Ferrari 812 Superfast specs

you can clearly see Sportauto trademark Ferrari sandbagging in
hottinger hone. hardly passing from 280 to 300, when it would normally take a blink of an eye. hardly seen a redline ever. I can't even immagine how much of it they spread out along the handling part of the track. They will easily beat this time with a panamera or some pumped up benz-bmw sedan, lol.

spoof auto has a thing when it comes to sandbagging and they will tell you it was too dangerous to push harder because the car does not say made in germaniac

As if 4 door Jag is a faster. XE good British car but 812 magnifico!!

Edith cup2 can do better time. Un a face to face the performance os This car is of the other dimension

You do know there’s a huge difference between gps speed and speedo numbers. The 6:52 lap by the Performante was also using gps numbers was definitely slower than the 812 up the hill, despite coming onto the straight faster (it’s a record lap, obviously it’s pushed harder) yet the 812 which is considerably heavier pulled back ahead.

Furthermore it’s on Corsas, it’s not going to go peda to the metal through the bend at the end of the straight.
7:2X for a front engined Ferrari on modest tires is nothing short of great.

are you being funny or just the usual c0ck-sucker as everyone knows you around here ? you just compared a stripped out huracan with a roll cage doesn't exist for the consumers ride and a special bucket seat with super sticky tires tested by factory driver. pull your fukcing head out of your vag-group-ina you dimwit $2 wh0re.

i hope you give up your stupid ways of explaining why car a is slower than car b. give it up, you were born a f@ggot and you will end up od'ing under your moms bed while she attends the next customer.

listen to me, sportauto hit 301kph with amg gt r, and 305kph with
812 as top gps speed at dottinger hone, ok? are you following the
argument? all right: 812 takes 8.5 fùcking seconds less than
amg gt r from 200-300kph. do you realize how much faster would 812 be going if you allowed it accelerating 8.5secs longer?

just wanted to clarify i did not mean that 8.5 secs less from 200-300kph amounts to 8.5 seconds less track time in dottinger hone
straght, of course.

^ saxy is a lonely scumbag that chews on leftovers that drop by his mommy's place to perform some yoga moves under the bed sheet, so do not expect him to understand within one or two sentences. it will take a hammer and a wrench to get the message into his thickhead.

whoever watched the video mentioned that the driver, chirsty gundamhurt didn't go all the way and was holding back like a nanny inside a bar.

the car was lighter with spoof auto-scheisse but turned out to be slower in terms of acceleration and the track.

doesn't this raise a big question about how poor they perform whenever they test anything beside a vw pos product ?

By that argument then the amg GTR would have been some 10-12 seconds faster to 300kph than the Huracan who was on factory driver and optimum conditions. Would you ever have stopped to think that perhaps that GTR was boosted way beyond the hp it should have had. Makes no sense that it would blow a Performante into the woods even with a factory driver behind it.

Nobody takes your word Seriously on any matter on this forum. The only lonely scumbag that does nothing good for this world is you.

Stay on your path and be an internet troll. Nobody in the world will care or remember you. Enjoy.

you are rated as the #1 scumbag pos on this board and everyone knows it, you being the hypocrite c*nt that never ceases to amaze everyone with his bs avatar and bad mouthing anything other than vw tractors.

and i do enjoy poking little b*tches that feeds on german crotches like yourself, it sure as hell is fun hahahahahahaha

can i squeeze your nipples you thickheaded half breed cuckoo-cuckoo ? i'll buy you a vw 911 postcard

a 911 turbo S got up to 299kph on the straight. 812 did 304. Both of these are gps measured speeds. Can you explain this?

580bhp vs 800bhp. Roughly the same weight. Its sandbagging. plain and simple.

a 911 turbo S got up to 299kph on the straight. 812 did 304. Both of these are gps measured speeds. Can you explain this?

580bhp vs 800bhp. Roughly the same weight. Its sandbagging. plain and simple.

Manone. Finally had time to look at the footage. And rethink what the hell were you trying to say.
Dude, you are completely pulling things out of your ass to blatantly justify your prejudice.
The 812 reached 300kph while still going UPHILL before the end of the straight. In fact the GTR actually took a full 10 seconds later than the 812 to reach 300kph in the video only when the car hit the DOWNHILL section and only managed to hit that speed cuz it could go full throttle through the bend before the downhill section. The Ferrari can't do that on Corsa tires. They had to slow down.. in fact even for the GT2rs run they slowed down for the bend as well. So if you ask me how much faster would the 812 be going if you allowed it accelerating 8.5s longer... it would be in the trees.

And btw, the GPS speed on the 812 may not be correct. When the 812 hit 300kph on the indicated gps, the car itself showed 318kph.

First of all, you know plenty well the Porsche has more than 580hp. It's smaller, and lighter so has less drag and less weight to pull around.

