Someone's crashed a Ferrari Enzo in Holland! It's a right bloody mess!

https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a38801968/ferrari-enzo-crash-netherlands/

Oo

Price in US | $643,330 - $652,830 |

Car type | Coupe |

Curb weight | 1365-1479 kg (3009-3261 lbs) |

Dimensions | 4.70 m (185 in) long, 2.04 m (80 in) wide, 1.15 m (45 in) high |

Wheelbase | 2.65 m (104 in) |

Introduced | 2002 |

Origin country | Italy |

Views | 212k |

0 - 30 mph | 1.3 s |

0 - 40 mph | 1.8 s |

0 - 50 mph | 2.3 s |

0 - 60 mph | 3.1 s |

0 - 70 mph | 3.7 s |

0 - 80 mph | 4.9 s |

0 - 90 mph | 5.7 s |

0 - 100 mph | 6.4 s |

0 - 110 mph | 8.0 s |

0 - 120 mph | 9.2 s |

0 - 130 mph | 10.3 s |

0 - 150 mph | 15.9 s |

Est. 1/8 mile | 7.8 s @ 106.3 mph |

1/4 mile | 11.0 s @ 133.6 mph |

Est. 1/2 mile | 18.1 s @ 164.0 mph |

0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s |

0 - 60 kph | 2.2 s |

0 - 80 kph | 2.7 s |

0 - 100 kph | 3.6 s |

0 - 180 kph | 9.1 s |

0 - 200 kph | 10.3 s |

0 - 250 kph | 16.1 s |

0 - 300 kph | 26.1 s |

1000 m | 19.6 s @ 278.0 kph |

Est. 100 - 200 kph | 6.7 s |

Est. 200 - 300 kph | 15.8 s |

Top speed | 355 kph (221 mph) |

0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.0 s |

Est. max acceleration | 0.84 g (8 m/s²) |

Lateral acceleration | 1.05 g (10 m/s²) |

Downforce @ 200 kph | 344 kg (758 lbs) |

Downforce @ 300 kph | 775 kg (1709 lbs) |

60 mph - 0 | 32 m (106 ft) |

70 mph - 0 | 46 m (151 ft) |

100 mph - 0 | 88 m (289 ft) |

Engine type | V12 |

Displacement | 6.0 l (366 ci) |

Power | 660 ps (651 bhp / 485 kw) @ 7800 rpm |

Torque | 657 Nm (485 lb-ft) @ 5500 rpm |

Power / liter | 110 ps (108 hp) |

Power / weight | 456 ps (450 bhp) / t |

Torque / weight | 454 Nm (335 lb-ft) / t |

Transmission | 6 speed |

Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |

ChironSS 3d ago

Someone's crashed a Ferrari Enzo in Holland! It's a right bloody mess!

https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a38801968/ferrari-enzo-crash-netherlands/

Oo

FastestLaps 3d ago

With these legendary cars its like "oh, shoot, is the car ok? aaah ok. and what about the driver?".

Car is the real casualty in these dumb crashes.

On other hand - most Enzos are garage queens these days anyway. So at least this one had a blast...

dr. cosimo 3d ago @FastestLaps

'Car is the real casualty in these dumb crashes.'

'It's not clear who was behind the wheel or how the car ended up in this state.'

since they say it's not clear who was or how it happened and the corrupt system in netherlands does not prosecute members of the public for possession or use of small quantities of soft drugs, we'll just have to blame it on musk for introducing autonomous driving technology.

hostboy 1m ago

Please add:

0-100km/h in 3.27

0-200km/h in 9.50

https://www.autobild.de/bilder/ferrari-enzo-ferrari-16869.html#bild11

Factory figures were 3.65 and 9.65.

ChironSS 1m ago

https://www.ferrari.com/en-BN/auto/enzo-ferrari

Quote>"ACCELERATION 0-1000 M 19.60sec."

The above figure is a manufacturer claim. Which is fine, it's Ferrari afterall. But it's not really admissible when making comparison tests.

