the hood is too long to the eye, but the A-Pillar points straight to the center of the wheels wich is a great thing, the wheel arches have this flat final part wich isnt really good looking but contributes to the continuation of the 3D design elements. The front wheels are perfectly big but the rears are a tad bit bigger. Moving on to the rear, we find a very rare fluid line, connecting the headlights (and in the side view the lateral blinkers) passing by the ducktail, wich points up. The backlights and headlights are very static, conmected by a line that looks like it was made with a ruler. The rear diffuser is too "cheap" or more undefined if you will, it shows huge 90° Angles wich are a punch in the eye. There are some volumes that are great, like the ducktail and others that could be better, like the side indicator housing.

Pros:
- Aggressive.
- Decent Proportions.
- Great Rim Design.

Cons:
- Overall Boxy design launguage.
- Too many harsh angles.
- Heavy looking body parts.
- Too sharp lines.
- Too many static lines.
- Prestige gap is too big for a C-Segment.

Rating:
Techincal Rating: 6.2/10
Personal Rating: 5/10

Opinions?
*Green is used for good parts, yellow for "meh" parts and red for ugly parts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=zm--rBONtKE

They should have played more with the looks, the ducktail is cool but its not wll integrated, all elements on the back point down or at the center and the ducktail is the only one pointing up, disturbing the armony (wich was arleady almost unexistent). They did nothing on the front end and left those huge square front fenders. Still very ugly.

Insanely fast for a "compact" car