At the exact point the 812 hit 300kph it crossed a red sign on the right. At that point the 911 was doing 294, while the GTR was doing 292. Only after a full 6 seconds did the 911 hit 299 when the hill flattened out. 10seconds for the GTR while going downhill... So he certainly wasn't sandbagging on the acceleration part.
That following corner can't be taken faster than 300kph (or at least the driver won't on a car with Corsas) The 812 had a min speed of 286, while the 911 had 291. To be fair he took that corner faster than he did in the 720s which he slowed down to 274kph (most likely because he over sped into it from 318kph).
The driver is clearly not perfect but I'm afraid you picked the wrong part of the track to call him "sand bagging" I'm sure there were many other corners where he could have gone faster.

yeah man nice work man. amazing. Keep doing what you're doing. I literally do not read any crap you write, but I have a good laugh seeing how busy I am doing great things with my life and you... well being such a bad ass on the internet. I could only dream of the things you do, except I'm busy making my dreams come true. I literally can buy something like a 720s in cash right now, I am not joking. 4 years ago when I just joined this forum I was having trouble paying rent, counting my days I had to wait for my next pay cheque. Hell I feel way too lucky and fortunate. Maybe it is right for you to curse at me. Life shouldn't be good. So please help keep my life balanced. thank you so much.

i see you are bothered by the uphill/downhill irrelevance. Let's rule
this completely out, then. At the beginning of dottinger hone 812 goes at 183kph, while amg gt-r at 197kph, right? from then on, are 16secs of plain and simple flat out straight line acceleration, no
uphill, no downhill, no excuses. After those 16 seconds 812 is
9kph faster than amg gt-r. Now, check out some vids in which the two cars are acceleration tested, for instance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHXZZr6srTE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFkl76gJum8
16 seconds after 812 hits 178kph it has reached a speed almost 30kph higher than what amg gt-r has reached 16 seconds after
197kph. Which begs the question: why at nurburgring 812 is
NOT going almost 30kph faster than amg gt-r, but only 9kph??

Wow. You really are stupid. You’re using a speedo speed as your reference? The 812 was shown going 318kph when the gps said 300kph. That discredits your random youtube example already.

You said they started the straight with the 812 down 14kph? Obviously because the 812 tires are WAY less sticky. You should know better than that. None the less, by the time the 812 hits 300, it’s made a +22kph over the GTR via gps speed. The 812 just about pegged GTR at 240 at the bridge and hit 300kph 10 full seconds sooner than the GTR which never let go of full throttle.

Haha man... I thought you were better than this

Dude go find another part of the track to prove your sandbagging. You’re simply just wrong right here.

Rewatched the video to double check again. The gps speed pinned at 300kph, while the car kept going from 312-318kph.

That means neither speedo nor gps was correct. The speedo speed was obviously too optimistic, but even if so, the gps speed should be rising proportionally to the speedo.

Explains why it seems to you that the 812 wasn’t going faster than it should.

Its actually not that much lighter, and im fairly certain the 812 cuts through the air more cleanly than a turbo s. Also we all know the porsche has more than 580 hp, i was just citing numbers. But even if it is making 600+, something is still fishy.

Look i know the 812 isnt as fast as a 720s. But for the 720s to be 318kph and the 812 304kph AND the 720s brakes early just goes to show something is wrong.

Im not even a ferrari fanboy (Pref mclaren), nor am i trying to be the devils advocate. I can just see something is quite clearly wrong with the acceleration of a 789bhp car.

nobody cares whether you can buy a chinese dild0 or a japanese one, who even asked what you can afford ? it's the internet you d1pshit i'm sure you can tell everyone here you can afford a classic ferrari too, like anyone would even give a flying-fukc.

are you going to fess up and tell us you have a bf too ? or br2+ is your first crush ?

poor man, you are brain limited...you fully don't get it, right?
the difference between speedometers is consistent with the
difference between gps, unless you are able to convince anybody that ferraris' tacho are more optimistic than mercedes' tacho, lol.
Obviously, 30 kmh TACHO difference corresponds to about 30kmh GPS DIFFERENCE at similar speeds.

Nobody said anything about why 812 is 14kph down amg gt-r at the beginning of the straight, ìdiot. The point is WHY in the world 812 is
not 25-30kph GPS up amg gt-r 16 seconds in dottinger hone, just like
it is TACHO in the video i posted to you. there is a good 15-20kmh missing in 812 speed in that straight. Can't imagine what gebhardt did in other sections of the track, where he has the tyres excuse...

" None the less, by the time the 812 hits 300, it’s made a +22kph over the GTR via gps speed"

nobody said anything about the gained speed. I was talking about
the DIFFERENCE in speed at the time t. at t=0, ferrari is -14kph, while at t=16secs ferrari should be at about +30kph, while it is just at +9kph. In terms of gained speed, 812 should have gained
about 40-45kmh over amg gt-r, while it only gained 23kmh.

"Rewatched the video to double check again. The gps speed pinned at 300kph, while the car kept going from 312-318kph."

dùmb AND blind.

"The speedo speed was obviously too optimistic, but even if so, the gps speed should be rising proportionally to the speedo."

here are some random readings gps (tacho): 281 (293),
289 (300), 297 (308), 300 (313), 304 (315). the discrepancy is
consistently 9-13kph at those speeds. tacho is a bit jerky of course.

the next thing he'll tell you is, he can travel through time and is able to see the test live right in front of his and report back lolololol

he's a d1ckeater and a stubborn one, you offer him a pretzel he'll refuse to taste anything beside german big d1ck scrolling all the way into his brain.

be careful he doesn't go b@tshit on you and starts screaming at your face shazaaaam!!!!!!!!! hahahahahahahaha

poor kid must be affected by all these comic super heroes.