Is the Roman numeral correct for generation number? Is it Mk 4 or Mk 6? Here is says Mk 6: https://fastestlaps.com/models/ford-mustang-gt-mk-vi-facelift
Update: pretty sure it was just typo for EU version. It has to be gen 6.
Ford Mustang GT (Mk VI Euro-Spec) specs
| Price in Europe | €44,000 - €62,300 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1748-1831 kg (3854-4037 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.78 m (188 in) long, 1.92 m (75 in) wide, 1.38 m (54 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.72 m (107 in) |
| Years built | 2018 - 2024 |
| Origin country | United States |
| Gas mileage | 28.0-5.8 l/100 km (8-41 mpg US / 10-49 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 302 g/km |
| Views | 969 |
| Submitted by | jeremyclarkson1 |
Lap times
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 70 kph | 3.3 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.8 s |
| 0 - 90 kph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 110 kph | 5.7 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.4 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 7.1 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 150 kph | 8.9 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 170 kph | 11.0 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.1 s |
| 0 - 190 kph | 13.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 15.3 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 26.0 s |
| 1000 m | 23.1 s |
| 1/8 mile | 8.5 s |
| 1/4 mile | 12.7 s |
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| 18m slalom | 69.4 kph (43.1 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 134.0 kph (83.3 mph) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | 5.0 Litre V8 |
| Displacement | 5.0 l (302 ci / 4951 cc) |
| Power | 450 ps (444 bhp / 331 kw) @ 7000 rpm |
| Tested power | 454 ps (448 bhp) @ 6400 rpm |
| Torque | 527 Nm (389 lb-ft) @ 4600 rpm |
| Tested torque | 550 Nm (406 lbft) @ 4500 rpm |
| Power / liter | 91 ps (90 hp) |
| Power / weight | 254 ps (251 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 298 Nm (219 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 34 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 44 ps |
| Transmission | 10 Speed Automatic, 6 Speed Manual |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 50 kph - 0 | 9 m (29 ft) |
| 60 kph - 0 | 14 m (47 ft) |
| 80 kph - 0 | 25 m (83 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 33 m (110 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 57 m (187 ft) |
| 150 kph - 0 | 78 m (255 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 134 m (441 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.8 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 4.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 6.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 9.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (8) | 13.1 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 13.2 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 19.7 s |
| 100 - 140 kph | 2.9 s |
| 100 - 200 kph | 10.2 s |
Interior noise
| Noise @ idle | 44 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 63 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 68 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 67 dB |
| Noise @ 120 kph | 75 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 71 dB |
Mustang GT competition
jeremyclarkson1 1y ago
@FastestLaps it didnt let me add a main picture can you add one
FastestLaps 1y ago
If you have a pic:
I don't know what it looks like 🥴
jeremyclarkson1 1y ago @FastestLaps
could you still switch some of the laptimes and acceleration datas for the mustang mach 1 i @ you in?
Corvolet3 1y ago
They made the Mustang a bit too heavy compared to the 6th gen. Not to mention the EU version is probably slower than the predecessor as well. What a shame.
I have been in the EU Dark Horse before with like 3 hp more? And yes, the average car got easily gapped once you put the pedal to the metal, but considering the sports cars I've driven before it really wasn't much to write home about.
All things considered, a Camaro SS would probably be a better buy.
