Performance Cars 04/1991:
0-30 mph 2,1 sec
0-40 mph 2,9 sec
0-50 mph 4,0 sec
0-60 mph 5,3 sec
0-70 mph 6,5 sec
0-80 mph 8,1 sec
0-90 mph 10,2 sec
0-100 mph 12,1 sec
0-110 mph 14,6 sec
0-120 mph 17,5 sec
1/4 mile - 13,7 sec 106 mph
top speed - 157 mph
Honda NSX (3.0) specs
| Price in US | $86,642 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1362-1410 kg (3003-3109 lbs) |
| Years built | 1991 - 1997 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Gas mileage | 14.4-12.4 l/100 km (16-19 mpg US / 20-23 mpg UK) |
| Views | 41.8k |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.9 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 5.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 10.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 12.1 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 14.6 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 17.5 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 24.7 s |
| Est. 0 - 140 mph | 27.8 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 45.5 s |
| Est. 0 - 160 mph | 49.2 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.1 s @ 82.6 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 13.5 s |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 21.6 s @ 127.4 mph |
| Est. 1 mile | 34.6 s @ 147.3 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| Est. 0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 50 kph | 2.1 s |
| Est. 0 - 60 kph | 2.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 70 kph | 3.2 s |
| Est. 0 - 80 kph | 4.2 s |
| Est. 0 - 90 kph | 5.0 s |
| Est. 0 - 100 kph | 5.8 s |
| Est. 0 - 110 kph | 6.7 s |
| Est. 0 - 120 kph | 7.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 130 kph | 8.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 140 kph | 10.1 s |
| Est. 0 - 150 kph | 11.5 s |
| Est. 0 - 160 kph | 12.8 s |
| Est. 0 - 170 kph | 14.3 s |
| Est. 0 - 180 kph | 15.9 s |
| Est. 0 - 190 kph | 18.3 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 21.9 s |
| Est. 0 - 210 kph | 22.9 s |
| Est. 0 - 220 kph | 26.0 s |
| Est. 0 - 230 kph | 29.7 s |
| Est. 0 - 240 kph | 37.3 s |
| Est. 0 - 250 kph | 44.4 s |
| Est. 0 - 260 kph | 53.4 s |
| Est. 100 m | 6.0 s @ 103.0 kph |
| Est. 1000 m | 25.0 s @ 217.0 kph |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 4.4 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 15.3 s |
General performance
| Top speed | 273 kph (170 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 21.6 s @ 1847 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.54 g (5 m/s²) |
| Est. emissions | 301 g/km |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.95 g (9 m/s²) |
| Noise @ idle | 49 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 78 dB |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | V6 n/a |
| Displacement | 3.0 l (183 ci) |
| Power | 274 ps (270 bhp / 202 kw) |
| Torque | 284 Nm (209 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 91 ps (90 hp) |
| Power / weight | 199 ps (196 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 206 Nm (152 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 20 PS per l/100 km |
| Transmission | 5 speed manual |
| Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| Est. 60 kph - 0 | 15 m (50 ft) |
| Est. 100 kph - 0 | 41 m (134 ft) |
| Est. 120 kph - 0 | 57 m (187 ft) |
| Est. 130 kph - 0 | 68 m (224 ft) |
| Est. 140 kph - 0 | 78 m (257 ft) |
| Est. 160 kph - 0 | 102 m (334 ft) |
| Est. 180 kph - 0 | 128 m (419 ft) |
| Est. 190 kph - 0 | 142 m (466 ft) |
| Est. 200 kph - 0 | 163 m (534 ft) |
| Est. 30 mph - 0 | 10 m (34 ft) |
| Est. 50 mph - 0 | 27 m (87 ft) |
| Est. 60 mph - 0 | 38 m (124 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (157 ft) |
NSX competition
relicaexpo 11y ago
Hi,
Seems like it’s a nice blog. So let us also add something useful in it. With all positive manufacturing data scope of import and export is increasing day by day. In mechanical field everyone want to have one stop shop for there manufacturing needs. So Relicaexpo is the ultimate solution for them.
