Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano specs

Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano (2006):
Claimed Power: 612 bhp / 620 PS / 456 kW
Actual Power: 635 bhp / 644 PS / 474 kW
Estimated Weight: 1889 kg with driver and fuel
Source of Estimations: TorqueStats *with several adjustments
Imperial acceleration figures (for U.S.):
▪ 0-30 mph: 1.300 s
▪ 0-60 mph: 3.500 s
▪ 0-100 mph: 8.400 s
▪ 0-150 mph: 18.700 s
▪ 0-200 mph: 59.100 s
▪ Top speed: 201.324 mph *average of both directions
▪ 1/4 mile: 11.400 s @ 123.000 mph
▪ 1 mile: 28.200 s @ 175.000 mph
▪ 1' rollout: 0.300 s + 0.600 s (VHT prep)
Metric acceleration figures (for rest of the world):
▪ 0-100 km/h: 4.650 s
▪ 0-200 km/h: 12.500 s
▪ 0-300 km/h: 37.200 s
▪ Top speed: 336.000 km/h
▪ 0-380 m: 11.893 s @ 192.671 km/h
▪ 0-400 m: 12.256 s @ 197.065 km/h
▪ 0-1000 m: 21.957 s @ 255.900 km/h

2006 truly was a special year for sports cars:
-release of Corvette C6 Z06
-release of the 599
-release of the Murcielago LP640
-release of the 997 Turbo and GT3 RS
-release of the BMW Z4 M

Also Ford GT, Carrera GT and Mercedes SLR McLaren were still in production!

0-100 km/h: 3.4 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/9709615247/

Luckily im a member of all 4, And the Poker Club.

@dave Sadly, you have to be a member of either:

a) Illumanati
b) Freemaisons
c) Skull & Bones society
d) The Bohemian Club

.. to add data directly. For normal people only options are to email me (riils at yahoo.com) or just post in this thread: https://fastestlaps.com/articles/data-submission-requests

How do you add stuff on here?

I added this curb weight for ferrari 599 gtb fiorano.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2007-ferrari-599gtb-fiorano0706-feri599-ts.pdf
3953 Ibs 1793 kg.

Change the main photo to the following:

please change the picture.

So beautiful and amazing car! Forza Ferrari!

The species name, canadensis, is fresh new Latin term that means "of Quebec." This species is 76-110 cm (thirty-43 in) lengthy using a 127-180 cm (50-71 in) wing length. Males typically weigh three.two-six.five kg, (7-14 kilos) and will be really aggressive when defending acreage. The female appears extremely related, but is lighter at 2.5-five.5 kg (5.5-12 lbs). Females tend to be ten% physically scaled-down than their male counterparts. #26 Josh Gorges Brendan Gallagher Jersey Corey Crawford Jersey #67 Max Pacioretty Keith Magnuson Jersey Today I need to talk inside Canada Goose jackets of the autumn winter 2011 2012, models from the natural amenities and comfortable perfect for those occasions, casual and versatile, very useful and a head definitely not necessary not fail in our closets! The collection of coats and jackets swiss chriss think both of folks boys and girls who proposes to fashions and trendy but are of high quality and made ??with materials and innovative technology will not clutter, but protect us from the

New Photo.

@ Karthick01: It has a higher top speed.

Can This Car Beat The Mercedes SLR and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 in Straight Line ?.

"m3, so she can go around faster."
nice one Hamcee

I love Top Gear, it's entertaining, but I don't believe half the stuff they claim, the best way to watch it is to turn off your brain and enjoy.

m3, so she can go around faster

"The only popular/reliable car sources out there are magazines and official road testers like Motor Trend and Car & Driver, and also Top Gear." Thats the reason many people are not using those magazines to make final offers. I saw top gear's rating list for cars to buy. It does not make sense at all. They only give high performance cars high rating, in that case they should state they based their selection on performance. For example a woman need a car to go around, would you suggest M3 or 320?

"And don't ever use TopGear as an example or fair play."

What? Top Gear is not fair? Top Gear is the fairest TV show I have ever seen! ;)

The only popular/reliable car sources out there are magazines and official road testers like Motor Trend and Car & Driver, and also Top Gear.

Please, Magazines can cheat as much as anybody else,(Forgoing being biased) And don't ever use TopGear as an example or fair play.

@Shaggy
And YouTube ain't a reliable source either. I know people think their cars are stock, but who knows? The car might be modified.

The only popular/reliable car sources out there are magazines and official road testers like Motor Trend and Car & Driver, and also Top Gear.

You really shouldn't respond, but I know why you would

@ N/A: AOL Autos is not a good source, but at least you weren't using the vimulator, that time would be so unrealistic, my niece would be able to tell that it's fake, and she's 8.

@Shaggy
Where I got the 2.7 to 60 and 9.9 at 126 from was AOL Autos.

@Fangio/CSG
Where I got the 2.7 to 100 (km/h) and 9.9 at 126 (mph) from was AOL Autos.

@Shaggy
2.7 0-60 might be possible on a prepped drag strip. Those Corvette ZR1's running high-mid 10s are surely running 0-60 in the 2sec range.

But a 1/4 mile of 9.9 @ 126mph? Physically impossible. A trap speed like that puts the car firmly into mid-low 11's(though the GT-R manages to run high 10s at similar speeds). Busting into the 9s, the car would have to be pushing 140mph. To do that, the 599 would need 700+hp, a prepped strip, drag radials, about a half-ton diet and a nice tailwind.

Yeah, 2.7 seconds 0-62 MPH and a 1/4 mile tome of 9.9 seconds @ 126 MPH seems too good to be true, this car just doesn't have the power for that kind of acceleration.

"0-100 km/h: 2.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 9.9 seconds at 126 mph
Source: AOL Autos"

No, I do not think so...

@ kellyweewee: LOL at your screen name.

0-100 km/h: 2.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 9.9 seconds at 126 mph
Source: AOL Autos