Saw this last night, nothing special, it looks like a modified base model.
Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE Package (Mk VI) specs
| Price in Europe | €89,900 - €107,900 |
| Price in US | $72,195 - $75,985 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1733-1763 kg (3821-3887 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2018 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Gas mileage | 24.3-12.3 l/100 km (10-19 mpg US / 12-23 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 322 g/km |
| Tyres | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperCar 3 |
| Views | 62.5k |
| Submitted by | BR2+ |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 4.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 5.3 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 6.6 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 18.7 s |
| 0 - 160 mph | 23.6 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 100.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.5 s @ 124.0 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.6 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 5.3 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 7.7 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 9.1 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 11.0 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 13.9 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 20.7 s |
| 1000 m | 20.2 s @ 246.1 kph |
General performance
| Top speed | 310 kph (193 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.6 s @ 804 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.73 g (7 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 70.4 kph (43.7 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.18 g (12 m/s²) |
| Noise @ idle | 46 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 70 dB |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Supercharged LT4 V8 |
| Displacement | 6.2 l (378 ci) |
| Power | 659 ps (650 bhp / 485 kw) |
| Torque | 881 Nm (650 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 106 ps (105 hp) |
| Power / weight | 377 ps (372 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 504 Nm (372 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 36 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 34 ps |
| Transmission | 6 speed manual or 10 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 100 kph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 117 m (385 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 28 m (91 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 42 m (137 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 82 m (268 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 2.9 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 3.1 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 5.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 7.0 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 9.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 12.5 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 9.0 s |
Camaro ZL1 1LE Package competition
Corvolet3 1w ago
Budget C7 Z06
humana 1w ago
The base model of this car is a good 5 grand cheaper than even this, and has the same engine https://fastestlaps.com/models/chevrolet-camaro-zl1-mk-vi
jeremyclarkson1 1w ago
@FastestLaps it was also available with a 10 Speed Automatic after 2019 I believe
humana 1w ago
Terrible option but it was: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a26075915/chevrolet-camaro-zl1-1le-automatic-transmission/
FastestLaps 1w ago @humana
You get 4 extra ratios which is not insignificant. I bet it was at least as fast as manual, if not faster.
Cocobe 1w ago
agree, for lots of people that are just trying to have a good time on track, the automatic is probably better. You not only have to drive your own best, you have to watch out for traffic too. A manual is more fun, but that's also another thing to worry, in an already quite hectic car to drive with 650hp.
jeremyclarkson1 1w ago @FastestLaps
It was actually 7 tenths quicker on VIR Grand West according to car and driver
humana 1y ago
Lol the camaro is done for
https://www.carscoops.com/2025/02/gm-execs-shut-down-plans-to-revive-chevy-camaro/
wallenieswiftie 2y ago
Insane improvements with the ZLE Camaro! MUCH faster than I have ever expected/felt!
Most particularly the 2019 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE manual and automatic cars (the manual gets tested first but I have built this mod with the automatic in mind)
0:00 prototype testing
12:23 ZLE manual (driver mod)
21:04 ZLE automatic (driver mod)
30:24 ZLE manual (driver mod radical)
40:55 ZLE automatic (driver mod radical)
50:32 the end
First run: 7'19"71 full layout, 7'15"47 semi-full layout, 7'00"53 BTG layout
Second run: 7'19"18 full layout, 7'14"44 semi-full layout, 6'59"63 BTG layout
Third run: 7'03"90 full layout, 6'59"34 semi-full layout, 6'44"72 BTG layout
Fourth run: 7'01"49 full layout, 6'57"34 semi-full layout, 6'43"88 BTG layout
wallenieswiftie 2y ago
Honestly, it's close to impossible to achieve anywhere near factory lap times with the ZLE Camaro. However, an automatic ZLE would shave off about 10 seconds from the manual ZLE's lap time. I'd put it somewhere around the 7:06 ballpark (or 7:12 with the politically correct +232m turn in mind), considering the manual one did it in 7:16 (7:22).
