Ferrari GTC4Lusso specs

Could you add 7 speed dual clutch automatic to transmission
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15100283/2017-ferrari-gtc4lusso-first-drive-review/

Curb weight 4480 lbs

Motortrend Ferrari GTC4Lusso First Drive Review
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ferrari/gtc4lusso/2017/2017-ferrari-gtc4lusso-first-drive-review-shooting-brake/

http://www.beverlyhills.ferraridealers.com/en_us/cars/ferrari-gtc4-lusso/technical-specifications
displacement is 6262 cc.

Displacement is 6,3 liters not 6.

ferrari gtc4lusso acceleration 100-250kph

If there ever tested seriously...

But I'd still take the V12, There getting rare today, I've always like the FF both in and out, But it's just too damned long, Shorten it by 18 inches n it would look so much better.

smaller engine, RWD only, and only 50kg less weight...

I reckon this could be actually faster than the bigger brother though around the track.

The GTC4Lusso T has been released.
http://www.motoroids.com/news/the-new-ferrari-gtc4lusso-t-is-the-first-four-seater-in-prancing-horse-history-with-a-v8-turbo/

GTC4Lusso T's performance figures:
power: 610PS @ 7500 rpm
torque: 760Nm @ 3000 - 5200 rpm
dry weight: 1740 kg
topspeed: 320 kph
0-100kph: 3.5 sec

ferrari official data:

top speed: 335 kph
0-100kph: 3.4 sec
0-200kph: 10.5 sec
100-0kph: 34 m
200-0kph: 138 m
curb weight: 1920 kg
dry weight: 1790 kg

http://www.beverlyhills.ferraridealers.com/en_us/cars/ferrari-gtc4-lusso/technical-specifications

Thats juat a typing mistake,anyone with common sense will understand that he means metres.

If a Ferrari needed 34 seconds to stop from 100kph. I would be seriously worried

Ferrari official data:

0-100 kph: 3.4 sec.
0-200 kph: 10.5 sec.
100-0 kph: 34 sec.
200-0 kph: 138 sec.

http://gtc4lusso.ferrari.com/de/technical-specifications/

top speed: 335 kph
0-100 kph: 3.4
0-200 kph: 10.5

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/03/02/ferrari-gtc4-lusso-geneva-2016/

does this still have the needlessly complex AWD?

Curb weight is 1920 kg. 1790 kg is the dry weight listed by ferrari.
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/03/02/ferrari-gtc4-lusso-geneva-2016/

And for nerds:

...I pull up in a Civic...

it's mainly a party for the ultra rich or KOLs (who are also rich). I hope I will be invited to a party like that in the future... xD

SO....Where the hell do i add laptimes now?...This new format is certainly not user friendly, I liked the ole one where a laptime was listed it would be shown on the side, That should be added back, Same with being able to add something on the car page.

...I think in order to be a hot hatch you have to be..You know, Affordable. COuld be wrong not too sure, But i dont think this is a hatch back, I think its called something else, Notchback maybe?

Why not? It is Hot and it is a hatchback is it not? :D

I dont think i would consider it a hot hatch.....

Its a pity that this car has tremendous weight. But it is not a supersport car its a supercar.

Well it looks long compared to other hot hatches because other hot hatches don't have a 680hp 6.3L V12. =］

Looks great, It shows a new styling department from upcoming vehicles, Specially the back.

I still think its way too long though, Makes it look weird. And i kinda like how there given cars an "Older" type of name like back in the day, Theres no huge power bump which i think is great, Instead they upgraded everything else.

And wtf? Why the hell didnt they call it the Ferrari FF GT4C Lusso?...

Still more then i expected, The interior looks great, But im quite skeptical about the screens...But id certainly take it over a 488.

I like the styling of this car, both the exterior and the interior is a step up from the FF in my opinion.

It has reduced power probably because it would spank F12 if it didn't :D

This car looks amazing. From the other side only 30 hp more than FF is a poor number . It should have engine from F12. 740 HP would be fine for that car.

Anyway i like this car. It will be an awesome machine. What a car !