Image of Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport

Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport specs

Price in Europe €1,160,000 - €1,963,500
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1888-2056 kg (4162-4533 lbs)
Introduced 2010
Origin country France
Views 360.7k


0 - 80 kph2.2 s
0 - 100 kph2.5 s
0 - 130 kph3.7 s
0 - 180 kph5.9 s
0 - 200 kph6.7 s
0 - 300 kph14.6 s
1000 m18.0 s @ 295.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph4.7 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph10.2 s
0 - 60 mph2.4 s
0 - 100 mph4.9 s
0 - 150 mph10.2 s
0 - 200 mph22.2 s
Est. 1/8 mile6.8 s @ 117.4 mph
1/4 mile9.9 s @ 146.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile16.0 s @ 180.2 mph
Top speed434 kph (270 mph)
Est. max acceleration1.09 g (11 m/s²)
300 kph - 0310 m (1015 ft)
Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type W16 quad turbo
Displacement 8.0 l (488 ci)
Power 1199 ps (1183 bhp / 882 kw) @ 6400 rpm
Torque 1500 Nm (1106 lb-ft) @ 3000 rpm
Power / liter 150 ps (148 hp)
Power / weight 602 ps (594 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 753 Nm (555 lb-ft) / t
Power / €5000 4 ps
Transmission 7
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

ChironSS  1m ago

These are Autocar test figures for the Bugatti Veyron Supersport. I pulled these from deep in another comments stream quote>

"The SS tested by Autocar was tested in a heavy cross wind which may account for the slower top end times. The Bugatti Quarter mile time of 9.7 secs is probably an optimum time on a sticky circuit!

You can buy Autocar for £5.99, but to save you the bother, here are the main figures.

0-60: 2.6
0-70: 3.1
0-100: 5.0
0-130: 7.6
0-150: 10.2
0-170: 13.7
0-180: 16.2
0-190: 19.4
0-200: 22.2
0-220: 31.1

Track temp was just 6 degrees celsius, which perhaps explains the slightly slow standing quarter time."

The very interesting thing is we can calculate>

0-300km/h= Average 180MPH and 190MPH= 16.2 and 19.4 seconds= 17.8 seconds 0-185MPH~ close enough.


Edit: Bugatti Chiron 0-200MPH= 15.7 seconds. That's 6.5 seconds quicker!

User avatar

ChironSS  4m ago

18 seconds at 295km/h? Ooofff. The Mclaren 720S is relatively equal. And even if it isn't the Mclaren 765LT would SPANK it. But obviously not the Bugatti Chiron. All incredibly impressive machines with stupifying engineering.

But at 150K for a 720S I'd say that was too much (perhaps) for daily driving.

And then Ferrari took it another level up with the SF90.

We truly are in the Golden Age for production and therefore street performance. Hypercars of just a few years ago getting spanked by supercars.

Bugatti for their next hypercar NEED to drop weight not just add power.

User avatar

ChironSS  6m ago

The Bugatti Veyron Supersport NEVER LOST it's Guiness World Record! Everything that came afterwards partakes in the VBox "championship". A DECADE later and she's still doing the BUSINESS.

Yes the Bugatti Chiron Supersport 300+ is the ONE. But awhile back I watched some of irritating "Hi Guys" videos about the World Record Edition and she's a beauty.

I wonder if Molshiem willslip the standard production Chiron W16 in it? The CONVERTIBLE! Now that's a combination! Oo

User avatar

CarCritic  1y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

User avatar

ChironSS  1y ago

Still a KILLER after all these years!

User avatar

dante  2y ago

the pandemic has taken control of power


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2y ago

AutoMotorSport (9/2011):
0-50 kph: 1.5 s
0-60 kph: 1.7 s
0-120 kph: 3.3 s
0-140 kph: 4.0 s
0-160 kph: 4.9 s
80-120 kph: 1.1 s
100-0 kph: 36.7 m
190-0 kph: 131.0 m
Slalom 18m: 66.0 kph

User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2y ago


User avatar

benedekpuskas  3y ago

W16? 16 is not divisible with 3, so how it can be a W engine?

