Estimated Acceleration Stats: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 (Sixth Generation; Manual/Automatic):
0-30 MPH: 1.8 sec/1.8 sec
0-40 MPH: 2.3 sec/2.5 sec
0-50 MPH: 2.9 sec/3.1 sec
0-60 MPH: 3.5 sec/3.7 sec (100 km/h: 3,7/3,9)
0-70 MPH: 4.4 sec/4.6 sec
0-80 MPH: 5.3 sec/5.5 sec
0-90 MPH: 6.3 sec/6.5 sec
0-100 MPH: 7.6 sec/7.8 sec
0-120 MPH: 10.7 sec/10.8 sec (200 km/h: 11,5/11,6)
0-150 MPH: 17.7 sec/18.1 sec (250 km/h: 19,5/20,0)
0-180 MPH: 31.3 sec/33.1 sec (300 km/h: 36,1/40,2)
0-200 MPH: 54.2 sec (manual)
Top Speed: 203.9734/194.2338 mph (328.2633/312.5891 km/h)
Engine speed @ maximum torque [rpm]
3600
Engine speed @ maximum power [rpm]
6600
Gear ratios [-] (m on top, a on bottom) Gearbox
2.289,1.611,1.208,1,0.818,0.536
4.70,2.99,2.15,1.80,1.52,1.28,1.00,0.85,0.69,0.64
Differential (manual/automatic)
3.73/2.85
Wheel static radius [m]
0.345
Driveline efficiency [-]
0.686; changed to 0.850 for manual only in gear VI
Wheel (tire) friction coefficient [-]
1
Rear axle load coefficient [-]
1 (manual); 0.75 (automatic)
Vehicle mass (curb) [kg]
1763 (manual); 1789 (automatic)
Driver mass [kg]
75
Aerodynamic drag coefficient [-]
0.364
Ambient air density [kg/m3]
1.202
Vehicle frontal area [m2]
2.07
Road slope [%]
0.00
Road load coefficient [-]
0.011
Engine speed points (full load) [rpm]
2500,3600,4400,5400,6000,6400
Engine static torque points (full load) [Nm]
803,881,881,803,771,723
Simulation time [s]
60
Manual standing quartermile time (no rollout): 3.5+7.6/(3.5+7.6)x12.5 = 12.05sec@127mph
Acceleration off the line (manual): 7.460482 m/s2 = 0.76 G = 0.3s rollout (11.75 dragstrip time)
Automatic standing quartermile time (no rollout): 3.7+7.8/(3.7+7.8)x12 = 11.85sec@125mph
Acceleration off the line (automatic): 7.24959 m/s2 = 0.74 G = 0.3s rollout (11.55 dragstrip time)
I will do ZL1 1LE next.
https://x-engineer.org/projects/vehicle-acceleration-performance-online-calculator/
I'll be honest, Camaros are pretty hard to work on for a simulator. Especially the modern ones (gens V and VI). For the initial run on a manual car, it showed a 3-flat 0-100km/h time and a virtually impossible 9.05s 0-200km/h time, even with the 0.85 driveline efficiency.
Having temporarily set the curb weight from 1763 to 2186kg, I see the 0-100 time increased to 3.65s and the 0-200 vastly increased to 11.2s; these results right here are accurate for a 6-speeder.
This ratio (650/2186) is roughly equal to 525/1763. So, by reverting the curb weight to 1763kg and reducing the driveline efficiency to 0.686 (which seems awfully low, but I'll explain more to this in a sec), I saw 0-100 in 3.7 and 0-200 in 11.5; X-Engineer seems to only care about dual-clutch turbocharged cars. But that top speed ended up being a little less than 300km/h.
376.0509 ci and "luxury car" (even though a ZL1 isn't actually one) = 2186kg
http://hpwizard.com/car-weight.html
Rounded corners I
High, rounded, flat bonnet
High scuttle, low wings
Bowed
Rounded
Constant width
Semi-fastback
Outward taper
Monocoque (RWD, front engine)
Perfectly smooth body, with mirrors
Best design
Closed cockpit
285-30-20 front and 305-30-20 rear tires
Production model (sport) with production lift
1897mm(x)1330mm
http://hpwizard.com/aerodynamics.html
= 0.364 Cd, 2.07m2 frontal area, 0.75m2 drag area, 0.41m2 lift area
Technically, the Camaro ZL1 has an even lower frontal area than the McLaren 720S.