Ford GT (Mk II 656 PS) specs
| Price in Europe | €530,000 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1385-1533 kg (3053-3380 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.76 m (187 in) long, 2.00 m (79 in) wide, 1.11 m (44 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.71 m (107 in) |
| Introduced | 2017 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Views | 71.5k |
| Submitted by | BR2+ |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.3 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 3.7 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 4.4 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 5.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 6.2 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 8.6 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 10.1 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 11.9 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 14.5 s |
| 0 - 160 mph | 17.5 s |
| 0 - 170 mph | 21.4 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 7.7 s @ 109.4 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 10.8 s @ 134.0 mph |
| 1/2 mile | 17.2 s |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 60 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.3 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 5.2 s |
| 0 - 150 kph | 5.8 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 6.2 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 7.9 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 9.8 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 11.8 s |
| 0 - 240 kph | 14.5 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 16.0 s |
| 0 - 260 kph | 18.1 s |
| 1000 m | 19.8 s @ 268.7 kph |
| 100 - 140 kph | 1.9 s |
| 100 - 200 kph | 6.1 s |
| 45 - 65 mph | 1.2 s |
General performance
| Top speed | 348 kph (216 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 9.9 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.86 g (8 m/s²) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.11 g (11 m/s²) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 29 m (95 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 44 m (145 ft) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | TwinTurbo EcoBoost V6 |
| Displacement | 3.5 l (214 ci) |
| Power | 656 ps (647 bhp / 482 kw) @ 6250 rpm |
| Torque | 746 Nm (550 lb-ft) @ 5900 rpm |
| Power / liter | 187 ps (185 hp) |
| Power / weight | 443 ps (437 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 504 Nm (372 lb-ft) / t |
| Power / €5000 | 6 ps |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT |
| Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
GT competition
exhaustingexhst 2w ago
gt 5m ago
Ford gt started as a lmgt3 racecar then it was converted into a road legal car the label is supercar.
Manufactures use gt term to describe a full size sports car body thats good for FIA racing if the car has more hp than lmgt3 it automatically classifies as a supercar. Journalism laziness and exotism/price has nothing to do with it. Puting certain cars on a pedestal for income and importance reasons ok.
spheric 5m ago
The powertrain isn't the issue, the only issue with this model is the HP output, with 700hp-720hp this could been much more capable and not get done out by 991 GT2RS, SVJ,720s or even the base model 488GTB?Other than that good model holds value well too and IRL looks insane.
2026 seems to be the year for atleast the concept successor of this model comes out , or atleast theres speculation about a New high performance Ford coming
https://fordauthority.com/2025/11/ford-gt-successor-could-be-ford-racings-big-january-reveal/
wallenieswiftie 1y ago
The Mach-E wasn't when I realized Ford didn't care about its customers. It was actually this EcoBoost 3.5 GT. It is a fantastic handling car, but a terrible performance car for the value. Although rare, a 60-degree V8 should have been built based off that V6 in order to keep it built-in for the GT's platform. Cars with 60-degree V8 engines are usually compatible with 90-degree V6s. The 60* V8 is like a reverse 90* V6...longer, but narrower.
I would advise against another 90-degree V8 GT though as that block has been a bit too much affiliated with the Mustang and F-Series models, unless they could somehow turn it into a 180-degree variant (like they did with the Voodoo!).
McLarenFanboy 1y ago
This car is really good looking, I just wish the acceleration figures were better because they're honestly beyond pathetic for a car of this caliber. Track performance is good for the specs, you can't expect this to get near a GT2 RS or a Pista if you don't even give it Cup 2 R to begin with. So considering the car is on base Cup 2s laptimes are fairly decent
Aaron 3y ago
I don't think people understand how freaking insane this thing looks in person. Literally only a few cars come even remotely close. A Koenigsegg One:1? Ferrari SP3 Daytona? Pagani Huayra R? And I think that's it. This will be a very hot take but even the P1 and LaFerrari aren't that visually appealing compared with the GT. The Ford GT beats literally everything in it's price range when it comes to looks.
wallenieswiftie 3y ago
I hate to be the one to say this, but I do not believe that the second generation GT will appreciate in value in the same way that the first generation one did.
The first model was a supercharged V8 competing successfully against most hypercars of its day. Basically the Ferrari SF90 Stradale and Chevy Corvette E-Ray of its day combined.
The second model was matched or beaten by cars costing between 1/5 and 3/5 of its MSRP even though it had a twin-turbo V6.
TypeF173 4y ago
Motortrend, Ford GT "spanks" Lamborghini Aventador SVJ and THEN it tries it on with the Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport in a decider race showoff!
Except NO Bugatti race! They'd BETTER bloody time it AND SHOW IT!🤦
TypeF173 4y ago
Ford GT HOTLAPS at Laguna Seca PLUS apparently the McLaren Senna AND 765LT!🔥
🧐
hostboy 4y ago
Unlike the GT, its indirect successor will be a series-production super-GT
https://carbuzz.com/news/the-ford-thunderbird-may-return-as-a-corvette-fighting-sportscar
TypeF173 4y ago
A special announcement from John Hennessey, quote>"HPE DOES NOT PLAN TO OFFER ANY PERFORMANCE UPGRADES FOR THE NEW FORD GT AT THIS TIME. IT DOES NOT HAPPEN OFTEN BUT SOME CARS ARE NOT MEANT TO BE MODIFIED. IN OUR HUMBLE OPINION, THE NEW FORD GT IS ONE OF THESE CARS."
Hennessey website.
🤔
John it's the one bloody car that DID NEED some electronic "enhancements?"
😂
hostboy 4y ago
The Ford GT's acceleration is the exact reason why engine inertia is important. If this car had produced the same power and even the same torque out of a larger engine — say, a 5.0-liter V-8 — that peak torque would start very early in the range. The problem with the EcoBoost engine is that it can't handle that much power and torque without a huge turbocharger, and that's what decreases the engine inertia and makes the car unstable. There is no replacement for displacement even when it comes to supercharging and turbocharging.
The previous Ford GT had a 5.4L supercharged V-8 and that car is not only already equally as fast as this one, but it makes more than the advertised 550 hp (only underrated so that it wouldn't officially touch the established Hypercar Big 3 of the time — CGT, McF1, and Enzo).
Disclosure: Drag coefficient, frontal area, and curb weight figures are estimates of my own; not copied from manufacturers or independent tests.
2005 Ford GT
Drag coefficient: 0.338 Cd
Frontal area: 19.40 sq. ft. (x1.2 for mirrors and ground clearance)
Curb weight: 3492 lb (+165 lb for driver)
Top speed: 211.89 mph (verified @Nardo)
= 545 rwhp (rounded up)
2017 Ford GT
Drag coefficient: 0.310 Cd
Frontal area: 19.63 sq. ft. (x1.2 for mirrors and ground clearance)
Curb weight: 3313 lb (+165 lb for driver)
Top speed: 213.xx mph (verified @JBPG; rounded up to 214 mph regardless)
= 520 rwhp (rounded up)
Thiago_Lins 4y ago
Ford GT - Lap Velocitta - 0'57"507
Corvolet3 5y ago
Ford GT: is a track oriented supercar for 500k to up to a million
Also Ford GT: is outmatched by a Ferrari on most tracks for half the price ;)

Just buy an MC20 if you want a fast and actually pretty V6 supercar
TypeF173 5y ago
So the finest manufacturers in terms production portfolio from hatchbacks to hypercars are FORD and MERCEDES-BENZ. Leave your thoughts below>
































