Hey come comoon yes they are bought s-car,very very far from sport cars. My opinion it is they are all s-cars and i just think very many think like me,one think my Camry or worse and say Y they all are SUPERCARS.
Ferrari F8 Tributo specs
|Price in Europe||€232,694 - €315,770|
|Curb weight||1435 kg (3164 lbs)|
|Gas mileage||15.7 l/100 km (15 mpg US / 18 mpg UK)|
|0 - 40 kph||1.2 s|
|0 - 60 kph||1.7 s|
|0 - 80 kph||2.3 s|
|0 - 100 kph||2.9 s|
|0 - 120 kph||3.6 s|
|0 - 130 kph||4.0 s|
|0 - 150 kph||4.8 s|
|0 - 160 kph||5.3 s|
|0 - 180 kph||6.4 s|
|0 - 200 kph||7.7 s|
|0 - 220 kph||9.2 s|
|0 - 240 kph||10.9 s|
|0 - 260 kph||13.0 s|
|0 - 280 kph||16.1 s|
|0 - 300 kph||19.9 s|
|1000 m||18.3 s @ 292.2 kph|
|0 - 60 mph||2.8 s|
|1/4 mile||10.2 s|
|Top speed||340 kph (211 mph)|
|Engine type||twin turbo V8|
|Displacement||3.9 l (238 ci)|
|Power||720 ps (710 bhp / 530 kw)|
|Torque||770 Nm (568 lb-ft)|
|Power / liter||185 ps (182 hp)|
|Power / weight||502 ps (495 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||537 Nm (396 lb-ft) / t|
|Efficiency||46 PS per l/100 km|
|Power / €5000||14 ps|
|Transmission||7 speed dual clutch automatic|
|Layout||middle engine, rear wheel drive|
F8 Tributo competition
More Ferrari cars 142
Kimmo Moberg 1w ago
JuanAntonio 1w ago
Evenly matched with the 488 Pista
10.29 139.25 mph vs 10.30 141.27 mph
Wonder which one will get to 300 first
AhmadGalal 2w ago
I would say that in a real drag race, the 488 Pista beats F8 Tributo until 320 or 330 kmh, then the F8 starts to catch up
FastestLaps 2m ago
Sport Auto France had a comparison of this vs the new Porsche 911 Turbo S. Only the Porsche was allowed to be tested for performance figures. Oh what a surprise, what a shocker! :D
Nevertheless, the F8 won the comparison.
Tommi95 2m ago
New laptime at Vairano (1.10.453) and new acceleration figures from Quattroruote.
The tyres are cup2.
I posted the pictures of Quattroruote in the Facebook page of fastestlaps, in the comment under the post concerning the f8 Tributo:
dante 2m ago
when a german that's used to a polo test drives a ferrari for the first time :)
eng subtitles on youtube
Freakz 5m ago
F8 Tributo vs 800 HP AMG GTS rolling race:
aaayy 11m ago
Apparently Maranello wants to take away your steering wheel and replace it with with joysticks like a gaming system. It'll use backwards, forwards, and sideways movements to control the car. Sounds pretty cool, but I'm wondering what happens when your battery dies and you're coming into a corner at high speed...
Cocobe 1y ago
Out of the 488/458/F8 I think this one looks the best
Turbo S 1y ago
Don't think it will give 720S a run for it's money
Tommi95 2m ago
It will. On Quattroruote the laptimes were basically the same (1.10.2s vs 1.10.4s)and the acceleration figures were pretty close (7.7s to 0-200 kph, and 0-300 kph in 19.9s, the MC did 7.1 and 18.6s). If you consider that the Mc weighted 80 kg less and makes nearly 800 hp in reality, the Ferrari did really well. Besides, Quattroruote always tests the comfort of the suspensions and the noise levels for each car, and it appears that the f8 is much more comfortable than the Mclaren, which means Ferrari didn't have to compromise the ride quality to achieve those performances. The f8 is also cheaper and it keeps its value better. It's definitely a tough competitor.
Xbow1 2w ago @Tommi95
I don't know man. Those figures don't seem very close. There is a 0.6 second difference between the 0-200 times. That's not negligible. And is the F8 really better in comfort? Because the 720S has interconnected fluid dampers that gave past McLarens such smooth ride quality.
tommi95 1w ago @Xbow1
Well, the Mclaren has an edge in acceleration, but the Ferrari is the closest rival. The Lamborghini Huracan Performante does the 0-200 in 8.5s, the Huracan Evo in 9s and the 0-300 in like 27/28s. The Turbo S does the 0-200 in 8.5s and the 0-300 in 26s, the Avendator SVJ does the 0-200 in 8.5s and the 0-300 in 24s, the GT2RS does the 0-200 in 8.2s and the 0-300 in 22s. I mean, the Ferrari smokes all these cars in acceleration and at the end of the day 0.6s in the 0-200 and 1.3s in the 0-300 is a small difference. The 720s has a slight edge. If you consider that the 720s has 800 hp in reality and it weights 80 kg less, the fact that the Ferrari keeps up is remarkable. Overall the f8 is a bit faster than the 675 lt and a little less fast than the 720s, in straight line acceleration. Not only that, but the Ferrari has 0 turbo lag, so in a roll race it might even come on top, especially in 7th gear (the Mclaren has a really long 7th gear). The laptimes so far are also really really close. As for the ride quality, I'd post the pics here, but the system makes it impossible. However I assure you that despite all the tech, the Mclaren was stiffer and noisier than the Ferrari, according to the measurements. It also costs more, and depreciates more. And one more thing: the best lap of the f8 was achieved with the ESP on, which means that the electronics is perfectly tuned. Long story short: the Ferrari seems to be easier to drive on a track. It seems like a good match to me.
dante 1w ago @tommi95
most of the vw-911 times are bogus, especially over 200 km/h when compared to a lambo that pulls very hard like a shinkansen at top end :)
oliver 06 1y ago
812 is an elephant and can't be faster than 488 pista !
oliver 06 1y ago
i think lap time of fiorano ,are not logical and probably fact . its commercial from ferrari
Tupadre 2y ago
Beatifull and powerfull. I dont care the 720s
meatbag 2y ago
YAWN Wake me up when shitrrari comes up with something new.
dr. cosimo 2y ago
can't wait for the haters to chime and pull out all sorts abracadabras out of their rear end :)
Thiago_Lins 2y ago