| Price in Europe | €55,500 - €70,422 |
| Price in US | $43,990 - $46,625 |
| Price in Britain | £46,995 - £57,900 |
| Car type | Compact |
| Curb weight | 1415-1443 kg (3120-3181 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2023 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Gas mileage | 25.2-6.9 l/100 km (9-34 mpg US / 11-41 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 140 - 242 g/km |
| Views | 24.2k |
| Submitted by | Shwingbob |
| 0 - 30 mph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.9 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.9 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 6.4 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 7.8 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 11.7 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 14.6 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 18.2 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 21.2 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 28.2 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 45.7 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.8 s @ 88.2 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 13.0 s |
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 70 kph | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.1 s |
| 0 - 90 kph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 5.4 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 150 kph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 11.7 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 14.4 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 17.3 s |
| 0 - 230 kph | 29.0 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 34.2 s |
| 1000 m | 24.9 s @ 218.7 kph |
| Top speed | 275 kph (171 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 16.9 s |
| 18m slalom | 74.1 kph (46.0 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 140.0 kph (87.0 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.04 g (10 m/s²) |
| Engine type | turbocharged four-cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci) |
| Power | 330 ps (325 bhp / 243 kw) |
| Tested power | 321 - 336 ps (317 - 331 bhp) @ 6400 rpm |
| Tested torque | 431 Nm (318 lbft) @ 3050 rpm |
| Power / liter | 165 ps (163 hp) |
| Power / weight | 231 ps (228 bhp) / t |
| Efficiency | 30 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 28 ps |
| Transmission | six-speed manual |
| Layout | front engine, front wheel drive |
| 50 kph - 0 | 9 m (30 ft) |
| 60 kph - 0 | 13 m (42 ft) |
| 80 kph - 0 | 23 m (75 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 31 m (101 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 53 m (173 ft) |
| 150 kph - 0 | 76 m (251 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 123 m (404 ft) |
| 30 mph - 0 | 8 m (25 ft) |
| 50 mph - 0 | 22 m (71 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 43 m (142 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 94 m (307 ft) |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.8 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 5.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.0 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.0 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.9 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 11.1 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.9 s |
| 100 - 140 kph (4) | 4.1 s |
| 100 - 140 kph (5) | 5.0 s |
| 100 - 140 kph (6) | 6.4 s |
| 60 - 100 kph | 2.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 3.2 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.9 s |
| 100 - 200 kph | 13.0 s |
| 5 - 60 mph | 5.8 s |
| 30 - 70 mph | 4.5 s |
| 45 - 65 mph | 2.6 s |
| Noise @ idle | 38 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 60 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 68 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 66 dB |
| Noise @ 120 kph | 72 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 69 dB |
| Noise @ 30 mph | 63 dB |
| Noise @ 50 mph | 67 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 70 dB |
decak54 3w ago
Is it true that this FL5 that did the lap at the Ring had more turbo pressure, shorter gears, specific tires, and various weight reductions?
And then it has 265mm tires, which are quite wide compared to the alternatives from other brands.
Anyway, it's the best hot hatch, no doubt about it.
It's a shame it's a manual, in my humble opinion, and I'd be curious to see how it would fare in an AWD configuration with a dual-clutch.
humana 10m ago
theres a new and final paint job for the car
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/first-look/oh-no-new-ultimate-edition-marks-end-fl5-honda-civic-type-r
Aperson 1y ago
@FastestLaps
I contest the "Nürburgring Nordschleife Full 7:44.88" time should not relate to this. That was done using a specialized build with AC delete and additional modifications known as the "Type R S grade" which as of yet is not available for sale anywhere.
wallenieswiftie 2y ago
This car is nearly on the same level as the Mustang Dark Horse and M4 Competition, and the slightly older Camaro ZL1 and Corvette Grand Sport around the 'ring.
wallenieswiftie 2y ago
If this car had an automatic transmission or another form of a non-conventional-manual (especially with 8 or more gears), it would easily lap the 'ring in under 7:30. From my gaming experience, manuals tend to be 10-15 seconds slower than modern-day automated-shifters. Technically speaking, there are no "modern manuals," as they have basically been the same kind of manual since the 1960s. However, automatics have evolved so much quicker in advance (2-to-4-speeds were the only things available between the '40s and the '80s; 5-speeds became available in the '90s, 6-to-8-speeds in the 2000s, 9ers & 10ers from the last decade on).
BMWX5M 2y ago
Sport Auto France Supertest - Honda Civic Type R (FL5)
Circuit Val de Vienne Lap Time - 1:53,10
Vmax: 212 km/h
Max Lateral G-Force: +1,2G / -1.1G
Track Conditions: 12deg C - Dry track
Driver: Christophe Tinseau
Acceleration (km/h):
0-100: 6,4
0-160: 13,1
0-200: 21,3
0-400m: 14,3s @ 169 km/h
0-1000m: 25,5s @ 218 km/h
Braking:
200-0: -
Weight: 1429,5 kg
Weight Distribution: 62/38%
Tire Brand: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire Size: 265/30/19
Rating: 5/5
Price as tested: 70,422 €
Damn Straight.
FastestLaps 3y ago
Yes, it is a lot more expensive than previous Type R but I think this may be the most compelling new perf car for regular mortal people who can't afford 100k for a car, yet want something that has real 4 seater capacity (with people who actually have legs) and enthusiast performance (can match and beat M3 E92 on track) and freaking MANUAL gearbox (some Ferrari and Porsche buyers pay fortune for "extra" like that lol).
07CorvetteZ51 3y ago
C/D TEST RESULTS
30 mph: 2.3 sec
60 mph: 5.0 sec
100 mph: 11.7 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.5 sec @ 108 mph
130 mph: 21.2 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.8 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 10.0 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 6.3 sec
Top Speed (mfr's claim): 169 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 151 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 307 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 1.04 g
flt158 3y ago
I'm only noticing these Car & Driver acceleration figures now.
They are what I expected them to be - quick but not too quick.
The Honda Civic Type R is front wheel drive after all.
What surprises me is that Car & Driver are including all individual figures - from 0-30 up to 140 mph.
Could this be them going back to the old tradition?
I would love to think so.
Only time will tell!
Safe driving from Flt 158
kyurtseven7 3y ago
➡️ Lap time: 7.43.438
Asphalt and weather is ideal, snow is just a skin.
srr4791 3y ago
Check out the Performance calculations of 2023 Honda Civic Type R
https://flattorque.wordpress.com/2023-honda-civic-type-r/
Cocobe 3y ago
I used to say that the Civic type R looked ridiculous, and riced up.
I now say, I prefer that, than this... just looks like a sedan with an aftermarket wing. It also doesn't help that it's slower than the old car in a straight line, and marginally faster around the track, thanks to more aggressive tires.
