Image of Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R

Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R (Mk IV) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1631 kg (3596 lbs)
Introduced 2000
Origin country United States
Views 24.9k

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph4.5 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph4.3 s
0 - 100 mph10.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.6 s @ 92.6 mph
1/4 mile12.6 s @ 113.1 mph
Top speed284 kph (176 mph)
Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 5.4 l (330 ci)
Power 385 ps (380 bhp / 283 kw)
Torque 522 Nm (385 lb-ft)
Power / liter 71 ps (70 hp)
Power / weight 236 ps (233 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 320 Nm (236 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar

User avatar

Flabernat  7y ago

@ milehisnk, not really. An e46M3 perhaps, but not an e92M3.
(just look at the Willow Springs laptimes...)


User avatar

milehisnk  7y ago

This car would absolutely eat alive the E92 M3, straight line and curves. That's what it was made to do


User avatar

Fangio Man  7y ago

The submitter forgot to capitalize the "R" after Cobra. :P



User avatar

Junk B  9y ago

@ S

Same here, it is a road legal car


User avatar

CarElitist  9y ago

Isn't this a non-street legal car?


User avatar

broom broom harvey  10y ago

this is the best mustang ever made I think


User avatar

Apathy  10y ago

GM didn't have anything that could beat it in 2000. When the C5Z came around (in 01), the corvette was clearly faster. The R's supremacy was short lived, like all quick cars.


User avatar

tyrant  10y ago

you really think GM had nothing that can beat this car http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/chevrolet_corvette_c5_z06_2001-vs-ford_mustang_svt_cobra_r.html


User avatar

Apathy308  10y ago

Also, this isn\'t the only mustang with an IRS. Educate yourself.


User avatar

Discerning308  10y ago

This car pulled over 1G in MY 2000 and ran quicker times around Waterford Hills than a C5Z, SRT10 Viper, and an E92 M3 and you people think it was no good? Wow... tough crowd.

Yes, corvettes were priced similarly (actually less), but you have to remember that GM had NOTHING that could touch this in 2000. All they had was the base C5, and that would get demolished by this. Even the C5Z could possibly barely beat it.


User avatar

444  11y ago

Fords are great cars and they found a way to make the live rear axle work while still making the Mustang affordable.


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

The one shot at an independent suspension, Ford is for losers.


User avatar

E  11y ago

I think the real issue is that Corvettes are $50,000+. I can't see why Corvette priced Mustangs exists when the Vette is typically superior in everyway. But those loyal to Ford have their reasons.


User avatar

BumRush  11y ago

You have to admit, $55,000 for this isnt bad at all! and great fun here. ill admit 55K for a Mustang is pretty high, but for its Exclusivity, and dashing looks, i wouldnt mind paying that much.


User avatar

monkeypop  11y ago

"Sooo, if had a 997 911 Carrera S PDK, would you still be so confident?"

Sure, because before you got away I would simply run you off the road LOL


User avatar

Anonymous  11y ago

Sooo, if had a 997 911 Carrera S PDK, would you still be so confident?


User avatar

DougSlater  11y ago

Anonymous on top is gay and wouldn't know cars even if one bit him on the arse. I'd put this up against whatever you drive anyday


User avatar

fordman  12y ago

just think how much faster than an M3 this would be if you added 13psi to the equation. oh ya **** imports.


User avatar

BumRush  12y ago

i am curious what more times this car could produce, but its so damned rare that there will prolly be damn near none, but it could prolly take the R26 on longer tracks, but tight twisty tracks...(maybe). doubt it could take the R26R though. straightline yes, round a track...hard to say! and it definetly wont take an E92 M# in a straightline or round a track, it will keep up with it, but not beat it.


User avatar

Anonymous  12y ago

this will eat a Megane R26, not an E92 M3 though.


User avatar

crni09  12y ago

this car is not faster the megane r26 you forget the m3


User avatar

Anonymous  12y ago

100km/h is 62mph


User avatar

Georg  12y ago

most likely 4.5s is a 0-60mph time not 0-100km/h time... 0-160km/h(100mph) the M3 is clearly faster by one second


User avatar

man KC  12y ago

4.5 sec to 100... geez... thats faster than a BMW M3. Must be underrated.


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

I sense a slight bias


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

Noone left a comment because its not worth talking about. ****in Garbage.


User avatar

Japan  13y ago

I love the looks of this car