Image of Ferrari LaFerrari

Ferrari LaFerrari specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1583-1585 kg (3490-3494 lbs)
Dimensions 4.70 m (185 in) long, 1.99 m (78 in) wide, 1.12 m (44 in) high
Wheelbase 2.65 m (104 in)
Introduced 2014
Origin country Italy
Views 205.7k
Submitted by Chiesi

Performance

Est. 0 - 40 kph1.3 s
0 - 50 kph1.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 kph1.8 s
Est. 0 - 70 kph2.1 s
0 - 80 kph1.9 s
Est. 0 - 90 kph2.8 s
0 - 100 kph2.7 s
Est. 0 - 110 kph3.4 s
Est. 0 - 120 kph3.7 s
Est. 0 - 130 kph4.1 s
Est. 0 - 140 kph4.5 s
Est. 0 - 150 kph4.8 s
Est. 0 - 160 kph5.2 s
Est. 0 - 170 kph5.6 s
Est. 0 - 180 kph6.1 s
Est. 0 - 190 kph6.5 s
0 - 200 kph6.9 s
Est. 0 - 210 kph7.7 s
Est. 0 - 220 kph8.3 s
Est. 0 - 230 kph9.0 s
Est. 0 - 240 kph9.7 s
Est. 0 - 250 kph10.5 s
Est. 0 - 260 kph11.6 s
Est. 0 - 270 kph12.6 s
Est. 0 - 280 kph14.0 s
Est. 0 - 290 kph15.1 s
0 - 300 kph15.0 s
Est. 100 m4.8 s @ 150.0 kph
Est. 1000 m18.2 s @ 312.0 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph1.7 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph4.0 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph8.8 s
Est. 0 - 30 mph1.5 s
0 - 40 mph1.5 s
Est. 0 - 50 mph2.5 s
0 - 60 mph2.4 s
0 - 70 mph2.9 s
0 - 80 mph3.4 s
0 - 90 mph4.0 s
0 - 100 mph4.7 s
0 - 110 mph5.5 s
0 - 120 mph6.4 s
0 - 130 mph7.4 s
0 - 140 mph8.5 s
Est. 0 - 150 mph9.8 s
Est. 0 - 160 mph11.2 s
Est. 0 - 170 mph13.3 s
Est. 0 - 180 mph14.3 s
Est. 0 - 200 mph19.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile6.8 s @ 122.4 mph
1/4 mile9.7 s @ 149.1 mph
Est. 1/2 mile15.5 s @ 185.8 mph
Top speed351 kph (218 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 08.8 s @ 627 ft
Est. max acceleration1.02 g (10 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration1.16 g (11 m/s²)
Ferrari LaFerrari acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V12
Displacement 6.3 l (384 ci)
Power 963 ps (950 bhp / 708 kw) @ 9250 rpm
Torque 900 Nm (664 lb-ft) @ 6750 rpm
Power / liter 153 ps (151 hp)
Power / weight 608 ps (600 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 568 Nm (419 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 7-speed DCT
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Braking distance

Est. 60 kph - 012 m (38 ft)
Est. 100 kph - 030 m (98 ft)
Est. 120 kph - 041 m (135 ft)
Est. 130 kph - 048 m (158 ft)
Est. 140 kph - 055 m (181 ft)
Est. 160 kph - 072 m (235 ft)
Est. 180 kph - 088 m (289 ft)
Est. 190 kph - 097 m (318 ft)
Est. 200 kph - 0106 m (348 ft)
Est. 300 kph - 0230 m (753 ft)
Est. 30 mph - 08 m (25 ft)
Est. 50 mph - 020 m (65 ft)
60 mph - 029 m (95 ft)
70 mph - 041 m (136 ft)
User avatar
User avatar

Robert  4d ago

there's no way laferrari does 0-300 in 15s

 

User avatar

JuanAntonio  3d ago

Ok.


User avatar

dante  3m ago

some people live just to own a ferrari or lambo :)

 

 

User avatar

Cocobe  3m ago

Not all lamborghinis or Ferrari’s are the same. It’s not really hard to own a Ferrari or lambo. To own a nice one is another thing.