When this car came out, the ultimate Mustang was the Shelby GT350R, just 1-2 years (depending on the ZL1's transmission choice) before the then-new GT500 came out. Even with the carbon fiber track package intsalled, the GT500 was no match for the ZLE in handling, and it really achieves its peak downforce at 180 mph (versus 150 in the ZLE model).
By the way, I agree with AaronVector (scroll down until you see his name for more information). The ultimate Camaro should have stayed the Z/28, perhaps with an LT3 engine (basically a flat-plane-crank LT1 with the bore and stroke figures of an LS7). THAT ONE would have slotted between the 2015 GT350R and the 2025 GTD in both age and performance!
None of this is meant to dismiss the ZLE as a true track car. However, it takes a whole lot of skill to drive one on a track as long as Germany's Green Hell.
Theoretically, the ZLE can do just under 7:10 with the 6-speed and just over 7:00 with the 10-speed. If I have any newer videos with the improved lap times, they will be uploaded to YouTube as usual.
Bugatti4Life the real one 3y ago
AaronVector 4y ago
I cannot believe it took me 5 years to realise this but Chevy made a huge mistake with the model range of the 6th gen Camaro! The Z28 was supposed to have a detuned version of the supercharged LT4 motor making about 605hp and the ZL1 was supposed to have a detuned version of the supercharged LT5 motor making about 710hp, however Chevy just let the Camaro Z28 have the exact same LT4 motor as the C7 Z06 making 650hp, then decided to call it ZL1 instead of Z28, then Chevy just canceled the entire (true) ZL1 program! They introduced the SS 1LE package a year before and made sure it was really good in order to substitute for a lack of a Z28. I have no idea how I missed this.
Remember how the 5th gen camaro Z28 had the LS7 motor from the C6 Z06, and the ZL1 had a detuned version of the supercharged LS9 motor? That's almost exactly how it was supposed to be with the C7 and 6th gen camaro
hostboy 4y ago
((20600m/(250km/h/(182m*0.3048m))x(1829kg/638hp)/1.27g)x0.0095x0.95 = 7:29 for regular ZL1 models
((20600m/(250km/h/(182m*0.3048m))x(1829kg/638hp)/1.27g)x0.0095x0.925 = 7:17 for the 1LE version, which is very close to GM's verified 7:16 laptime record.
The ZL1 models match their claims in terms of estimations!
hostboy 4y ago
@FastestLaps please transfer all ZL1 1LE data to the original ZL1 page and delete this page, it's cluttering and pointless... seriously, it's like adding a Weissach Pack version as a separate from the regular RS versions of Porsche models, it's too much clutter... plus the 1LE is not any faster in a straight line
Only real differences are the wing, splitter and tires... not enough to separate and also not much lighter, only by around 50-60 lbs
https://fastestlaps.com/models/chevrolet-camaro-zl1-mk-vi
This and the GT500 CFTP page both should be deleted or transferred. Thanks
hostboy 4y ago
I won't be doing a future straight-line performance simulation on the ZL1 1LE model since it's actually not any faster than the regular model in that department. I have yet to develop professional estimations for road course laptimes. This way we can compare ZLE vs ZL1, Z51 vs Stingray, etc etc.
For future performance simulations, please refer to the regular ZL1 page.
