Koenigsegg CCR specs

https://www.motor1.com/news/399467/koenigsegg-ccx-dyno-run-video/

Quote>"When Was The Last Time You Saw A Koenigsegg CCX On A Dyno?"

"Compared to the latest crop of crazy electrified supercars, its peak output of 806 horsepower (601 kilowatts) and 679 pound-feet (920 Newton-meters) of torque may seem a bit outdated but, trust us, its performance is still admirable."

Quote>"The best number the supercar registered was 653 wheel horsepower."

I see. Incredibly rare dyno video. Percentage % between manufacturer specifications claims and dyno results reported> = 20.9733% difference.

That's essentially 21%. The car is a manual transmission and admittedly she's no longer factory manufacturer production fresh but it still seems too high.

The reasonable answer is based on the previous CC8S which underperformed in Autocar testing is it wasn't making "806hp" in the first place.

So 653x15%= 751hp which seems to be more accurate. Vis a vis testing done and compared to the McLaren F1. Which in acceleration NONE of them did until the Koenigsegg Agera R was tested. Top speed was unidirectional and only achieved under 1MPH more.

Still whatever, incredible machines. I wasn't too bothered by the ones that came after. My life circumstances changed and cars weren't a priority. But I'll look at those too.

Hoppel, you entered Swedish krone as euros and price for this appeared as 8.8 million euro and for 911 Carrera 1 million euro...

Only usd and eur are supported (price in euro zone and price in United States)

Automotor und Sport Sweden 1/2009:
0-60 kph 2,1 s
0-80 kph 3,0 s
0-100 kph 3,7 s
0-120 kph 4,3 s
0-140 kph 5,5 s
0-160 kph 6,5 s
0-180 kph 7,9 s
0-200 kph 9,3 s
0-220 kph 11,0 s
0-240 kph 13,7 s
0-260 kph 16,2 s
0-300 kph 24,9 s
1/4 mile: 11.2 s 224 kph
Mantorp laptime:1:27,5 Driver:Robin Rudholm
http://egmont-media.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ams/biltester_pdf/090101.pdf

That 1/4-mile time has BS written all over it...

Please delete the 1/4 mile time!

I actually found a direct link to the scans good gamer was referring to! http://egmont-media.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ams/biltester_pdf/090101.pdf

0-100 kph: 3.7 sec
0-200 kph: 9.3 sec
0-300 kph: 24.9 sec

Read the Swedish AMS numbers below (please)

Ill add it when im able too....Eventually...-_-

@FL or any other contributers.Can anyone here add Mantorp lap time for CCR and please correct the CCR's 1/4 mile time.9s is too fast to be believeable,11.2s seems more accurate as in the test.Scans are available in the link.

Why doesn't anyone add Mantorp track lap for CCR.When I showed the scans.
Issue 1/2009 Automotor und Sport Sweden
Lap time:1:27.5 Driver:Robin Rudholm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/145713811@N04/30086523462/in/photostream/
Performance Figures(kph)
0-60-2.1s
0-80 3s
0-100 3.7s
0-120 4.3s
0-140 5.5s
0-160 6.6s
0-180 7.9s
0-200 9.3s
0-220 11s
0-240 13.7s
0-260 16.2s
0-300 24.9s
Quartermile time 11.2s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/145713811@N04/29571891794/in/photostream/

What the hell! Did I actually automatically approve the change to the quartermile trap speed?! (How could I...I'm not a moderator!) Lol At first it was 133 mph. While the ET isn't changed, of course.

EDIT: When I was on the Ford GT, I saw the 11.3 standing on the CCR behind the FGT, and I noticed it said 11.3 @ 146.

EDIT EDIT: This site still says 135 mph in the 1/4 mile: https://accelerationtimes.com/models/koenigsegg-ccr

I think by "9 seconds," Koenigsegg is meaning about 9.9 seconds. Lmao

they have claimed it but have they tested it?it won't do it in 3.2s fastest i have seen was 3.9s(every other record runs have video).
if you have video then give me the link.
and once again name any koenigsegg which reached claimed topspeed.they overestimate their cars way over the limit.
car claimed speed actual
agera r 273mph 260mph
ccx 250 245
ccr 245 241
every other super car manufacturer at least has claimed performance

Even AutoBild claims 3.2 to 62 mph (100 kph) and a 395 kph top speed: http://www.autobild.de/bilder/koenigsegg-ccr-20649.html#bild2

Your a fool if you think this does 9 flat. With a "real" pro and perfect conditions it could "Dip" into the 9s, But its not doing a 9 flat, I have seen what a CC 8S can do on a strip in person, But this aint getting that claimed time, Its just retarded they would even claim that.

the 395km/h was the claimed topspeed.in real life it is observed to reach 388km/h during topspeed run
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbxxG2Kbas0

Max speed: 395 kph

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/supertest/exot-koenigsegg-ccr-im-supertest-auf-der-nordschleife-1036010.html?show=4

9 seconds flat and 146 mph? That is impossible! The 918 does 9.8 seconds @ 148 mph and it has a much better launch.

i don't believe any of those specification as koenigssegg do not have claimed peformance most of these time.for eg agera r topspeed was claimed to be 273mph but is observed to reach only 260mph and excuse was that they didn't have long track.then how did hennessey venom(271mph) set its top speed record?
but 0-60mph seems to be correct there is no way it will do 1/4 miles in 9s.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

@ Donkey

It has 564 HP per tonne, not total output.

0-62 mph: 2.64 sec
0-100 mph: 5.04 sec
1/4 mile: 9.99 @ 148.03 mph
0-100-0 mph: 8.20 sec
Top speed: 242.2 mph

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

The actual power output is 795 horsepower as stated above, it takes a lot more than 564 horsepower to reach its 245 MPH top speed, and aerodynamics has nothing to do with how much horsepower an engine produces.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.