BMW M3 Competition Package (E92) specs

Been trying to find a spoiler with that profile for better Aero. Any clues fellas?

The Turner motorsport version is slightly outside of optimal specs.

So far.

I want to do something similar in this video to my E92 M3, apparently you can get rid of a whole heap of drag and lift and actually generate some downforce with a simple front splitter and a slightly larger rear spoiler.

I've already removed close to 100kg of mass from the vehicle so making it more aerodynamic and efficient is on my to do list.

https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2010-audi-rs-5-vs-2011-bmw-m3-vs-2011-cadillac-cts-v-

Motor Trend got 0-100 mph in 9.1 seconds, 0-110 mph in 11.4 seconds and 0-120 mph in 13.9 seconds

when bmw's m division was at its prime

Track-maintenance? Couldn't they test it another day? Cause that's just not democratic. I guess if it was driven in ideal conditions, it would be capable to do the time in 8:00, or even a bit less.

8:23 at the Nordschleife Full? Sounds too slow for such a car, and for the TT RS - also could be better. Who drove cars? Horst von Saurma? LOL

Actually it is a very good laptime, considering that they had to slow down twice to 30 km/h because of track-maintenance. ;)

8:23 at the Nordschleife Full? Sounds too slow for such a car, and for the TT RS - also could be better. Who drove cars? Horst von Saurma? LOL

Nordschleife(full lap) 8:23

by Autobild sportcar 2/2012

There Top Magazine/s count it, we do to, regardless of the testing methods. Fastest Zero-60Mph, is 4.0s flat without that method, but whatever is used will get published with the fastest time. so 3.9s to 60, n 4.2s to 100, meh, it all works out.

Where is source in Honckenheim laptime?

Not sure, US mag C&D got 3.9s to 60mph, so 4.2 is pretty accurate, the 4.2s could be just a guess based on the 0-60.

But that 0-60mph time is with 1-ft-rollout, so we should add 0,2-0,3 s to get the real 0-60-time.
4,2 s 0-60mph is 4,4 s 0-100 kph.

Not sure, US mag C&D got 3.9s to 60mph, so 4.2 is pretty accurate, the 4.2s could be just a guess based on the 0-60.

What is the source of 0-100 kph?
The best I've seen so far is 4,4 s measured by AutoBild Sportscars.
Anyone?

Power is 309 kw/420PS.

can someone block ryo?

ryo fek off

how come the c63 amg black is 10 seconds faster on nurbring gp ?!

Semi-slicks, 97-more-hp, different driver.

how come the c63 amg black is 10 seconds faster on nurbring gp ?!

@FastestLaps, I've sent updated times with the Car and Driver reference. Now will you update?
Also, the E63 AMG Performance Package has estimates from an US magazine, not real times.

No, I did not. It was Car and Driver, US magazine, with this PDF link: http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/original/application/11b0e54abe3c786ee5f44aaf8a28559a.pdf . I did not forget to attach a link, I always remember. Please, take a look and update the corresponding times or validate the ones I've sent.

@FadeToBlack Most likely you forgot to provide references to source where youre performance data was published.

Why doesn't someone updated the times for this car? I've sent a few performance times and the times haven't been updated.

It has 309kW/420PS. Please correct it!