Image of Ferrari 812 Superfast

Ferrari 812 Superfast specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1630-1753 kg (3594-3865 lbs)
Power / weight 463 ps (457 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 416 Nm (307 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2017
Origin country Italy
Average fuel consumption 14.9 l/100 km (16 mpg US / 19 mpg UK)
Views 45.9k
Submitted by fakekillerfour

Performance

Top speed 342 kph (213 mph)
0 - 40 kph 1.3 s
0 - 50 kph 1.4 s
0 - 60 kph 1.7 s
Est. 0 - 70 kph 2.8 s
0 - 80 kph 2.4 s
Est. 0 - 90 kph 3.5 s
0 - 100 kph 2.9 s
Est. 0 - 110 kph 4.2 s
0 - 120 kph 3.7 s
0 - 130 kph 4.1 s
0 - 140 kph 4.9 s
0 - 150 kph 5.0 s
0 - 160 kph 5.5 s
Est. 0 - 170 kph 7.0 s
Est. 0 - 180 kph 7.6 s
Est. 0 - 190 kph 8.3 s
0 - 200 kph 7.9 s
Est. 0 - 210 kph 9.6 s
0 - 220 kph 9.7 s
Est. 0 - 230 kph 11.4 s
0 - 240 kph 11.7 s
0 - 250 kph 12.9 s
0 - 260 kph 14.1 s
Est. 0 - 270 kph 15.2 s
0 - 280 kph 17.0 s
Est. 0 - 290 kph 18.5 s
0 - 300 kph 21.4 s
0 - 30 mph 1.3 s
0 - 40 mph 1.7 s
0 - 50 mph 2.3 s
0 - 60 mph 2.8 s
0 - 70 mph 3.4 s
0 - 80 mph 4.1 s
0 - 90 mph 4.9 s
0 - 100 mph 5.8 s
0 - 110 mph 6.8 s
Est. 0 - 120 mph 8.5 s
0 - 130 mph 9.3 s
0 - 140 mph 10.7 s
0 - 150 mph 12.7 s
0 - 160 mph 14.9 s
0 - 170 mph 17.6 s
Est. 0 - 180 mph 17.0 s
Est. 0 - 200 mph 25.1 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.2 s @ 113.1 mph
1/4 mile 10.4 s @ 141.2 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 16.8 s @ 175.2 mph
Est. 1 mile 26.4 s @ 203.2 mph
Est. 100 m 5.3 s @ 136.0 kph
1000 m 18.6 s @ 286.6 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph 2.0 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 5.0 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph 12.6 s
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 10.1 s @ 761 ft
Est. max acceleration 0.90 g (9 m/s²)
100 kph - 0 32 m (105 ft)
Est. 120 kph - 0 46 m (150 ft)
130 kph - 0 54 m (177 ft)
Est. 140 kph - 0 61 m (199 ft)
Est. 160 kph - 0 79 m (259 ft)
Est. 180 kph - 0 101 m (331 ft)
Est. 190 kph - 0 110 m (361 ft)
200 kph - 0 127 m (416 ft)
Est. 300 kph - 0 256 m (841 ft)
60 mph - 0 30 m (99 ft)
70 mph - 0 43 m (142 ft)
18m slalom 71.1 kph (44.2 mph)
36m slalom 137.0 kph (85.1 mph)
Est. emissions 356 g/km
Lateral acceleration 1.03 g (10 m/s²)
Ferrari 812 Superfast acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type naturally aspirated V12
Displacement 6.5 l (396 ci / 6496 cc)
Power 800 ps (789 bhp / 588 kw) @ 8500 rpm
Torque 718 Nm (530 lb-ft) @ 7000 rpm
Power / liter 123 ps (121 hp)
Efficiency 54 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 speed dual-clutch
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive
User avatar

User avatar

Freakz  1w ago

812 SF vs GT2 RS Rolling Race:

 


