A flying BMW 240i at the Nurb :P
BMW M240i specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1578-1590 kg (3479-3505 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2016 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Average fuel consumption | 10.3 l/100 km (23 mpg US / 27 mpg UK) |
| Price in Europe | €45,400 - €58,200 |
| Views | 26.3k |
| Submitted by | FastestLaps |
Laptimes
Acceleration
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.9 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.9 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 10.1 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 16.2 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.9 s @ 95.1 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.9 s |
In-gear acceleration
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 2.9 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 3.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.2 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (8) | 10.0 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 7.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 8.8 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 11.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (7) | 14.7 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (8) | 21.0 s |
General performance
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.2 s |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 17.5 s @ 1496 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.74 g (7 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 69.8 kph (43.4 mph) |
| Est. emissions | 246 g/km |
| 100 kph - 0 | 32 m (106 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 142 m (467 ft) |
Powertrain
| Engine type | Inline 6 turbo |
| Displacement | 3.0 l (183 ci / 2998 cc) |
| Power | 340 ps (335 bhp / 250 kw) @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) @ 1520 rpm |
| Power / liter | 113 ps (112 hp) |
| Power / weight | 215 ps (213 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 317 Nm (234 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 33 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 34 ps |
| Transmission | 8 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
BR2+ 3y ago
Thats why you get the manual. Plus it really only has a similar 0-60 time, After that its all downhill for the 240, Plus i wouldnt say it keeps up, Power isnt cohesive when talking bout 0-60 times, But considering it also does 12, And we all know this is pushing way more then 335bhp, Either way its still impressive, But it doesnt keep up with an E60 M5.
FastestLaps 3y ago
And much better automatic gearbox. Much faster and with lower friction losses. SMG was total garbage - dark ages of "flappy paddle" gearboxes.
FastestLaps 3y ago
Interesting how it keeps up with the 500 hp V10 E60 M5 up until ~130 kph (see the graph).
Bobb 3y ago
Good to finally see a page for this one. Slower than an m235i? Must have been a bad day. I'd like to read the mag it came from, if you could post a link. I'm thinking of getting one.