I am aware of it's real time, which I'm looking to verify shortly

hostboy 3m ago

Estimates for Ferrari Enzo reconfigured!

0-30 MPH: 1.6 sec

0-40 MPH: 2.1 sec

0-50 MPH: 2.6 sec

0-60 MPH: 3.1 sec (100 km/h: 3,2)

0-70 MPH: 3.7 sec

0-80 MPH: 4.4 sec

0-90 MPH: 5.3 sec

0-100 MPH: 6.3 sec

0-120 MPH: 8.6 sec (200 km/h: 9,3)

0-150 MPH: 14.8 sec (250 km/h: 16,1)

0-180 MPH: 25.7 sec (300 km/h: 28,9)

0-200 MPH: 37.1 sec

Top Speed: 210.3491 mph (338.5240 km/h)

3.1+6.3/(3.1+6.3)x12 = 11.15sec standing quartermile time at 134 mph.

Acceleration off the line = 7.140235 m/s2 = 0.73 G = 0.3sec rollout = 10.85sec dragstrip quartermile time.

Engine speed @ maximum torque [rpm]

5500

Engine speed @ maximum power [rpm]

8200

Gear ratios [-] Gearbox

3.15,2.18,1.57,1.19,0.94,0.76

Differential

3.7

Wheel static radius [m]

0.362

Driveline efficiency [-]

0.85

Wheel (tire) friction coefficient [-]

1

Rear axle load coefficient [-]

1

Vehicle mass (curb) [kg]

1709 (pre-125mph); 2140 (125-185mph); 1950 (post-185mph) - including downforce figures

Driver mass [kg]

75

Aerodynamic drag coefficient [-]

0.36

Ambient air density [kg/m3]

1.202

Vehicle frontal area [m2]

1.91

Road slope [%]

0.00

Road load coefficient [-]

0.011

Engine speed points (full load) [rpm]

3000,5500,7800

Engine static torque points (full load) [Nm]

525.6,657,594

Simulation time [s]

60

hostboy 3m ago

Corrected simulator results:

...

Increased driveline efficiency to 1

Increased road load coefficient to 0.064

Decreased torque at 8200rpm (by a very slight bit from 565 Nm) to 563.7613 Nm to match the 353.1688km/h top speed of the previous simulation

...

Reverted driveline efficiency to 0.85

Increased static friction to 1.171

Decreased ambient air density to 0.959

Increased road slope to 0.008%

Increased torque at 8200rpm (by a very slight bit from 563.7613 Nm) to 563.7673 Nm

The good news: 0-100 in 3"65, 0-200 in 9"00, 0-300 in 23"01, and a flat-out vmax figure of 353.2753km/h (219.5151mph)!

I'll admit that the 0-300 time is pushing it, but if we compare with AMuS' Enzo (that had two people in it instead of one), that particular car was only 1.8sec slower in real life than in the simulator where no passenger is present.

What will happen if I add an extra 775kg to the car (as in downforce)? That's basically the same as fitting an 850kg driver into the 1365kg car, or a 75kg driver into a 2140kg car.

0-200 will be 12"58 and 0-300 will be 39"82. But that doesn't make any sense since that will result in a barely 322km/h top speed.

Ferrari's claims for 0-400m (11-flat) and top speed (350km/h) are optimistic, I'll admit. If we average these out, the 0-200 two-way average should come out as 10"79, and a positive three-way average for 0-300 should be 27"21 (see note).

Note: (23.01+((23.01+39.82)/2))/2 = 27.21sec

As for top speed: (321.9577+353.2753)/2 = 337.6165 km/h average (similar to Motor Trend result and Car & Driver estimate)

As for curb weight: 1365kg is optimistic. (2140+1365)/2 = 1752.5; (1752.5+1365)/2 = **1558.75kg** for US-spec cars; (1558.75+1365)/2 = **1461.875kg** for Euro-spec cars. Ferrari wasn't lying about the curb weight (the *dry weight* is 1255kg); however, they typically rely on what some people call a "dry curb weight," which basically is the curb weight with an empty gas tank, no coolants and no other essentials.