User avatar

dante  3m ago @Cocobe

only a blind fool / dreamer would choose a lexsux over the other 2 :)


User avatar

Cocobe  3d ago @dante

explains why so many bankrupt celebrities/ballers/lottery winners have once bought Ferrari's and Lamborghinis.

Nobody dreams of buying a lexus.


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @dante

Actually, a dreamer would choose a Ferrari, since they are so expensive.


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Cocobe

'Nobody dreams of buying a lexus.'

because it's not a supercar you'd want to own or dream of in the first place, cause of the alien design lololololol

458f92554f10.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @dante

Hey wait a minute not all Lexus look strange. Look at the LC500, that car is beautiful.


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Xbow1

looks like an unfinished concept and too dull for a 100k car

5179a48caf1d.jpg?550x800m

sublime

02a0f5b21e38.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @dante

I disagree with you. It looks exotic in an elegant way, without appearing outlandish like the RC F. It is a complex design that somehow works incredibly well. And the interior is top notch.


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Xbow1

it's too ugly for a 100k car, 45k would be a fair price with an unfinished design and 5 extra useless gears :)

https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2018/09/you-thought-toyotas-lexus-lc-sales-expectations-were-inconceivable-and-you-were-right/


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @dante

Its not ugly at all, that's just your opinion. I'm sure most petrolheads agree with me in saying that it is beautiful. And while yes it is more expensive than it should be, luxury/sport coupes are usually overpriced. The LC is probably more like 75-85k, but it is definitely an excellent car regardless.


User avatar

FastestLaps  3d ago @Cocobe

explains why so many bankrupt celebrities/ballers/lottery winners have once bought Ferrari's and Lamborghinis

What about talentless, aging and increasingly irrelevant paparazzi queens?

Nobody dreams of buying a lexus

lf-a-paris.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

FastestLaps  3d ago @dante

o-rly.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Xbow1

heavier, bulkier and the admin goes fap fap fap all over it :)



User avatar

dante  3d ago @FastestLaps

'What about talentless, aging and increasingly irrelevant paparazzi queens?'

he's been disconnected from the real world for some time now, since the george ***** scheme went viral on 5/2020.

1a9803b4ae27.jpg?550x800m

cd21b5148789.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Cocobe  3d ago @dante

The LC500 is like one of the few cars that actually looks like a concept car. You say it's heavy... how heavy was a SL55 a decade ago? how heavy is a S63 coupe right now?

If you don't like it that's good. Just means the design isn't dull. It's supposed to be polarizing. Honestly, if I wanted a car that sounded awesome but didn't break, and was super comfy, and a great interior, I'd pick this over an S63 or an E63 coupe. When all cars become electric, this will become a classic.



User avatar

dante  3d ago @Cocobe

a classic and a lexsux ? since when ? lol

this so called classic of yours looks like a camry now lol

cc963651ca0a.jpg?550x800m

this is a real beauty after 30 years

a8160096290e.jpg?550x800m

not comparable in anyway, lexsux is for the poor and broke ass loser, a rebadged toyoyoyoyota end of story.

there's no e63 coupe, where the hell did you come up with that ? are you back into snorting meth again ?


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @Cocobe

Well you probably can't compare the S-Coupe to the LC500. They're in different categories. and are both awesome cars. As for the E-Coupe, I don't think it exists.


User avatar

Cocobe  3d ago @dante

stop being a smart a$$. There was an E coupe for many years and it still exists. Just not a facelifted brand new E63. So they only have the E53 coupe now, which is worst since it doesn't even have a V8. I wouldn't care because I wouldn't ever buy an E63 coupe even if there was one. I'd get the estate.

So you didn't answer my question. You said the LC500 was heavy. How heavy is an S63 coupe then? How much is the E53 coupe then? The E53 coupe is heavier than the LC500. Doesn't have a v8 and is still heavier. So much for criticising the lexus for being heavy. Its not a hardcore sports car.

Rebadged Toyota? I didn't know Toyota have an equivalent LC500... you logic is amazing. A Bentley is a rebadged VW. A Lamborghini is a rebadged VW. A Rolls Royce is a rebadged BMW then.


