Image of Honda NSX

Honda NSX (facelift) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1330-1406 kg (2932-3100 lbs)
Introduced 2004
Origin country Japan
Views 24.2k

Lap times

Acceleration

0 - 100 kph5.0 s
0 - 40 mph2.7 s
0 - 60 mph5.0 s
0 - 80 mph8.0 s
0 - 100 mph11.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile9.1 s @ 89.5 mph
1/4 mile13.4 s @ 106.3 mph
Honda NSX acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed282 kph (175 mph)
700ft slalom105.9 kph (65.8 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.91 g (9 m/s²)
60 mph - 036 m (117 ft)
80 mph - 066 m (215 ft)
Noise @ idle52 dB
Noise @ 70 mph80 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type V6
Displacement 3.2 l (195 ci)
Power 290 ps (286 bhp / 213 kw)
Torque 304 Nm (224 lb-ft)
Power / liter 90 ps (89 hp)
Power / weight 212 ps (209 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 222 Nm (164 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

More Honda cars 60

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

Mach-1  14y ago

Someone really needs to do a proper Laguna Seca lap in this...

Also, doesn't the NSX have a V6 instead of an I6?

Reply
1.9k  

User avatar

Expert  16y ago

Anonomous 3.2 cars had 290hp not 276hp. First gear to 100kph does not require shift, second gear reaches 82mph.

Reply
1.4k  

User avatar

golf3diesel  16y ago

how can a civic si with 1313 kgs and 197 hp be faster than the GREAT NSX which has 276 hp

Reply
1.2k 1 reply

User avatar

Inline 6 rules  16y ago

Please correct the engine type and torque! Thanks!

Reply
927  

User avatar

Inline 6 rules  16y ago

The engine is V6 not inline 6! And the torque is 224 lbft not Nm.

Reply
749  

User avatar

ANonymous.  16y ago

Yes JC reached 1:41 on the PS2, but he didnt use a NSX, he used a NSX Type R, which is cinsiderably better in every way, still find it strange he ran the time with the R in the PS, yet in real he used the Base model, but that time in real life isnt believable, 1:40\'s no doubt, but not 1:41?, prolly closer to 1:45 or around there.

Reply
603  

User avatar

.......  16y ago

in playstation they reached 1.41..i in playstation with this car reached 1.39...1.38,9...life is not playstation..in plystation is much easier

Reply
450  

User avatar

Georg  16y ago

didn´t they reach 1:41 on the playstation?

Reply
363  

User avatar

Anonymous.  16y ago

They also said the NSX could get to do a 1:41, which i do not believe, thad be 2 seconds faster than a CayMan S PDK and a CTS-V, so i dont believe it could go that fast.

Reply
317  

User avatar

Georg  16y ago

mena3agram
6 hours ago [Delete] [Ban IP]
The car is slower than Honda Civic SI!!! How is this possible??

It was driven by a TV presenter (Clarkson from TopGear) not a proffesionel race driver or car tester..according to real race drivers he has no real driving skills

Reply
275  

User avatar

mena3agram  16y ago

The car is slower than Honda Civic SI!!! How is this possible??

Reply
204  

User avatar

BumRush  17y ago

Itsa hell of a game..lol i would love to see more NSX's round here, twas a great car. o and i did a 6:30.683 with my favabled NSX-R!! yeahhhh..lol

Reply
184  

User avatar

venom  17y ago

and he probably used s2 tires.. which are EXACTLY identical to the qualifying tires on a le mans race car lol. i tried them on an m3 gtr on the nurburgring, same 6:52 time, same response to all bumps, same grip etc. mightve thrown jeremy off a bit.

Reply
167  

User avatar

JoNny  17y ago

Yeah Jeremy Clarkson did select the NSX-R in the game, but I used the regular NSX and still managed a time in the mid 1'30's...just takes practice. Obviously real life would be different lol.

Reply
155  

User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

Ya and at least honda made a good effort for a sportscar that is still well respected! Although their F1 team was pathetic they still build a great product!!

Reply
142  

User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

if you noticed in the game he used a NSX Type R not a regular NSX.

Reply
134  

User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

lol, jeremy clarkson didn't exactly push the limit, he even said the car could go down to the 1:40 he did on gt4! obviously its not that quick but can do much better than 1:57.

Reply
124  

User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

its 276hp that only loses 12% in the drive train vs 17% for RearWheeDrive and 20% for AWD.
So in comparison, 276hp in a NSX is 242RWHP vs RWD 229RWHP vs AWD 220RWHP
so the NSX puts 22 more horses to the ground than any 4wd system. thus why the nsx appears to be a little faster on paper than it should be. These numbers can be verified through many dynos available. Thats what you get with a Mid engine RWD with a low MOI dual clutch transmission only 20 away inches from the rear wheels.

Reply
121  

User avatar

Anonymous  18y ago

Max speed 174.84 miles/h (282 km/h)
0-100 km/h 5.0 seconds
Mass 3130 kilograms (6886 lbs)
Power to Weight ratio 88.23 hp/tonne

Wow, a car that weighs 3 tonnes with 276hp can do 5 secs in 62mph?

Reply
109  

User avatar

rice  18y ago

yeah i know i know i keep fogettin to do that. its such a hasle to remember all the time yo..lol

Reply
100  

User avatar

Wads  18y ago

Rice thanks for adding so many cars but I notice that you are getting your weights mixed up.... I think you are using pounds when adding the weight in kg? This one for example probably does weight 3130lb but its not 3130kg

Reply
97  

Photo of Honda NSX facelift

Timeline