Regarding the 0-100km/h and quartermile times: (9/10.79)*3.65 should enter the Enzo to its first century in just 3.05sec, but since we know that it won't do that, let's assume instead we took it on a dragstrip and the driver selected the quickest mode possible for optimistic shifting times and points; (3.05+3.65)/2 = 3.35sec to 100km/h!

That's right: the Enzo's *claimed* 0-100km/h time is WITHOUT a rollout. However, the 0-400m figure of 11-flat is WITH a rollout. This is verifiable by using this metric: (3.65+9.3)/2 = 6.50 to 160km/h or 6.55 to 100mph. 3.65*.95 = 3.45 to 60mph (all figures rounded to nearest 0.05s).

3.45+6.55/(3.45+6.55)*12 = 11.30 sec quartermile time. That means the Enzo relies on a 0.30sec rollout for quartermile. 11.30 - 0.30 = 3.15 to 60, 6.25 to 100, and 11.00 in the quartermile. But Ferrari claimed 400m, not quartermile; so we add an extra 0.05s to be a little bit more scientific. 3.20, 6.30, and 11.05 in the quartermile. Those are pretty much identical results to the McLaren F1 (except the F1 was stated to do the quarter in 11.1).

The Enzo is not a moderately powerful AWD sports car, so 3.15 divided by 3.35 shows a sign that the car likely had too much traction; 3.20 by 3.35 however makes more sense because it was a strongly powerful REAR-wheel-drive hypercar-of-its-day (still a supercar by today's performance standards).

If ambient air density is reverted to the default, that 9-flat becomes a 9.15 (200km/h); 23.01 becomes 26.94 (to 300km/h); 329.0960 is the new 353.2753km/h.

hostboy 3m ago

Acceleration Stats For 2003-2004 Ferrari Enzo:

0-10 MPH: 0.57 sec (20 km/h: 0,72 s)

0-20 MPH: 1.16 sec (40 km/h: 1,44 s)

0-30 MPH: 1.74 sec (50 km/h: 1,81 s)

0-40 MPH: 2.33 sec (60 km/h: 2,17 s)

0-50 MPH: 2.92 sec (80 km/h: 2,91 s)

0-60 MPH: 3.52 sec (100 km/h: 3,65 s)

0-70 MPH: 4.12 sec (120 km/h: 4,40 s)

0-80 MPH: 4.75 sec (130 km/h: 4,81 s)

0-90 MPH: 5.47 sec (140 km/h: 5,25 s)

0-100 MPH: 6.23 sec (160 km/h: 6,18 s)

0-110 MPH: 7.11 sec (180 km/h: 7,30 s)

0-120 MPH: 8.18 sec (200 km/h: 8,65 s)

0-130 MPH: 9.32 sec (220 km/h: 10,13 s)

0-140 MPH: 10.56 sec (240 km/h: 12,06 s)

0-150 MPH: 12.22 sec (250 km/h: 13,18 s)

0-160 MPH: 14.06 sec (260 km/h: 14,35 s)

0-170 MPH: 16.12 sec (280 km/h: 17,02 s)

0-180 MPH: 18.83 sec (300 km/h: 21,25 s)

0-190 MPH: 22.79 sec (320 km/h: 27,33 s)

0-200 MPH: 28.03 sec (330 km/h: 31,52 s)

Top Speed: 219.4489 mph (353.1688 km/h) -- vmax deadline: 60 seconds

https://x-engineer.org/projects/vehicle-acceleration-performance-online-calculator/

Engine speed @ maximum torque [rpm]

5500

Engine speed @ maximum power [rpm]

8200

Gear ratios [-] Gearbox

3.15,2.18,1.57,1.19,0.94,0.76

Differential

4.1

Wheel static radius [m]

0.362

Driveline efficiency [-]

0.85

Wheel (tire) friction coefficient [-]

1.10

Rear axle load coefficient [-]

0.721

Vehicle mass (curb) [kg]

1365

Driver mass [kg]

75

Aerodynamic drag coefficient [-]

0.36

Ambient air density [kg/m3]

1.202

Vehicle frontal area [m2]

1.91

Road slope [%]

0.00

Road load coefficient [-]

0.011

Engine speed points (full load) [rpm]

5500,7800,8200

Engine static torque points (full load) [Nm]

657,594,565

Simulation time [s]

60

Top speed is performed at 28rpm above redline.

