m2 is heavy german junk
BMW M2 (F87) specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1560-1595 kg (3439-3516 lbs) |
| Power / weight | 238 ps (234 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 317 Nm (234 lb-ft) / t |
| Introduced | 2016 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Average fuel consumption | 17.0-10.2 l/100 km (14-23 mpg US / 17-28 mpg UK) |
| Price in Europe | €57,000 - €76,145 |
| Price in US | $52,695 - $54,795 |
| Noise @ idle | 45 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 59 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 68 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 69 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 72 dB |
| Noise @ 160 kph | 74 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 72 dB |
| Views | 81.4k |
| Submitted by | jockysteer |
Performance
| Top speed | 280 kph (174 mph) |
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 5.7 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.4 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 14.8 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 20.2 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 29.6 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.6 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 5.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 6.7 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 12.0 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 14.5 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 17.7 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 21.7 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 27.0 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.6 s @ 90.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.5 s |
| 1000 m | 22.9 s @ 232.0 kph |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.3 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 4.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 7.5 s |
| 80 - 150 kph (5) | 8.7 s |
| 80 - 150 kph (6) | 10.5 s |
| 140 - 200 kph (5) | 9.0 s |
| 140 - 200 kph (6) | 11.5 s |
| 100 - 140 kph | 3.2 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 11.3 s |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 14.9 s @ 1224 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.72 g (7 m/s²) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 32 m (105 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 56 m (183 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 119 m (390 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 127 m (416 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 33 m (107 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (159 ft) |
| 18m slalom | 69.3 kph (43.1 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.01 g (10 m/s²) |
| Emissions | 185 g/km |
Powertrain
| Engine type | 3.0-litre turbocharged straight six |
| Displacement | 3.0 l (183 ci) |
| Power | 375 ps (370 bhp / 276 kw) @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque | 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) @ 1400 rpm |
| Power / liter | 125 ps (123 hp) |
| Efficiency | 31 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 29 ps |
| Transmission | 6-speed manual, 7-speed DCT |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Laptimes
Monolith29 1y ago
i like how on most tracks the m2 is quicker than the normal m4. https://www.motor1.com/news/239158/bmw-m2-competition-specs-leak/ its heavier but more powerful
Inline 6 rules 1y ago
0-100: 4.1 s
0-130: 6.4 s
1/4 mile: 12.44 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/39711971305/
saxy 3y ago
Top gear track ~ 1:20?
http://www.topgear.com/videos/top-gear-tv/ride-onboard-stig-bmw-m2
tyler 3y ago
Could you add the curb weight of 3415 lbs 1549 kg
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2016-bmw-m2-full-test-review
FastestLaps 3y ago
AutoBild Sportscars published 4.2 in their January 2017 comparison with Audi TT RS.
Larry 3y ago
0-100 is not 4.2s. Its 4.3 sec
look at:
http://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=1537250&stc=1&d=1480953010
and
epistomai 3y ago
Why is in "m2 rivals" overpowered engines and larger cars as a Ferrari super car, and not Audi rs3 or rs4?
Davis 3y ago
Specs and lap times by EVO
http://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1263410
jockysteer 3y ago
The M240i just has a reworked version of the 6 cyl turbo. Same chassis & setup. It won't be able to touch the M2, let alone see where it's gone.
Guest 3y ago
Yeah I know. Didn't bmw kind of shoot themselves in the foot by making the m240i .1 second slower to 60 than the M2? Idk to me it's weird
jockysteer 3y ago
Evo magazine tested the below
0 - 60 - 4.3 seconds
0 - 70 - 5.4 seconds
0 - 80 - 6.7 seconds
0 - 90 - 8.2 seconds
0 - 100 - 9.9. seconds
0 - 110 - 12 seconds
0 - 120 - 14.5 seconds
0 - 130 - 17.7 seconds
0 - 140 - 21.7 seconds
All in mph, source Evo Magazine
rhs1992 4y ago
Why times from Autozeitung 7/2016 aren't added?
0-100 in 4.2 and 0-200 in 14.9
here is scan also
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/25649738585/in/photostream/
FastestLaps 4y ago
Those times are already added. Some of them (0-100 and 0-200) are not best times, so better ones are shown instead.
Rick 4y ago
Why dont you change the acceleration times?
km/h
0-100: 4,5
0-160: 10,0
0-180: 12,7
0-200: 16,3
http://www.motor-talk.de/bilder/wir-warten-auf-den-m2-g73247285/image-i208365622.html
Times are from the magazine "sportauto".
