| Price in Europe | €85,900 |
| Price in US | $73,240 - $83,405 |
| Car type | 4-door saloon |
| Curb weight | 1991-2103 kg (4389-4636 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2019 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Gas mileage | 15.7-15.3 l/100 km (15-15 mpg US / 18-18 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 367 g/km |
| Views | 2.6k |
| Submitted by | fakekillerfour |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.1 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.1 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 10.3 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 12.8 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 15.7 s |
| 0 - 240 kph | 19.5 s |
| 0 - 260 kph | 25.2 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.6 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.8 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 13.1 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 18.0 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 100.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.9 s @ 124.0 mph |
| Top speed | 322 kph (200 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.73 g (7 m/s²) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.94 g (9 m/s²) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 36 m (117 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 58 m (190 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 49 m (162 ft) |
| Engine type | V8 supercharged 16 valve |
| Displacement | 6.2 l (378 ci) |
| Power | 717 ps (707 bhp / 527 kw) |
| Torque | 881 Nm (650 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 116 ps (114 hp) |
| Power / weight | 347 ps (343 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 427 Nm (315 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 46 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 42 ps |
| Transmission | 8 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
wallenieswiftie 4y ago
These simulation results come surprisingly close to real-life results from Car & Driver.
0-60: 4.29 sec (C&D: 4.1 with added rollout)
0-100: 8.14 (C&D: 8.2)
60-100: 3.85 (C&D: 4.1)
Even its simulated 0-150 time of 18.2 is barely quicker than C&D's recorded 18.3. Chrysler claims 196 mph for top speed, but its range is 194-204.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EGSLVU3YQNbYkc6kJ4uKGmi0ulsAT_nDnAEBa72b7kw/edit?usp=sharing
wallenieswiftie 4y ago
Looking back to my estimates, the posted Hellcat numbers (especially 0-60) do look quite unfortunate. But if you think about it, it's more than an accurate representation of what the Hellcat and Redeye will be getting, combined with the 60-100. The problem is that they'll only be getting rollout-included sub-4 times one every like two blue moons on a street surface.
If these actually did crack into the 3's (not counting grifter press/ringer magazine tests), their 60-100 times would be even worse by 0.1-0.2s, which means their trap speeds will fare even worse as a result of overgrip.
An AWD version of a Redeye Charger (+200-300 lbs from RWD, but I'll use 250 as an average) would do 3.07-3.09 0-60, but acceleration is worse shortly after that.
Let's assume a RWD Redeye got the best 0-60 time recorded on the street (will almost always require PJ1 TrackBite glue and great use of launch control). Mostly 10mph increments before 100mph.
HOLY GUACAMOLE! Its weight distribution would be an even worse 60.5% to the front wheels with a sole 150# driver (59.3% without).
0-30: 1.46 - 1.70
0-60: 3.60 - 3.38
0-100: 7.22 - 7.00
0-130: 11.51 - 11.55
0-160: 18.71 - 19.22
Subtracted .55 from the simulated 0-130 and 0-160 to better analog with the optimal 0-100 time since apparently they were being trailed by an imaginary AWD version (I've never done that before actually)
I've had a milder issue with the Maserati Ghibli Trofeo, but on that car, for testing purposes it was mostly a bug and not a feature. The Ghibli Trofeo was supposed to do 0-60 in 4.71 according to the simulator; later corrected to 3.94, but 0-100 remained the same at 9.04.
Havokkers 4y ago @wallenieswiftie
Fake Numbers don't add up.
Have you ever thought of returning to school and get proper education ?
I can help you with that if you promise not to flirt with my granny.
hostboy 4y ago
@FastestLaps, please either redirect this to the original Hellcat page or change the power number to 727 PS and 889 N.m
FastestLaps 4y ago
Why 727? Does the widebody come with power increase or is it mid-cycle refresh / facelift power increase that happened recently?