hostboy 4y ago
Estimated Acceleration Stats: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE (Manual/Automatic)
0-30 MPH: 1.7 sec/1.5 sec
0-40 MPH: 2.2 sec/2.1 sec
0-50 MPH: 2.8 sec/2.6 sec
0-60 MPH: 3.4 sec/3.1 sec (100 km/h: 3,5/3,2)
0-70 MPH: 4.2 sec/3.8 sec
0-80 MPH: 5.1 sec/4.5 sec
0-90 MPH: 6.1 sec/5.3 sec
0-100 MPH: 7.4 sec/6.3 sec
0-120 MPH: 10.5 sec/8.9 sec (200 km/h: 11,4/9,7)
0-150 MPH: 18.6 sec/16.7 sec (250 km/h: 21,0/19,7)
0-180 MPH: 39.0 sec (300 km/h: 46,2) (manual)
Top Speed: 193.3231/174.5457 mph (311.1234/280.9040 km/h)
Manual standing quartermile time (no rollout): 3.4+7.4/(3.4+7.4)x12.5 = 11.95sec@127mph
Acceleration off the line (manual): 7.854103 m/s2 = 0.80 G = 0.3s rollout (11.65 dragstrip time)
Automatic standing quartermile time (no rollout): 3.1+6.3/(3.1+6.3)x12.5 = 11.45sec@133mph
Acceleration off the line (automatic): 8.62299 m/s2 = 0.88 G = 0.25s rollout (11.20 dragstrip time; 10.95 with VHT prep and Track Mode enabled)
Disclaimer: DON'T take the automatic results above seriously. I have configured some corrected estimates, including a 4.0s 0-100 sprint along with an 11.9 0-200 time without a rollout in this comparison:
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/vrhdkf3ji28k
That said, the automatic ZLE should be quicker in one whole kilometer than its manual counterpart on average, while retaining an identical quartermile time. This is because shifting times on the auto are lightning quick compared to the auto. With rollout, one should expect 3.7 to 100 and 11.6 to 200. It could still do 11.5 on a quartermile dragstrip, but I doubt that it's aero would push it towards 11.1. A regular automatic ZL1 should be quicker by one-tenth than a ZLE, but it's even better-built for the strip anyway with a theoretical 11.4 quartermile time.
Engine speed @ maximum torque [rpm]
3600
Engine speed @ maximum power [rpm]
6600
Gear ratios [-] Gearbox (mt on top, at on bottom)
2.289,1.611,1.208,1,0.818,0.675
4.70,2.99,2.15,1.80,1.52,1.28,1.00,0.85,0.69,0.64
Differential (manual/automatic)
3.73/2.85
Wheel static radius [m]
0.339
Driveline efficiency [-]
0.686 (manual, gears I-V); 0.85 (manual, gear VI); 1 (automatic)
Wheel (tire) friction coefficient [-]
1
Rear axle load coefficient [-]
1
Vehicle mass (curb) [kg]
1732 (pre-240km/h); 1868 (post-240km/h)
Driver mass [kg]
75
Aerodynamic drag coefficient [-]
0.509
Ambient air density [kg/m3]
1.202
Vehicle frontal area [m2]
2.07
Road slope [%]
0.00
Road load coefficient [-]
-.002 (manual); 0.121 (automatic)
Engine speed points (full load) [rpm]
2500,3600,4400,5400,6000,6400
Engine static torque points (full load) [Nm]
803,881,881,803,771,723
Simulation time [s]
60
Rounded corners II
High, rounded, flat bonnet
High scuttle, rounded top wings
Bowed
Rounded
Constant width
Semi-fastback
Outward taper
Monocoque (RWD, front engine)
Perfectly smooth body, with mirrors
Best design
Closed cockpit
305-30-19 front and 325-30-19 rear tires
Race car (speedway) configuration
1897mm(x)1330mm
http://hpwizard.com/aerodynamics.html
= 0.509 Cd, 2.07m2 frontal area, 1.05m2 drag area, -3.93m2 lift area
Hoppelmoppel123 5y ago
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevrolet/camaro/2018/2018-chevrolet-camaro-zl1-1le-first-test-review/
price: 71295 usd
track: https://fastestlaps.com/tracks/area-27#147963
time: 2:11.88
driver: Randy Pobst
track: https://fastestlaps.com/tracks/area-27#147963
time: 2:11.98
driver: Bill Wise
Kramar 6y ago
Here's my lap @ VIR full. 1:58.7 w/ a completely stock car https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSoW1ucU5hk&t=240s
aaayy 7y ago
Now that they updated this car with the 10-speed gearbox, do ya think it'll be faster 'round the 'ring?
Also, this car with the 1LE package versus the Ford Mustang GT500 with the Track Pack? Which will be faster?




















