Image of Dodge Charger R/T 1969

Dodge Charger R/T 1969 (Mk II) specs

Price in US $4,819
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1542-1633 kg (3400-3600 lbs)
Dimensions 5.18 m (204 in) long, 1.91 m (75 in) wide, 1.37 m (54 in) high
Wheelbase 2.97 m (117 in)
Introduced 1969
Origin country United States
Gas mileage 22.6-19.9 l/100 km (10-12 mpg US / 12-14 mpg UK)
Views 30.5k
Submitted by Davy13682

Performance

0 - 30 mph2.6 s
0 - 60 mph6.1 s
1/4 mile13.9 s @ 101.4 mph
30 mph - 09 m (31 ft)
60 mph - 044 m (143 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 7.2 l (440 ci / 7210 cc)
Power 380 ps (375 bhp / 280 kw) @ 4600 rpm
Torque 651 Nm (480 lb-ft) @ 3200 rpm
Power / liter 53 ps (52 hp)
Power / weight 239 ps (236 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 410 Nm (302 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 18 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 4 speed manual
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More Dodge cars 129

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

anonymoused  1y ago

The 440 is an underrated engine in the R/T models. Just as much force as a 426 with the durability of a 383. The only thing is I don’t like that Forza offers only the 440 in the Charger without even offering to swap it out for the 426.

Reply +1
479  

User avatar

anonymoused  1y ago

Mopar was the king of big blocks. Most US manufacturers sticked with one halo engine offering for their muscle car, but not MoPar. They had TWO at the same time… the 440 six bubble and the 426 Hemi. a sibling rivalry between the two in a good way.

Take for example Ford : they produced mostly 428s, replacing the 427s but with even worse performance, and the 429 was rather rare and only in a few cars.


User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2y ago

@fastestlaps 1/4 mile and top speed are estimates from automobile-catalog.com

Reply +2
889 1 reply

User avatar

Bill Hage  2y ago

I/4 mile I did 13.92 with M/T wider tires. This website like all the others copy from each other to get their specs, that's why they are never right. I had a 60 Pontiac Bonneville 389 2bbl and that would go over 127

Reply
1.4k 1 reply

User avatar

Mel C.  3y ago

My speedometer must have been incredibly inaccurate then, because back in 1972 I commuted 50 miles (each way) with the needled pegged at 150 mph.


User avatar

Shaggy  14y ago

Actually, the top speed is 142 MPH.


User avatar

bruno  14y ago

eu sou um fanatico por charger rt69 porque nos jogos de carros ele é o melhor para que gosta destes carro clasicos

Reply
4.8k 1 reply

User avatar

driver  15y ago

Can you post the Hemi version?

Reply
4.2k  

User avatar

Davy13682  15y ago

And by the way your 'link' brings me to a 1991 BMW...

Reply +1
3.8k  

User avatar

Davy13682  15y ago

Why do you add cars before collecting the datas?
BTW I found this:
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
It writes:
375hp at 4600, 654 Nm at 3200, 7.2 liters, V8, n/a, carburator, 16 valves, 10.1 compression ratio, 4 speed manual gearbox. Also shows different mass and dimension datas.
(All the power datas are SAE gross, so in the reality they are lower.)

Sorry sir, but I have a life and I have other things to do besides this website, since this is my favourite I just wanted it to be added, the data I entered for mass and size are directly from wikipedia.

Reply +1
3.4k 4 replies

User avatar

Inline 6 rules  15y ago

Why do you add cars before collecting the datas?
BTW I found this:
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
It writes:
375hp at 4600, 654 Nm at 3200, 7.2 liters, V8, n/a, carburator, 16 valves, 10.1 compression ratio, 4 speed manual gearbox. Also shows different mass and dimension datas.
(All the power datas are SAE gross, so in the reality they are lower.)


User avatar

Davy13682  15y ago

There is still alot of data that I dont know and my internet is so slow that I can't upload a picture at the moment!

Reply
1.6k  

Timeline