User avatar

dr. cosimo  2w ago

apparently sandbagging was part of the german shit test

spoof as5holes vs quattruoroute both tests run corsa tires

0 - 100: 3.2 vs 3.0
0 - 160: 6.0 vs 5.5
0 - 200: 8.7 vs 8.1

weight: 1746 kg vs 1843 kg (with passenger on board)

power on the dyno was low too and this doesn't happen only when a german fraud gets to test it ? spoofed out as hell with lighter car is slower lol


User avatar

dr. cosimo  2w ago

ferrari test driver did 7.24 and because this time is no threat to the vw-911 lineup they decided to get as close as possible, lol

it's as realistic as it gets for such a super beautiful gt car without bs tires at play or some german natzi crew waiting at the pit lane to load up a custom tune just to prove their dog shit german cars are the fastest.

 

 

User avatar

manone  2w ago

you can clearly see Sportauto trademark Ferrari sandbagging in
hottinger hone. hardly passing from 280 to 300, when it would normally take a blink of an eye. hardly seen a redline ever. I can't even immagine how much of it they spread out along the handling part of the track. They will easily beat this time with a panamera or some pumped up benz-bmw sedan, lol.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  2w ago @manone

spoof auto has a thing when it comes to sandbagging and they will tell you it was too dangerous to push harder because the car does not say made in germaniac

v5ohbrdazl9h.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

EnzoF40forevah  2w ago @manone

As if 4 door Jag is a faster. XE good British car but 812 magnifico!!


User avatar

Tupadre  2w ago @manone

Edith cup2 can do better time. Un a face to face the performance os This car is of the other dimension


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @manone

You do know there’s a huge difference between gps speed and speedo numbers. The 6:52 lap by the Performante was also using gps numbers was definitely slower than the 812 up the hill, despite coming onto the straight faster (it’s a record lap, obviously it’s pushed harder) yet the 812 which is considerably heavier pulled back ahead.

Furthermore it’s on Corsas, it’s not going to go peda to the metal through the bend at the end of the straight.
7:2X for a front engined Ferrari on modest tires is nothing short of great.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  1w ago @saxy

are you being funny or just the usual c0ck-sucker as everyone knows you around here ? you just compared a stripped out huracan with a roll cage doesn't exist for the consumers ride and a special bucket seat with super sticky tires tested by factory driver. pull your fukcing head out of your vag-group-ina you dimwit $2 wh0re.

i hope you give up your stupid ways of explaining why car a is slower than car b. give it up, you were born a f@ggot and you will end up od'ing under your moms bed while she attends the next customer.


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

listen to me, sportauto hit 301kph with amg gt r, and 305kph with
812 as top gps speed at dottinger hone, ok? are you following the
argument? all right: 812 takes 8.5 fùcking seconds less than
amg gt r from 200-300kph. do you realize how much faster would 812 be going if you allowed it accelerating 8.5secs longer?


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

just wanted to clarify i did not mean that 8.5 secs less from 200-300kph amounts to 8.5 seconds less track time in dottinger hone
straght, of course.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  1w ago @manone

^ saxy is a lonely scumbag that chews on leftovers that drop by his mommy's place to perform some yoga moves under the bed sheet, so do not expect him to understand within one or two sentences. it will take a hammer and a wrench to get the message into his thickhead.

whoever watched the video mentioned that the driver, chirsty gundamhurt didn't go all the way and was holding back like a nanny inside a bar.

the car was lighter with spoof auto-scheisse but turned out to be slower in terms of acceleration and the track.

doesn't this raise a big question about how poor they perform whenever they test anything beside a vw pos product ?


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @manone

By that argument then the amg GTR would have been some 10-12 seconds faster to 300kph than the Huracan who was on factory driver and optimum conditions. Would you ever have stopped to think that perhaps that GTR was boosted way beyond the hp it should have had. Makes no sense that it would blow a Performante into the woods even with a factory driver behind it.


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @dr. cosimo

Nobody takes your word Seriously on any matter on this forum. The only lonely scumbag that does nothing good for this world is you.