User avatar

Cocobe  3d ago @Xbow1

The E coupe does exist... I see them all the time lol.
about the S coupe ever being compared to the LC500...
https://www.carscoops.com/2018/06/bmw-8-series-vs-mercedes-s-class-vs-lexus-lc-time-compare-big-boys/

and oh wait, the poll at the bottom, people said they want the LC500 over the M8 and the S coupe... who cares if cosimo don't like lol


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @Cocobe

I think it would be more apt to compare the LC500 to an M4. True, the M4 defeats in in performance, since it is after all a sport coupe, but the LC500 is a much better balanced vehicle.


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @Cocobe

Well the LC is one desirable machine! Though the S is also incredible(still a category above the LC) and the M8 seems to be a performance coupe, not a luxury coupe.


User avatar

Cocobe  3d ago @Xbow1

if you compare the interiors and stiffness of the suspension, the M4 was certainly to be a hardcore sports car, and the LC500 was meant for grand touring in a luxury environment.
The C63 has a very rough ride, while the S63 has a magic carpet ride. The LC500 is more closer to the S63 in that aspect, and the interior quality too.


User avatar

Xbow1  3d ago @Cocobe

Fair point. How about the C43 Coupe? I realise its much cheaper but it has similar performance to the LC, though probably not as special.


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Cocobe

you said e63 coupe, show me an example of this version and not an e coupe then you switch to e53. we both know you're one stupid troll that's good with twisting words. go vote for hamilton on 11/3 lol

you're comparing a shitty two door lexsux to a high end merc and not any merc but an s-coupe ? you must be way too stupid to even go that far, the interior of the merc costs more than the lc fully loaded lolololol

btw, the s63 has a powerful engine with enough torque that it would take lexsux another 30 years to get there, 900nm. you also get a 4matic version that makes it more of a 24/7 that no lexsux will ever come close to, maybe stick with rav4 and rx fake awd system ? lolololol

'Rebadged Toyota? I didn't know Toyota have an equivalent LC500'

no no no no no no no, never ever compare a pos toyoyoyoyo to eu cars, never, you hear me meth-head :)

toyoyoyo is based on parts bin from outgoing models from 10 - 20 years with a mild upgrade. the lc platform is based on the flagship failure the ls lol

2021 rcf gets a blind spot monitoring and android/apple car play hahahahahaha, this is what toyoyoyoyo can offer, instead of pushing for more power and torque which is costly for a shit company that made its fortune from rollas and milf suvs. oh and another fake limited special 60 examples will be out soon to squeeze more dollars out of their loyal dumbass fans. lol


User avatar

dante  3d ago @Cocobe

'and oh wait, the poll at the bottom, people said they want the LC500 over the M8 and the S coupe... who cares if cosimo don't like lol'

you mean the same people that comment on youtube and claim their daddy owns a,b,c......cars. good for you lol


User avatar

FastestLaps  3d ago @Cocobe

Paris needs to fire her financial adviser. LFA is future million dollar collectible. I understand that prices are insane for these sort of cars lately, but LFA is the kind of car that you could sit out any market crash/correction and quickly be back to bubble prices after economy recovers. Long term investment in other words.


User avatar

SpeedKing  3d ago @FastestLaps

Not unlike Tesla stocks urgh


User avatar

Cocobe  2d ago @SpeedKing

You should check out Nio shares. Can’t believe I sold it all at $4 last year when it jumped 100% in one day.

The volatility and the unlikelihood of the company surviving was too much for my sleep


User avatar

SpeedKing  2d ago @Cocobe

Musk has an uncanny ability to suck peeps in. I don't know why the share price is totally inflated but i think it's obscene and idiotic whatever the reason...


User avatar

FastestLaps  2d ago @SpeedKing

Call me Mr Cynical but didn't the obscure nothing-company Nikola go from zero to 20 billion dollar "valuation" just because the name "Nikola" rymes with "Tesla".

Yes, we have gone that far.


User avatar

SpeedKing  2d ago @FastestLaps

The only thing i know for certain is that the world has gone totally mad and stock prices are a farce.