Regards
. Relicaexpo
relicaexpo 11y ago
Hi,
Seems like it’s a nice blog. So let us also add something useful in it. With all positive manufacturing data scope of import and export is increasing day by day. In mechanical field everyone want to have one stop shop for there manufacturing needs. So Relicaexpo is the ultimate solution for them.
Regards
. Relicaexpo
expert 11y ago
@bezza. 91 Nsx weights 170lbs less than 3.2 with six speed 20+hp. For the track the coupe has better chassis and suitable for cornering. Also the suspension is more toed in and aggressive than 3.2 and smaller wheels is less turn faster, larger wheels help top speed. I believe in the numbers.
phavyarden 11y ago
1st, it has to be 0-100 km/h, not to 96 km/h, for me is almost the same, but it has to be like that, and the other thing, you have to post a source
J 12y ago
Since 160km/h is not quite 100mph, the 0-160km/h time should be (at worst) 12.0, not 12.5. Where is that from?
javi( spain) 13y ago
A lot of Scan test of autopista magazine ( spain);
http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?p=15072724#post15072724
Anonymous 13y ago
62, i mean 62 miles an hour?? why not an even number...like 60?? why an uneven number??
850ci guy 13y ago
Can someone put a better pic here?
And how about updating those 0-60's to 5.4 and 1/4 to 13.5 as specified in 3-4 links provided in above posts? - Thank you.
Anonymous 14y ago
TT Supra Titan do you have any data for 0-62mph times as Fastestlaps.com doesn't use 0-60mph times. If the NSX can do a 5.0 0-60 I guess its 0-62 would be around 5.3sec
TT Supra Titan 14y ago
Actually the 91 3.0 stock NSX runs:
5.03 sec 0-60 and 13.47 1/4mi
http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/1990-12-sci.htm
The Heavier 95 3.0 coupe as mentioned before is not a Type-R if it were it would have the Red Recaro seats and 5 Spoke Enkei-made wheels.
Leather and the 7 spoke OEM's are not available in type-R. Plus the magazine does not say type-r anywhere.
http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/1995-01-performancec
ar.htm
Then here is the even heavier NSX-T 3.0 doing 5.7 0-60http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/1996-08-motorsport.htm
The confusion comes from the 91-94 3.0L non-powersteering early cars to the 95-96 3.0L Targa available cars. the targa was 200lbs heavier than 91-94 the 95-96 coupe was still 125lbs heavier than 91-94. thats why they uped the power in 1997 3.2L to accomodate the post 1995 Targa 3200lb frame.
so.. these are the corrected numbers
91-94 NSX 3.0L 5.03 sec 0-60 & 13.47 1/4
95-96 NSX 3.0L 5.4 sec 0-60 & 13.57 1/4
95-96 NSX-T 3.0L 5.7sec 0-60 & 13.7 1/4
Read all about it here...
http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/magazine.htm
Plus if you know anything up you know you can get any NSX coupe into the 4.5 sec 0-60 range and 12sec 1/4s with $5k in bolt-ons and run 200k miles with no issues. NSX is Non-Turbo because it is road race ready thats damn fast for reliable NA power.
patricio 15y ago
heres another link showing a 1995 doing 5.4 0-60 and no drive train differences. still the 3.0l engine just added targa and abs.
http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/1995-01-performancecar.htm
patricio 15y ago
double check the 0-60 and 1/4 time. Due to how much faster it was than any ferrari and porsche at that time there was belived to be erroneus press. If you check Motor trend you will see 5.4sec.
here is link to motor trend 1990 review and test results. CLICK ON LAST IMAGE TO ZOOM
http://www.nsxprime.com/FAQ/Media/magazines/1990-12-motortrend.htm
Thanx!
