


| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1210 kg (2668 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.49 m (177 in) long, 1.73 m (68 in) wide, 1.38 m (54 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.61 m (103 in) |
| Years built | 1987 - 1992 |
| Origin country | United Kingdom |
| Views | 22.7k |
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Grand Tour Eboladrome | 1:31.30 |
| 0 - 100 kph | 6.0 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 3.3 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 6.1 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 10.5 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 12.9 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 15.8 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 20.1 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 24.6 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.9 s @ 83.3 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 15.1 s @ 96.0 mph |
| Top speed | 248 kph (154 mph) |
| Engine type | S4, 16v, Turbo |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci / 1993 cc) |
| Power | 224 ps (221 bhp / 165 kw) |
| Torque | 276 Nm (204 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 113 ps (111 hp) |
| Power / weight | 185 ps (183 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 228 Nm (168 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 5 |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Brucezilla 5y ago
Most , especially in the UK , were tuned to stage 3 packages . 440hp (330kw). They weren’t slow.
CarElitist (guest) 14y ago
Why is this thing so slow by today's standards when other special high-performance trim cars back then can still give cars today a run for their money?
Sierranuhvadha 7y ago
yeah two seconds slower than a 420 ps Mustang mark v and at least as fast as Testarossa in dry. So slow! lmao
CarCritic 5y ago
On the contrary. This was the most successful racing car of its day, and beat the countach around the eboladrome.