Stay on your path and be an internet troll. Nobody in the world will care or remember you. Enjoy.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  1w ago @saxy

you are rated as the #1 scumbag pos on this board and everyone knows it, you being the hypocrite c*nt that never ceases to amaze everyone with his bs avatar and bad mouthing anything other than vw tractors.

and i do enjoy poking little b*tches that feeds on german crotches like yourself, it sure as hell is fun hahahahahahaha

can i squeeze your nipples you thickheaded half breed cuckoo-cuckoo ? i'll buy you a vw 911 postcard


User avatar

Tyrone1  1w ago @saxy

a 911 turbo S got up to 299kph on the straight. 812 did 304. Both of these are gps measured speeds. Can you explain this?

580bhp vs 800bhp. Roughly the same weight. Its sandbagging. plain and simple.


User avatar

Tyrone1  1w ago @saxy

a 911 turbo S got up to 299kph on the straight. 812 did 304. Both of these are gps measured speeds. Can you explain this?

580bhp vs 800bhp. Roughly the same weight. Its sandbagging. plain and simple.


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @manone

Manone. Finally had time to look at the footage. And rethink what the hell were you trying to say.
Dude, you are completely pulling things out of your ass to blatantly justify your prejudice.
The 812 reached 300kph while still going UPHILL before the end of the straight. In fact the GTR actually took a full 10 seconds later than the 812 to reach 300kph in the video only when the car hit the DOWNHILL section and only managed to hit that speed cuz it could go full throttle through the bend before the downhill section. The Ferrari can't do that on Corsa tires. They had to slow down.. in fact even for the GT2rs run they slowed down for the bend as well. So if you ask me how much faster would the 812 be going if you allowed it accelerating 8.5s longer... it would be in the trees.

And btw, the GPS speed on the 812 may not be correct. When the 812 hit 300kph on the indicated gps, the car itself showed 318kph.


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @Tyrone1

First of all, you know plenty well the Porsche has more than 580hp. It's smaller, and lighter so has less drag and less weight to pull around.

At the exact point the 812 hit 300kph it crossed a red sign on the right. At that point the 911 was doing 294, while the GTR was doing 292. Only after a full 6 seconds did the 911 hit 299 when the hill flattened out. 10seconds for the GTR while going downhill... So he certainly wasn't sandbagging on the acceleration part.
That following corner can't be taken faster than 300kph (or at least the driver won't on a car with Corsas) The 812 had a min speed of 286, while the 911 had 291. To be fair he took that corner faster than he did in the 720s which he slowed down to 274kph (most likely because he over sped into it from 318kph).
The driver is clearly not perfect but I'm afraid you picked the wrong part of the track to call him "sand bagging" I'm sure there were many other corners where he could have gone faster.


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @dr. cosimo

yeah man nice work man. amazing. Keep doing what you're doing. I literally do not read any crap you write, but I have a good laugh seeing how busy I am doing great things with my life and you... well being such a bad ass on the internet. I could only dream of the things you do, except I'm busy making my dreams come true. I literally can buy something like a 720s in cash right now, I am not joking. 4 years ago when I just joined this forum I was having trouble paying rent, counting my days I had to wait for my next pay cheque. Hell I feel way too lucky and fortunate. Maybe it is right for you to curse at me. Life shouldn't be good. So please help keep my life balanced. thank you so much.


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

i see you are bothered by the uphill/downhill irrelevance. Let's rule
this completely out, then. At the beginning of dottinger hone 812 goes at 183kph, while amg gt-r at 197kph, right? from then on, are 16secs of plain and simple flat out straight line acceleration, no
uphill, no downhill, no excuses. After those 16 seconds 812 is
9kph faster than amg gt-r. Now, check out some vids in which the two cars are acceleration tested, for instance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHXZZr6srTE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFkl76gJum8
16 seconds after 812 hits 178kph it has reached a speed almost 30kph higher than what amg gt-r has reached 16 seconds after
197kph. Which begs the question: why at nurburgring 812 is
NOT going almost 30kph faster than amg gt-r, but only 9kph??


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @manone

Wow. You really are stupid. You’re using a speedo speed as your reference? The 812 was shown going 318kph when the gps said 300kph. That discredits your random youtube example already.

