
Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4 specs
| Price in Britain | £25,960 |
| Car type | 4-door saloon |
| Curb weight | 1240-1350 kg (2734-2976 lbs) |
| Introduced | 1990 |
| Origin country | United Kingdom |
| Gas mileage | 18.2-7.6 l/100 km (13-31 mpg US / 16-37 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 254 g/km |
| Views | 41.4k |
| Submitted by | Bezza |
Lap times
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Castle Combe (pre 1999) | 1:16.94 |
| Hockenheim Short | 1:23.00 |
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 6.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 10.5 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 13.1 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 15.7 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 10.4 s @ 80.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 14.3 s |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.3 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 8.9 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 11.8 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 15.7 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 20.1 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 28.6 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 40.2 s |
| 1000 m | 26.4 s |
General performance
| Top speed | 240 kph (149 mph) |
| 60 kph - 0 | 15 m (48 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 40 m (131 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 59 m (194 ft) |
| Noise @ idle | 48 dB |
| Noise @ 120 kph | 71 dB |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | 4 cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci) |
| Power | 223 ps (220 bhp / 164 kw) |
| Torque | 290 Nm (214 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 112 ps (110 hp) |
| Power / weight | 170 ps (168 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 221 Nm (163 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 17 PS per l/100 km |
| Transmission | 5 |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
Rolling acceleration
| 40 - 60 kph (3) | 3.5 s |
| 40 - 60 kph (4) | 5.6 s |
| 40 - 60 kph (5) | 7.2 s |
| 40 - 80 kph (3) | 5.6 s |
| 40 - 80 kph (4) | 9.5 s |
| 40 - 80 kph (5) | 13.5 s |
| 40 - 100 kph (3) | 7.4 s |
| 40 - 100 kph (4) | 11.7 s |
| 40 - 100 kph (5) | 16.7 s |
| 40 - 120 kph (3) | 10.2 s |
| 40 - 120 kph (4) | 15.3 s |
| 40 - 120 kph (5) | 21.7 s |
| 40 - 140 kph (3) | 13.1 s |
| 40 - 140 kph (4) | 18.9 s |
| 40 - 140 kph (5) | 26.3 s |
| 40 - 160 kph (4) | 22.4 s |
| 40 - 160 kph (5) | 31.2 s |
| 40 - 180 kph (4) | 27.0 s |
| 40 - 180 kph (5) | 36.6 s |
| 40 - 200 kph (4) | 34.1 s |
| 40 - 200 kph (5) | 44.3 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 7.4 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 11.5 s |
| 60 - 120 kph (4) | 11.6 s |
| 60 - 120 kph (5) | 15.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 5.9 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 8.1 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 7.3 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 21.8 s |
Sierra Cosworth 4x4 competition
Corvolet3 5y ago
Underrated classic
Crispi74 1y ago
https://ibb.co/zHWr5ZTt
https://ibb.co/Q7LzWq3T
https://ibb.co/R4dQH9dv
https://ibb.co/yJ0fQZ7
https://ibb.co/7x91fPPG
https://ibb.co/tVbRZQQ
https://ibb.co/ns60FGsb
https://ibb.co/zT7TCCgQ
5 italian tuners.
That's a valid example on how to evalute power delivery compared to the power peak.
Crispi74 1y ago @196ss
Ok I see.
I posted these scans because we found in past so many similar situations were the power delivery affect chrono more than how really the high top power do.
I suggest to try to translate the article.
It's interesting to read that the "Orlando" Sierra was the powerful car because they used +300 PS road power kit + harder cams profile and turbo but this doesn't affect acceleration like the "Vaccari" Sierra that produce better low power basically with just a 270 PS well ECU map tune.
This is just to say how Marelli IAW was functional using the ability of overboosting.
That example is very helpful imo.
196ss 1y ago @Crispi74
Thanks for the article, that's very interesting topic indeed.
Curiously, that Orlando, while accelerating from a standstill about as fast as BMC and Vaccari and having an even higher top speed, seems weaker when accelerating in gear. It would be very interesting to see the torque curves of these tuned engines. Won't be surprised if Orlando motor is tuned more for top end power than low end torque.
In general, from what I've seen, we have to be careful with hp numbers claimed by tuners. It often happens that a car with less claimed power goes faster. Probably it can be explained by different conditions and approaches to the power measurement.
