User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

The emotionless, faceless (and often very stupid) FL AI says 6:58 at Nurburgring.... interesting. That would require some serious risk taking, both financially and health-wise :D

User avatar

Thiago_Lins  4y ago

Autocar test?

User avatar

wazz upppppppppppppppppppppp  4y ago

train are faster

User avatar

Jeffyjeffy  4y ago

Ferrari does 0-200 mph im 19.7 seconds and super sport does 0-200 mph in 22.2 seconds thats suprising i guess ferrari is faster in long distance bugatti is faster at short distance it over bugatti has slow accleration

User avatar

cosimo  5y ago

two tone na*i shepherd color ?


vw doh! lol

User avatar

Fastedee  5y ago

I used to think you had diminished gains with every extra 100bhp not that it worked against ya...Cripes...Bwa Ha Ha Ha Haaaa#!!!. Did the hot Rod boys ever do a 1/4 in a Veyron,918 or even a 488. Fastest accelerator in the US..suure and their butts a windmill.

User avatar

saxy  5y ago

The king of bullshit

User avatar

Dodge Bro  5y ago

Challenger Demon is King now!

User avatar

TaZeMeRkzZ  5y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

User avatar

BR2+  5y ago

...the king of what?

User avatar

Hawkeye  5y ago

The King

User avatar

jb25600  6y ago

sophie ne répond plus ,quelqu'un peut m'aider?

User avatar

Pedro Teixeira  7y ago

Pode ser muito potente e rápido, mas para mim é um pouco feio. Qualquer Ferrari é mais bonito que este minha opinião...........claro ;)

User avatar

Thiago_Lins  7y ago

100-120 mph in 6ª Autocar test?

User avatar

BR2+  9y ago

...The Aventador aint being ahead of this in any form of acceleration, And I doubt the LaFerrari either, But I am curious about that. The LaFerrari has weight and tech, But theres no getting away from that monstrous torque and 250Bhp extra, But maybe im wrong.

User avatar

Naz  9y ago

The Veyron Super sport has mental acceleration, off the lines it awesome. But the Aventador has thrust control and better overall grip off the line meaning if the had a race, the Aventador would be ahead for the first 40meters and then the SS will catch up and rip it. Although the laferrari has better acceleration, dispite the SS having a higher top speed.

User avatar

Sal30  9y ago

4,150 lbs = FAIL

User avatar

Georg  9y ago

0 - 200 MPH = 322km/h in 22.2s
0 - 183 MPH = 295km/h in 18.0s

just read more carefully...

0 - 125 MPH = 200km/h in 6.7s

User avatar

saxy  9y ago

God, if you talking about track performance, why would you count from standing start acceleration times. Majority of the acceleration factors is in the 100-200kph range and how nimble a car is in slow corners. The 991 gt3 is faster than the 12C around a couple Tracks despite being sloop much slower to 200, 300 kph

User avatar

js  9y ago

0-160 is useless, for on a track, you will be going much faster than that on almost all tracks. The times that matter are later acceleration, like 0-200, or 0-300. Ferrari has a history of understating statistics. For whatever reason they do so, I don't know, but they do. Ferrari claims a time of 15 seconds to 300, and less than 7 seconds to 200. So you can count on LaFerrari putting down times a bit faster than those numbers. The SS puts a time of 14.6 seconds to 300, and 6.7 to 200. My guess is it will be close. And around a track, LaFerrari and P1 will smoke the SuperSport. That 4500 pound tank won't turn like nimble 2700 pound cars derived from F1 technology. But it all comes down to function. The Veyron wants to be the fastest car in a line, and still comfortable and refined. In this, it succeeds. LaFerrari and P1 intend to be specifically the fastest cars around tracks, and in this they succeed.

User avatar

5ko  9y ago

how come 0-200 kp/h is 22,2 sec and 1000m is covered in 18 sec @ 295 kp/h exit speed ? Something is wrong with this article