User avatar

dante  2d ago @FastestLaps

'but LFA is the kind of car that you could sit out any market crash/correction and quickly be back to bubble prices after economy recovers'

he disagrees with you

 


User avatar

Freakz  6m ago

LaFerrari 372 km/h:

 


User avatar

Benedict  1y ago

 


User avatar

Vasile  1y ago

Time at spa francorchamps identical with megane trophy-r 2019


User avatar

saxy  3y ago

Probably cuz we are spoiled by insanely fast F1 cars of late. That FXXK evolution looks pedestrian slow. Sounds good tho


User avatar

Freakz  3y ago

2018 Ferrari FXX K Evoluzione Mule Testing:

 


User avatar

Freakz  3y ago

FXXK vs P1 GTR:

 


User avatar

Freakz  3y ago

LaFerrari 359 km/h:

 


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

Laferrari did 1/4 mile in 9,9s ! Great result.


User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

Its a monster!!


User avatar

Freakz  4y ago

LaFerrari vs 458 Speciale 1/4 mile drag!

 


User avatar

Freakz  4y ago

LaFerrari vs Ford Fiesta... cause why not?!

 

 

User avatar

Fastedee  4y ago

Lolool. So I'm guessing the Ferrari caught it lmao


User avatar

Freakz  4y ago @Fastedee

It did! xD
This was actually the fastest LaFerrari managed (10.4 sec) since it was all wet the LaFerrari owner Bailey didn't launch the car hard.


User avatar

scacia  1m ago @Freakz

Its not the fastest haha your a joke 9.7 is the fastest


User avatar

Freakz  1m ago @scacia

10.4 was the fastest it managed on that wet day!


User avatar

JuanAntonio  3d ago @scacia

No, it's 9.9 sec. And he means that in that wet day, it was 10.4.


User avatar

QA51M  4y ago

how can anyone say the laferrari is faster than 918 and p1 when all performance tests say otherwise


User avatar

AlexLaFF  4y ago

still the Laferrari could beat the P1 and 918 anyday


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  4y ago

Torque is 900 Nm. 700 Nm is only the petrol engine's torque, the whole "system" has 900 Nm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaFerrari#Specifications


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

A million dollar AWD car with no racing or building pedigree beats an expensive supercar at a drag race. That really means nothing. For 1, it's not like it was a 100k car beat a million dollar ferrari. For 2, it's a 2-ton heavy car with batteries. It's a one-trick pony. If all a supercar was to do is to win a drag races, well i'm sorry then should everybody go buy dragsters?

I honestly don't think the "electric supercar" market will ever thrive. You buy a supercar because you want to be unsensible. You don't want a economic, practical thing on 4 wheels that gets you from A to B. Now especially when practical Teslas are doing 0-60mph in 2.65s, the argument of getting an electric supercar because of fast acceleration isn't valid anymore.


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

Excuses or facts ? These are facts that Rimac is more powerfull and has AWD system so noONE should be hurt that it is a faster car than LF.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

.....If you didnt....Then ehy did you list those excuses in your previous comments?......

So Laferrari lost in short distance drag race against 1100 hp AWD- 1mln $ monster that has instant torque and who cares ?

Butthurt mode (Off) ([on])

lol Come on


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

No its not. Butthurt syndrome is possible when i see that Mp4-12c is faster than 488 but i totally dont care that Rimac is quicker than LF in drag race.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

....That almost sounds like butthurt syndrome...


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

And your point is ? So Laferrari lost in short distance drag race against 1100 hp AWD- 1mln $ monster that has instant torque and who cares ? Laferrari has extreme straight line acceleration level but also it sounds and handles absolutely incredible.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

That, Is why people shouldnt test cars like this.


User avatar

Freakz  4y ago

Rimac Concept One vs LaFerrari vs Tesla P90D

 


User avatar

saxy  5y ago

Not feeling it. The Speciale Aperta was jaw dropping. This one reminds me of the aventador roadster. The ratio of how big the open top area is vs the size of car just doesn't match up. Actually I take that back. The aventador roadster looks a lot better



User avatar

Freakz  5y ago

TUG OF WAR! O_O
LaFerrari vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

 


User avatar

fakekillerfour  5y ago

Car and Driver weighed the Laferrari at 3489 Ibs 1583 kg.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/ferrari-laferrari-hypercar-tested-review


User avatar

E63AMG  5y ago

Crazy swiss Lafefe

 


User avatar

Freakz  5y ago

Have been thinking how this LaFerrari owned by Matt has very good acceleration (while on damp conditions and 2 people on board): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZROYOq8Y3w