Bugatti EB 16.4 Veyron specs

Bugatti Veyron 100-200 km-h dragy run

AMS 15/2005:
Weight: 1950 kg
100-0 kph: 31.4 m
Fuel: 24.0 - 100.1 l/100 km
Price: 1160000 €

AMS 23/2006:
0-250 kph: 11.4 s

Imagine putting this car's engine into the EB110. That'd be fast.

Personally I always liked the base car's looks compared to the SS. Besides, I don't need 15 mph more speed for a million more dollars. Supposedly, this car can go 260 but the ECU limits it to 253. Still, the car's 0-100 and 200 is better than the Koenigsegg Agera today. I would still take this over a Koenigsegg because it's more comfortable and has awd, which is faster and has a lot more traction. What I'm wondering about is the Nurburgring laptime. Supposedly some Aussie magazine got 7:40. Sure the car isn't designed for handling, but I'd think that 1000 hp would help on the Nurburgring's many straights.

the kph claims are for Euro spec Veyrons. the mph claims are for US spec Veyrons. ;-)

To think the fastest car in the world in 1927 had this amount of power but displaced 44 litres and weighed 3300 kg! No wonder it could only do 340 lol. Imagine 340 km/hr on 1927 tires on a Welsh beach! The Sunbeams streamlined shape was not entirely different. March of technology is amazing.

0-250: 11.4 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/22361080016/

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/motor-shows-geneva-motor-show/2016-bugatti-chiron-revealed-veyrons-260mph-successor-here

Bugatti Chiron:

1479 bhp
2.5 sec 0-62mph time
6.5 sec 0-124mph time
13.6 sec 0-186mph time
261mph top speed

Bugatti Veyron vs Nissan GTR Nismo 0-300 km/h

Why do .3's or .4's sometimes round up? This literally did the standing mile in 25.9 @ 204.4, but for some reason it got rounded up to 205. Like the Dodge Viper GTS, which actually did 30.1 @ 173.3, but for some strange reason it shows as 30.1 @ 174.

http://uselessresearch.blogspot.com/2007/08/group-test-road-track-0-200-mph-test.html
Sunday, August 26, 2007
GROUP TEST: Road & Track 0-200 mph test

It actually doesnt tell anything...Maybe if you actually looked more into that You would see WHY its not on here, This is a LAPTIME database, Do you think a laptime from a Veyron would not be noticed?......

@BR2+
there is a car magazine site which tells the 7:40 laptime
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1076965_bugatti-veyron-supersport-attempts-record-nrburgring-lap-time-video

Supercar world is NOT a source.

And don't you think, If that time were legitimate we would already have it after all these years?...I mean do we really have to hold your hand on EVERYTHING you add?..

Why was the 7:40 Nürburgring Nordschleife time deleted? (There are at least five sources for the laptime.)

https://www.google.com/search?q=7%3A40+veyron+ring&oq=7%3A40+veyron+ring&aqs=chrome..69i57.3957j0j4&client=ms-android-metropcs-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&espvd=1&ie=UTF-8

Also....
http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?180

It was not even an estimate.

Yes and no. It will go both ways, But you NEED a hell of a driver in the CCX if your gonna beat it. SO yes and no is the correct answer.

Can this beat a Koenigsegg CCX in a mile?

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

While it may do 253 mph, its gear ratios limit the car to 190.

Mayby Ferrari F12 GTO will be a fast enough. We will see. I hope so.

well that's mainly only because most of the really powerful cars are RWD.

I just wonder...Veyron is 2005 car.

Now we have late 2013 and we still dont have a supercar (supercar, not hypercar like Veyrons, Koenigseggs etc) that can be match for a Veyron in terms of pure straight line acceleration.

Hypercars gone crazy.

The performance's improvement in supercars segment is not spectacular.

This Car is Faster Than Koenigsegg CCX on Straight Line,But Slower on Track.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

it takes 1 week to assemble the engine, up to 15 hours to make 1 radiator, it takes 4-5 weeks to make the car from start to finish

source: megafactories

after watching the megafactories vid i find one thing dissapointining, the fact that it uses fighter jet stainless steel for the sub-frames, doesn't sound dissapointing but you should know that stainless steel is heavier than normal steel

@ Fangio Man: The Veyron's weight gives it great straight line stability at the insane speeds this car is capable of, but compromise handling and acceleration, but still, 2.5 seconds 0-60 MPH is pretty darn quick.

@Shaggy
I know it is very heavy.
But for the new Veyron they will use more carbon to make it over 200 kg lighter.

But you are right, track performance will not be much better than in the old.

@ Fangio Man: I think the Veyron's weight hinders its track performance, this thing weighs more than my truck.

I think it would be very cool if the "Super Veyron" would be a really performance car.
Good straight line speed and very good track performance!
I know that is too much to expect from the Veyron but it would be AWESOME! D8

They will produce that Super Veryon coze they want to make the newest hypercars look like peaky hatchbacks.

I have admit that first Veryon was insane impressive...OMG unimaginible power and that staggering acceleration 0-100 , 100-200, 200-300 and 300 ++...

That Super Veyron is going to do that again...it is going to appoint the new standards on truly psychotic levels...

That is why i think Laferrari and 918 Spyder are puny - im trying to change that point of view but whenever i think that my favorite hypercars are so puny in comparison to a even a "normal" Veyron...it is a realy bad feeling :(...