BMW M3 (E90) specs

0-60 4.1
0-100 9.8
0-150 24.9
1/4 mile 12.6 @113mph
.caranddriver.com/reviews/2008-bmw-m3-sedan-short-take-road-test

Doesn't sound as good as the E90 for sure, but still sounds better than the 911 Turbos driving near it lol.

the new m3 4door, looks and sounds a bit disappointing if you ask me.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36CbcTMsx70&feature=g-all-u&context=G271ddb8FAAAAAAAABAA

Top Speed test.
282 km/h GPS confirmed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9_9ZHMKYxxQ#!

I think that the M3 e90 is one of the best sport´s sedan in the world.

@Rick

You can add 0-60. We used to list only 0-100 kph but now we allow 0-60 as well!

Click on "Add performance figure" and go from there.

Why is it that 1/4 mile times / MPH are accepted as legit but not 0-60mph times?

For the power to weight ratio you use [quote]bhp / tonne but for weight distribution you use standard weight in as it is in the U.S.

For engine power you use both and for max speed you use both

Why not use both 0-60mph and 0-100kph? Why the double standard?

It\'s odd how the M3 E92 Coupe is like 3K more than the sedan although it doesn\'t perform or even look any better. I\'d get the M3 E90 sedan over the Coupe and any other 55-70k sports sedan / coupe.

http://www.file-upload.net/download-2897013/20101017164329262_0002.pdf.html

0-100: 4,5
0-160: 9,9
0-200: 15,6
0-250: 28,8

0-400m: 12,67

Sachsenring time is with Comp. Pak.

http://www.file-upload.net/download-2897006/20101017164329262_0001.pdf.html

I'll take the B7 RS4 over the C63 AMG & E90/92 M3 personally.

why is m3 sedan allways faster on track than m3 coupe, i know m3 is faster in straight line ?

I think that is something wrong regarding the time for autozeitung. faster than both R8, faster than many ferrari's, porsche, lamborghini corvette and also fastest with around 1,5 sec compared with M3 e92 wich is abnormal. did anyone double check it?
something is incorect.

anonymous you forget the better the handling of the m5,c63,rs4,gallardo and brake s.

Id take the C63 over the M3 4 Door, but definetly Not over the coupe.

No i think it would be better to buy an m3 the m3 has better brake's suspension and sharper handling than the c63 amg.

Apparently not, but hey just get a C63 for the same price:)

and 414 bhp isnt enough? lol

The M3 and M5 are statement cars for BMW as they make no sportscars and i wish they listened to guys like us as i to would have twin turboed this SOB. Who cares how smooth a sedan is when we want POWER to make a statement.

I'll take a 2003 M5, and twin turbo charge it. These new BMWs are sooo ugly. :-/

ok thanks, here ya go for the stats tested by C&D..

http://www.caranddriver.com/buying_guide/bmw/m3/2008_bmw_m3_sedan/2008_bmw_m3_sedan_short_take_road_test+page-3.html

I banned him again just in case. And if theres a source for the 12.6 quarter we can update the info.....

Can anybody confirm that this is the REAL DumbAss Adam? or just some DipShit prettending to be him??

12.6 as a matter of fact!!

come on if the m3 e92 coupe doess the 1/4mile in 12.5sec then the m3 e90 sedan could probably do the 1/4mile alot faster than 13.19sec i think most of you will find that the m3 e90 sedan is only all it till bit hevier than the m3 e92 coupe and the m3 e90 sedan match's the coupe's performance.

No offense but yall europeans Find/Do some shitty ass 1/4 mile times..lol againg No Offence, Im Australian .

m3 sedan faster than m3 coupe what's next evo 9 faster than evo 10.are some car manfufactor;s failing to make their car's better then their predeccesor's and i think some car manufactor's are failing to make special performance model's faster than standard model's.

Scan super test of BMW M3 E-90 420ps at Inta Circuit ( Automovil magazine):

http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=907646

I think that M3 E90 Sedan its fast than the E92 Coupé....
Other surprises: 997 GT3 fast than 997 GT3 RS,Gallardo equal Gallardo SE,F40 fast than F50 etc...

0-60 4.2 0-100 9.7 1/4 mile 12.6@113 tested by R&T