You said they started the straight with the 812 down 14kph? Obviously because the 812 tires are WAY less sticky. You should know better than that. None the less, by the time the 812 hits 300, it’s made a +22kph over the GTR via gps speed. The 812 just about pegged GTR at 240 at the bridge and hit 300kph 10 full seconds sooner than the GTR which never let go of full throttle.

Haha man... I thought you were better than this

Dude go find another part of the track to prove your sandbagging. You’re simply just wrong right here.


User avatar

saxy  1w ago @manone

Rewatched the video to double check again. The gps speed pinned at 300kph, while the car kept going from 312-318kph.

That means neither speedo nor gps was correct. The speedo speed was obviously too optimistic, but even if so, the gps speed should be rising proportionally to the speedo.

Explains why it seems to you that the 812 wasn’t going faster than it should.


User avatar

Tyrone1  1w ago @saxy

Its actually not that much lighter, and im fairly certain the 812 cuts through the air more cleanly than a turbo s. Also we all know the porsche has more than 580 hp, i was just citing numbers. But even if it is making 600+, something is still fishy.

Look i know the 812 isnt as fast as a 720s. But for the 720s to be 318kph and the 812 304kph AND the 720s brakes early just goes to show something is wrong.

Im not even a ferrari fanboy (Pref mclaren), nor am i trying to be the devils advocate. I can just see something is quite clearly wrong with the acceleration of a 789bhp car.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  1w ago @saxy

nobody cares whether you can buy a chinese dild0 or a japanese one, who even asked what you can afford ? it's the internet you d1pshit i'm sure you can tell everyone here you can afford a classic ferrari too, like anyone would even give a flying-fukc.

are you going to fess up and tell us you have a bf too ? or br2+ is your first crush ?


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

poor man, you are brain limited...you fully don't get it, right?
the difference between speedometers is consistent with the
difference between gps, unless you are able to convince anybody that ferraris' tacho are more optimistic than mercedes' tacho, lol.
Obviously, 30 kmh TACHO difference corresponds to about 30kmh GPS DIFFERENCE at similar speeds.

Nobody said anything about why 812 is 14kph down amg gt-r at the beginning of the straight, ìdiot. The point is WHY in the world 812 is
not 25-30kph GPS up amg gt-r 16 seconds in dottinger hone, just like
it is TACHO in the video i posted to you. there is a good 15-20kmh missing in 812 speed in that straight. Can't imagine what gebhardt did in other sections of the track, where he has the tyres excuse...


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

" None the less, by the time the 812 hits 300, it’s made a +22kph over the GTR via gps speed"

nobody said anything about the gained speed. I was talking about
the DIFFERENCE in speed at the time t. at t=0, ferrari is -14kph, while at t=16secs ferrari should be at about +30kph, while it is just at +9kph. In terms of gained speed, 812 should have gained
about 40-45kmh over amg gt-r, while it only gained 23kmh.


User avatar

manone  1w ago @saxy

"Rewatched the video to double check again. The gps speed pinned at 300kph, while the car kept going from 312-318kph."

dùmb AND blind.

"The speedo speed was obviously too optimistic, but even if so, the gps speed should be rising proportionally to the speedo."

here are some random readings gps (tacho): 281 (293),
289 (300), 297 (308), 300 (313), 304 (315). the discrepancy is
consistently 9-13kph at those speeds. tacho is a bit jerky of course.


User avatar

dr. cosimo  1w ago @manone

the next thing he'll tell you is, he can travel through time and is able to see the test live right in front of his and report back lolololol

he's a d1ckeater and a stubborn one, you offer him a pretzel he'll refuse to taste anything beside german big d1ck scrolling all the way into his brain.

be careful he doesn't go b@tshit on you and starts screaming at your face shazaaaam!!!!!!!!! hahahahahahahaha

poor kid must be affected by all these comic super heroes.


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  2m ago

 


User avatar

meatbag  3m ago

Another underperforming garbage from shitrrari.


