Image of Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4

Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4 specs

Price in Britain £25,960
Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1240-1350 kg (2734-2976 lbs)
Introduced 1990
Origin country United Kingdom
Gas mileage 18.2-7.6 l/100 km (13-31 mpg US / 16-37 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 254 g/km
Views 41.4k
Submitted by Bezza

Lap times

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph2.0 s
0 - 40 mph3.4 s
0 - 50 mph4.7 s
0 - 60 mph6.2 s
0 - 70 mph8.4 s
0 - 80 mph10.5 s
0 - 90 mph13.1 s
0 - 100 mph15.7 s
Est. 1/8 mile10.4 s @ 80.8 mph
1/4 mile14.3 s

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.6 s
0 - 60 kph3.0 s
0 - 80 kph4.3 s
0 - 100 kph6.5 s
0 - 120 kph8.9 s
0 - 140 kph11.8 s
0 - 160 kph15.7 s
0 - 180 kph20.1 s
0 - 200 kph28.6 s
0 - 220 kph40.2 s
1000 m26.4 s
Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4 acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed240 kph (149 mph)
60 kph - 015 m (48 ft)
100 kph - 040 m (131 ft)
120 kph - 059 m (194 ft)
Noise @ idle48 dB
Noise @ 120 kph71 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type 4 cylinder
Displacement 2.0 l (122 ci)
Power 223 ps (220 bhp / 164 kw)
Torque 290 Nm (214 lb-ft)
Power / liter 112 ps (110 hp)
Power / weight 170 ps (168 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 221 Nm (163 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 17 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

40 - 60 kph (3)3.5 s
40 - 60 kph (4)5.6 s
40 - 60 kph (5)7.2 s
40 - 80 kph (3)5.6 s
40 - 80 kph (4)9.5 s
40 - 80 kph (5)13.5 s
40 - 100 kph (3)7.4 s
40 - 100 kph (4)11.7 s
40 - 100 kph (5)16.7 s
40 - 120 kph (3)10.2 s
40 - 120 kph (4)15.3 s
40 - 120 kph (5)21.7 s
40 - 140 kph (3)13.1 s
40 - 140 kph (4)18.9 s
40 - 140 kph (5)26.3 s
40 - 160 kph (4)22.4 s
40 - 160 kph (5)31.2 s
40 - 180 kph (4)27.0 s
40 - 180 kph (5)36.6 s
40 - 200 kph (4)34.1 s
40 - 200 kph (5)44.3 s
60 - 100 kph (4)7.4 s
60 - 100 kph (5)11.5 s
60 - 120 kph (4)11.6 s
60 - 120 kph (5)15.8 s
80 - 120 kph (4)5.9 s
80 - 120 kph (5)8.1 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph7.3 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph21.8 s

More Ford cars 177

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

GriN  2y ago

b6cc9dfe4ce2.jpg?550x800m

Reply +1
341  

User avatar

GriN  2y ago

17cf0612e747.jpg?550x800m

Reply +1
230  

User avatar

Corvolet3  5y ago

Underrated classic

Reply +3
689  

User avatar

Z31Turbo84  5y ago

I agree

Reply +2
672  


User avatar

196ss  1y ago @Crispi74

Now you can immediately attach pictures to your post by clicking the appropriate icon below the text.

Reply +2
108  

User avatar

Crispi74  1y ago @196ss

Ok I see.

I posted these scans because we found in past so many similar situations were the power delivery affect chrono more than how really the high top power do.
I suggest to try to translate the article.
It's interesting to read that the "Orlando" Sierra was the powerful car because they used +300 PS road power kit + harder cams profile and turbo but this doesn't affect acceleration like the "Vaccari" Sierra that produce better low power basically with just a 270 PS well ECU map tune.

This is just to say how Marelli IAW was functional using the ability of overboosting.
That example is very helpful imo.

Reply +1
97  

User avatar

196ss  1y ago @Crispi74

Thanks for the article, that's very interesting topic indeed.
Curiously, that Orlando, while accelerating from a standstill about as fast as BMC and Vaccari and having an even higher top speed, seems weaker when accelerating in gear. It would be very interesting to see the torque curves of these tuned engines. Won't be surprised if Orlando motor is tuned more for top end power than low end torque.
In general, from what I've seen, we have to be careful with hp numbers claimed by tuners. It often happens that a car with less claimed power goes faster. Probably it can be explained by different conditions and approaches to the power measurement.

Reply +1
65  

User avatar

Crispi74  1y ago @196ss

Yes, that exactly what I mean.

Reply +1
51  

Photo of Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4

Photo of Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4

Photo of Ford Sierra Cosworth 4x4

Timeline