Cadillac ATS-V Coupe specs

V6 Turbo is certainly an interesting concept for an American car of that time. I'm not sure if I'd take this over a Mk2 CTS-V but I'm weighing my options

@FastestLaps please delete the 0-100mph in 8.4 and the 0-150mph in 19.8. They were not in the issue 6/2015

SportAuto (8/2017):
0-60 kph: 2.3 s
0-80 kph: 3.3 s
0-120 kph: 5.8 s
0-140 kph: 7.5 s
0-180 kph: 12.1 s

Please delete the 0-100 mph and 0-150 mph datas, they are done by the sedan version!

The sedan version has 464 HP and I don't think GM would make the coupé and the sedan version have different power figures.

Wikipedia authors sometimes don't know the difference between metric horsepower and imperial. That 464 could be PS, not HP.

But I will applaud the fact that use of "PS" and metric horsepower has become mainstream across all types of media (online and offline). This wasn't the case 5-7 years ago. FL was one of the pioneers of using the PS and metric as primary acronym and unit for horsepower.

Power is 464 HP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadillac_ATS-V

I think the 1/8-mile est. came from the original (coupe) results "fakefillerfour" spreaded 4 months ago; but I did notice the estimates for the Ferrari Enzo was slightly changed a month ago, and the 599 GTB had its 1/8 est. trap down from 105 to 103, while retaining the 7.7s number.

Nvm, the 12.1@122 # is for the Sedan model. :(

If this was doing 0-60 in 3.9 and 0-100 in 8.4 (C&D #'s), it would have to do the 1/8-mile in 7.9-8.5 seconds at 96-101 mph, especially with the 1/4 being 12.1@122.

Because estimates are not often re-calculated (hardly ever are).

Why does the 1/8-mile estimate still show 8.2@90 if this one did 8.4 to 100? lol

Everyone knows it's not possible to go from 90-100 in 0.2 seconds unless you had a funnycar or top fuel dragster.

Some pretty amazing results.

3800lbs, Single clutch and rwd and for 61k Usd, A trap speed the same as an M5?...That is impressive.

Saloon version

https://fastestlaps.com/models/cadillac-ats-v-coupe

New C&D instrumented test:
(http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2016-cadillac-ats-v-coupe-test-review)

Zero to 60 mph: 4.2 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.9 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 13.7 sec
Standing 1/4-mile: 12.6 sec @ 115 mph

ATS-v This time with the 8-speed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9j_AlzZAWg&index=1&list=FLMX0InKsiuh5WnQ-tKmSCCg

ATS-V on the track! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEd56ToLoNI

I expected this to be lighter.

Haha BR2+, I forgot you hate the look of the CTS coupe.
I agree that the M4 would probably we quicker in shear acceleration, but Cadillac has been good on delivering recently. Track performance is going to be VERY interesting...

Yeah looks great, 4 door looks good to, Atleast they didnt fk the coupe up like they did with the CTS, I still think this car is about 12 inches too long, But looks great, But it wont out accelerate the M4, Im almost 100% certain, On track however it just might, Dunno though, Very good chance of it though.

Yeah it's a good looking coupe, the sedan looks great as well... I'm dying to see if it can out-perform the new M3/M4. See if it can take after it's older brother CTS-V :)

I "Think" i might rather have a V8, But that is what the CTS is for, For this car im not too picky about it, Its nice to see a high powered 6 cylinder car. Although i would have gave it round 500Bhp or so, To match the 'True" Bhp number of its main rival the M4. But nontheless it looks fantastic inside and out, Cant wait for tests.

I think the car would be quicker with a normally aspirated V8 with the same horsepower.

Put Coupe after the name-_-