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  5m ago

550x800m


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  5m ago

 


User avatar

BR2+  5m ago

@FastestLaps, You should get rid of all these estimates on the car pages, They clotter up all the info


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  5m ago

550x800m

Anglesey Coastal 1:13.6

0-60 mph 3.1
0-100 mph 6.2
0-150 mph 13.1
Our first practice runs are dynamite, the 812 firing off the line with not even a hint of wheelspin before smashing through 60mph in 3.0sec (Ferrari claims 2.9sec to 62mph) and 100mph In 5.9sec. However, by the time we come to record the full 0-150mph test the already heady ambient temperature has risen significantly, which is never a good thing for extracting the maximum from any internal combustion engine. Still, resulting 0-60mph time is only a tenth behind our earlier effort, while 150mph comes and goes in just 13.1sec


User avatar

dddd  5m ago

 

They tested Ferrari 812 using v-box and the results are pretty good :

  • 0-60 mp/h in 3,06s
  • 0-100 mp/h in 6,27s
  • 60-130 mp/h in 6,95s
  • 100-200 km/h in 6s

User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  5m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  5m ago

 


User avatar

Tupadre  5m ago

Where is the news Monza SP1 and SP2???



User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  6m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  6m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  7m ago

 


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago

AlVolante tested the 812 recently:
0-60 km/h in 3.0 secs
0-80 km/h in 4.0 secs
0-100 km/h in 5.0 secs
0-120 km/h in 5.9 secs
0-140 km/h in 6.7 secs
0-160 km/h in 7.5 secs
0-180 km/h in 8.8 secs
0-200 km/h in 10.2 secs
0-400 m in 12.13 secs
0-1000 m in 20.47 secs
100-0 km/h in 36.32 m
Maximum cornering grip is 1.19 g


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  9m ago

[image redacted]


User avatar

fakekillerfour  9m ago

http://www.motortrend.com/news/2018-ferrari-812-superfast-first-test-review/

0-60mph 2.8 sec
Quarter mile 10.4 sec @ 138.6 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph 99 feet
Lateral acceleration 1.03 g (avg)
MT Figure Eight 23.3 sec @ 0.93 g (avg)


User avatar

hostboy  9m ago

[2018 Ferrari 812 Superfast] Motor Trend 7/2018 test results [published in "Ultimate Grand Tourers" page on this issue date]:
0-30 mph = 1.4 s
0-40 mph = 2.0 s
0-50 mph = 2.5 s
0-60 mph = 2.9 s
0-70 mph = 3.6 s
0-80 mph = 4.7 s
0-90 mph = 5.9 s
0-100 mph = 7.3 s
1/4-mile = 11.6 s / 128.2 mph
Figure-8 = 22.3 s / 0.93 g
Lateral acceleration = 1.12 g
Willow Springs = 83.00 s


User avatar

hostboy  9m ago

[2018 Ferrari 812 Superfast] Auto Express 6/2018 test results (second gear launch without launch control):
0-30 mph = 2.1 s
0-40 mph = 2.7 s
0-50 mph = 3.3 s
0-60 mph = 3.9 s
0-70 mph = 4.5 s
0-80 mph = 5.1 s
0-90 mph = 5.7 s
0-100 mph = 6.3 s
0-110 mph = 7.2 s
0-120 mph = 7.8 s
0-130 mph = 8.9 s
0-140 mph = 10.5 s (1/4-mile: 11.3/144)
0-150 mph = 12.1 s

0-150-0 mph = 18.1 s
0-100-0 mph = 10.9 s

The only results revealed with first gear launch and launch control use are a 3.3sec 0-60 time and a 10.8sec quarter-mile time.


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  9m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  9m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  10m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  10m ago

 


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  10m ago

Ferrari dealer told me yesterday that the Ferrari have said the 812 is 1/2 a second quicker a lap at Fiorano, than a TDF!
https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/threads/f12-vs-812.550655/


User avatar

igorgerasimchuk  11m ago

 


User avatar

Freakz  11m ago

812 Superfast 0-300 km/h:

 


User avatar

Freakz  11m ago

812 Superfast goes up to 358 km/h (Germany Highway):