ChironSS 5m ago

https://www.amarisupercars.com/detail/228514/ferrari-enzo-fxx-petrol-coupe-lhd-evoluzione-6-3-

Quote>"This car has been converted to road legal use. This is not only a technical fete, it's a political one also. It had to go back to the factory for the work and they took some persuading to allow the conversion. Only they had the parts. All the work is documented and photographed. And still have all the original parts so it could be converted back to track spec if required. The spare parts are in a special flight case liveried FXX Programme."

This is UNICORN level stuff! I LOVE this kind of engineering and techincal detail.

Ferrari as a *manufacturer* carried out the road legal conversion (changes detailed in link) to full legal rules and regulations. Unbelievable and far above in provenance to third party re engineered ones.

And the price was over £12 million pounds plus taxes.

It sold. Lucky individual. And filthy rich.

ChironSS 7m ago

I remember picking up my usual Wednesday morning copy of Autocar and Motor from WH Smith's when the Ferrari Enzo debuted in production form. My initial impressions were mixed. I LOVED the new 6.0 litre V12 from Ferrari, who wouldn't? But the styling and name took much longer to acclimatise to! It's special as it's top of the line Ferrari and the exhaust note is compelling beautiful. Just like the F355 V8.

aaayy 2y ago

This has always been my favorite Ferrari. The design did nothing for me, but it's more functional than flare. The engine, while not being an actual F1 engine like in the F50, is F1 inspired and makes 660 horsepower, which is still crazy for a non-turbo engine. It's got the transmission straight of a Ferrari F1 car, and a F1 traction control, drag reduction, and transmission modes, one of the first cars to have it. It's got F1-style electronically controlled independent suspension. It's also got F1 brakes and a carbon monocoque and body. The car also has an active-aero system, like modern F1 cars, and insane performance. 0-60 in 3.1 and an 11.0 second 1/4 mile is pretty impressive, let alone the 221 mph top speed.

Thiago_Lins 4y ago

What would Enzo do with current Pirelli or Michellin tires at the Nürburgring? 7:25.21 is very good for a 2002 car!

Inline 6 rules 4y ago

0-200 km/h: 9.5 s

http://www.autobild.de/artikel/ferrari-enzo-ferrari-43731.html

BTW, do somebody has the Autobild test which did 0-160 in 6.4 s?

Thiago_Lins 5y ago

@Bernardo

Enzo Ferrari Road Test

0-60 mph 3.3"

0-100 mph 6.6"

1/4-Mile 11.1" @ 133 mph

Thiago_Lins 7y ago

REMEMBER:

QUATTRORUOTE (07/2005)

0-50 kph_1.85 sec.

0-100 kph_3.68 sec.

0-120 kph_5.03 sec

0-160 kph_7.21 sec.

0-180 kph_9.07 sec.

0-200 kph_10.74 sec.

0-240 kph_15.93 sec.

0-250 kph_17.48 sec.

0-280 kph_23.32 sec.

0-400 m._11.54 sec. @ 209.1 kph

0-1000 m._20.55 sec. @ 266.8 kph

Thiago_Lins 7y ago

REMEMBER:

CAR AND DRIVER (07/2003)

0-40 mph_2.0 sec.

0-60 mph_3.3 sec.

0-80 mph_5.0 sec.

0-100 mph_6.6 sec.

0-120 mph_9.2 sec.

0-130 mph_10.3 sec.

Standing 1/4-Mile_11.2 sec. @ 136 mph

Fangio Man 9y ago

*"3,14 seconds is the quickest recorded 0-100kph"*

Would be pretty amazing. 8O

Do you have a source?