https://japanesenostalgiccar.com/honda-motocompo-fits-in-nsx/
Honda NSX (3.0) specs
| Price in US | $55,000 - $86,642 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1350-1410 kg (2976-3109 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.42 m (174 in) long, 1.81 m (71 in) wide, 1.17 m (46 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.53 m (100 in) |
| Years built | 1991 - 1997 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Gas mileage | 18.6-8.9 l/100 km (13-26 mpg US / 15-32 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 246 - 353 g/km |
| Views | 49.7k |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.9 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 5.2 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 6.5 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 8.1 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 10.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 12.1 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 14.6 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 17.5 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 23.2 s |
| Est. 0 - 140 mph | 27.8 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 45.5 s |
| Est. 0 - 160 mph | 49.2 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.1 s @ 82.6 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 13.3 s |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 21.6 s @ 127.4 mph |
| Est. 1 mile | 34.6 s @ 147.3 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.7 s |
| Est. 0 - 70 kph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.0 s |
| Est. 0 - 90 kph | 5.0 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 5.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 110 kph | 6.7 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 9.0 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 9.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 150 kph | 11.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 12.3 s |
| Est. 0 - 170 kph | 14.3 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 15.4 s |
| Est. 0 - 190 kph | 18.3 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 19.9 s |
| Est. 0 - 210 kph | 22.9 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 41.2 s |
| Est. 0 - 230 kph | 29.7 s |
| Est. 0 - 240 kph | 37.3 s |
| Est. 0 - 250 kph | 44.4 s |
| Est. 0 - 260 kph | 53.4 s |
| Est. 100 m | 6.0 s @ 103.0 kph |
| 1000 m | 24.6 s @ 216.7 kph |
General performance
| Top speed | 273 kph (170 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 21.7 s @ 1850 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.53 g (5 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 64.9 kph (40.3 mph) |
| 600ft slalom | 112.8 kph (70.1 mph) |
| 700ft slalom | 102.7 kph (63.8 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.95 g (9 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | V6 n/a |
| Displacement | 3.0 l (183 ci) |
| Power | 274 ps (270 bhp / 202 kw) |
| Torque | 284 Nm (209 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 91 ps (90 hp) |
| Power / weight | 200 ps (198 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 208 Nm (153 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 20 PS per l/100 km |
| Transmission | 5 speed manual |
| Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 60 kph - 0 | 13 m (43 ft) |
| 80 kph - 0 | 23 m (76 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 36 m (117 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 52 m (172 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 58 m (189 ft) |
| 140 kph - 0 | 72 m (235 ft) |
| 160 kph - 0 | 93 m (306 ft) |
| Est. 180 kph - 0 | 128 m (419 ft) |
| Est. 190 kph - 0 | 142 m (466 ft) |
| Est. 200 kph - 0 | 163 m (534 ft) |
| 30 mph - 0 | 9 m (29 ft) |
| Est. 50 mph - 0 | 27 m (87 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 36 m (117 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 48 m (157 ft) |
| 80 mph - 0 | 67 m (220 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 7.0 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 10.3 s |
| 60 - 120 kph (4) | 11.2 s |
| 60 - 120 kph (5) | 15.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 9.9 s |
| 60 - 100 kph | 3.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 4.3 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 4.5 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 15.5 s |
Interior noise
| Noise @ idle | 49 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 65 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 70 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 69 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 76 dB |
| Noise @ 160 kph | 81 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 78 dB |
NSX competition
FelipeBird 2m ago
Honda NSX 3.0 had 3 engine versions basically: One with 5 speed manual with 270hp (1990-1993 in Japan), 5 speed manual with 280hp (1993-1997 in Japan) and 4 speed automatic with 252hp.
FastestLaps 2y ago
The crop on desktop is just fantastic. Only doors visible. And, of course, that full VGA resolution experience 😭
Shwingbob 4y ago
Tsukuba lap is 1:07.49 From best motoring series 1996 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsjyEgzIA_Q
196ss 4y ago
Quattroroute 07/1991:
Top speed – 272.962 kph (probably calculated)
0-60 – 2.7
0-80 – 4.0
0-100 – 5.6
0-120 – 7.4
0-140 – 9.6
0-160 – 12.3
0-180 – 15.4
0-200 – 19.9
400m – 13.6 sec 168.9 kph
1000m – 24.6 sec 216.7 kph
Braking:
60-0 – 13.1m
80-0 – 23.3m
100-0 – 36.5m
120-0 – 52.5m
140-0 – 71.7m
160-0 – 93.4m
TypeF173 5y ago
Few people will recall the the absolute ripples and waves the Honda NSX created in the "exotic" market. I won't name who specifically, but I recall somebody stating in terms other than just metrics it put the "fear of God in to the opposition."
In certain respects. It did.
TypeF173 5y ago
First Place: Acura NSX, Corvette ZR1, Porsche 911, Ferrari 348ts, Lotus Esprit Turbo SE so very SORRY!
"1990 Acura NSX
270-hp V-6, 5-sp manual, 3020 lb
Base/as-tested price (C/D EST): $58,000/$58,300
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 5.2 sec
1/4 mile: 13.8 sec @ 102 mph
Top speed: 163 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 157 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.86 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 19 mpg."
Very interesting.
196ss 5y ago
Automobil Revue, № 39, 19.09.1991:
Curb weight - 1350 kg (42%/58%)
Acceleration (2 persons +10 kg) -
0-40 kph 1,9 sec
0-60 kph 3,0 sec
0-80 kph 4,4 sec
0-100 kph 6,1 sec
0-120 kph 8,1 sec
0-140 kph 10,7 sec
0-160 kph 13,4 sec
0-180 kph 17,0 sec
0-200 kph 21,8 sec
0-220 kph 41,2 sec
1000 m - 25,4 sec
Top speed - 255 kph
relicaexpo 16y ago
Hi,
Seems like it’s a nice blog. So let us also add something useful in it. With all positive manufacturing data scope of import and export is increasing day by day. In mechanical field everyone want to have one stop shop for there manufacturing needs. So Relicaexpo is the ultimate solution for them.
Regards
. Relicaexpo
relicaexpo 16y ago
Hi,
Seems like it’s a nice blog. So let us also add something useful in it. With all positive manufacturing data scope of import and export is increasing day by day. In mechanical field everyone want to have one stop shop for there manufacturing needs. So Relicaexpo is the ultimate solution for them.
Regards
. Relicaexpo
expert 16y ago
@bezza. 91 Nsx weights 170lbs less than 3.2 with six speed 20+hp. For the track the coupe has better chassis and suitable for cornering. Also the suspension is more toed in and aggressive than 3.2 and smaller wheels is less turn faster, larger wheels help top speed. I believe in the numbers.
phavyarden 16y ago
1st, it has to be 0-100 km/h, not to 96 km/h, for me is almost the same, but it has to be like that, and the other thing, you have to post a source
J 16y ago
Since 160km/h is not quite 100mph, the 0-160km/h time should be (at worst) 12.0, not 12.5. Where is that from?
javi( spain) 18y ago
A lot of Scan test of autopista magazine ( spain);
http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?p=15072724#post15072724
