BMW M2 (F87) specs

Best looking BMW in my opinion.

manuals are definitely dying

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

i like how on most tracks the m2 is quicker than the normal m4. https://www.motor1.com/news/239158/bmw-m2-competition-specs-leak/ its heavier but more powerful

0-100: 4.1 s
0-130: 6.4 s
1/4 mile: 12.44 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/39711971305/

Top gear track ~ 1:20?
http://www.topgear.com/videos/top-gear-tv/ride-onboard-stig-bmw-m2

Torque is 500 Nm.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M2#Technische_Daten

Could you add the curb weight of 3415 lbs 1549 kg
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2016-bmw-m2-full-test-review

AutoBild Sportscars published 4.2 in their January 2017 comparison with Audi TT RS.

0-100 is not 4.2s. Its 4.3 sec

look at:
http://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=1537250&stc=1&d=1480953010

and

http://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1263410

So your saying it should rival a hatchback and an estate car?....lol

Either way, Just take the rivals listed as nothing, most of the time it will put its rival as a newer car added, Not the best system.

Why is in "m2 rivals" overpowered engines and larger cars as a Ferrari super car, and not Audi rs3 or rs4?

So awesome! Both are the same speed.

Specs and lap times by EVO
http://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1263410

The M240i just has a reworked version of the 6 cyl turbo. Same chassis & setup. It won't be able to touch the M2, let alone see where it's gone.

The M240i is just a m235i with 15 more HP. It's still a noticable difference from that and the 375PS M2. The M2 was seconds faster around the track than the m235i. And I don't think the m240i will be able to make too much ground unless the car is totally redesigned

I dont think so, It's a different car, It's still a 2 series but different, It's more of an alternative if said buyer can't afford the M2, alike how a GrandSport is to ZO6 or an S5 to an RS5, An theres always alternatives to the alternatives

Yeah I know. Didn't bmw kind of shoot themselves in the foot by making the m240i .1 second slower to 60 than the M2? Idk to me it's weird

............They just introduced the car...

With the M240i being announced they need to update this car ASAP

Also tested braking 100mph - 0mph = 91.4m

Evo magazine tested the below

0 - 60 - 4.3 seconds
0 - 70 - 5.4 seconds
0 - 80 - 6.7 seconds
0 - 90 - 8.2 seconds
0 - 100 - 9.9. seconds
0 - 110 - 12 seconds
0 - 120 - 14.5 seconds
0 - 130 - 17.7 seconds
0 - 140 - 21.7 seconds

All in mph, source Evo Magazine

I dont agree with the rivals listed... ???

The Willow Springs laptime should be deleted since it was a "Pre-Production" model.

1:40.88 around laguna seca

Will add them. Seems like they clocked the best 0-100 for M2 so far.

Why times from Autozeitung 7/2016 aren't added?
0-100 in 4.2 and 0-200 in 14.9
here is scan also
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/25649738585/in/photostream/

But then the last M3 with 414hp did 0-60 in 4.1s. This having more torque and weighing less would have easily topped that if it really did have over 410

Times can be stopped:
LOL Really mate?...

On another note, Guarantee this car has over 410Bhp...It is a Bmw after all

Times can be stopped:
km/h
0-100: 4,65
0-160: 9,68
0-180: 12,14
0-200: 15,34