Image of Koenigsegg Regera

Koenigsegg Regera specs

Car type Convertible
Curb weight 1628 kg (3589 lbs)
Dimensions 4.56 m (180 in) long, 2.05 m (81 in) wide, 1.11 m (44 in) high
Wheelbase 2.66 m (105 in)
Introduced 2016
Origin country Sweden
Views 35.6k
Submitted by Thiago_Lins

Lap times

Track Time
Ring Knutstorp 1:03.84


0 - 100 kph2.8 s
0 - 300 kph12.3 s
Top speed410 kph (255 mph)
Downforce @ 250 kph450 kg (992 lbs)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8 Twin Turbo
Displacement 5.0 l (305 ci)
Power 1500 ps (1479 bhp / 1103 kw)
Torque 2000 Nm (1475 lb-ft)
Power / liter 300 ps (296 hp)
Power / weight 921 ps (909 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 1229 Nm (906 lb-ft) / t
Layout middle engine, rear wheel drive
User avatar
User avatar

KoenigseggNerd  1w ago

Anddd all 80 customer Regera's have been accounted for. Regera production is officially over after 3 years. The last few cars are doing testing, but soon Jesko production will be in full force!

User avatar

TypeF173  1w ago


User avatar

Oliver   2w ago


BATSHIT crazy?😂

User avatar

Jesskoen  2w ago

The Regera can take 1.7 Lateral Gs

User avatar

hostboy  3w ago

My performance estimates:
3.5 sec to 60 mph
5.9 sec to 100 mph
8.5 sec to 150 mph
13.2 sec to 200 mph
10.4 sec @ 168 mph (1/4-mile from dead stop)
9.8 sec @ 172 mph (prepped dragstrip with rollout subtracted)
265 mph (top speed)

MT Figure-8 = ((900/(30/20)x(2138))/0.132)/2085))x1.00x0.71x6.5 = 21.5 sec @ 1.38 G
Nordschleife = ((20600m/(300km/h/((204m)x0.3048m))x(2138kg/2085hp)/2.0g)x0.0095x4.25 = 7:06
TG Test Track = (4713lb/2085hp)x((1.75mi)x12)x1.00x.71x2.25 = 1:14

User avatar

KoenigseggNerd  3w ago

Regera production is nearly over, the last few chassis have been delivered to their respective owners. I believe only 2-3 are still testing and need to be delivered

User avatar

JESSKOEN  3m ago

The Regera has taken 1.7 Lateral Gs!!! maybe more?

User avatar

TypeF173  3m ago


User avatar

TypeF173  3m ago

Volkswagen Golf absolutely TRASHES (!) Koenigsegg Regera! LOL! What is this machine? ~ Boba Golf? Possibly.


And please no Ktards have a FANNY attack, it is what it is. A Bugatti Chiron would be the same!


User avatar

TypeF173  3m ago

Confirmed standing 1/4 1/2 and 1 mile Koenigsegg Regera speeds. Texas Mile!

1/4= 140.80MPH
1/2= 173.70MPH
1= 214.20MPH


In her first pass apparently she achieved 188MPH for the standing mile. But I haven't seen a time slip yet.

Which just shows away from factory testing times go to pot with weather and non professional driving standards. And I don't gives two FK's if it's "good" or "bad" Bugatti SSC Ferrari or Lamborghini give me, SHOW me proof.

Also someone told me that Koenigsegg as a manufacturer has X amount of Regera's in their own physical ownership in Sweden.

The number, and you know I like them LOL, seemed way too high so it's something else to very verify, but even if it's on the lower end I don't understand why this car has never been independently timed or verified.

Well, above now it has now to a degree. ;)

Edit: in the back of my mind the benchmarking process is begining, but what would a Ferrari SF90 or the Pagani Huyara BC achieve?

As I said elsewhere, too much time around American's.

User avatar

TypeF173  4m ago

Well COMPLETELY by coincidence, I assure you of that absolutely. A figure, a very specific figure indeed has emerged for the power output of the Koenigsegg Regera fitted with the below optional extra engine upgrade and it is quote>"1,757 hp."

And that's from people that should know, but for now I'll try to verify that figure there's no need throw unnecessary links about. On THIS occasion.

User avatar

TypeF173  4m ago

Koenigsegg>"Environmental Power Upgrade was selected, adding 200 hp when running E85 fuel."

The standard specifications car already has flexible fuel capabilities? So?

Plus the price of the "Ghost Package" and "Tresex" carbon fibre wheels. These two were definitely fitted to the 0-400-0km/h car. I believe there's a DISTINCT possibility the above which is the old 1MW engine upgrade was fitted too, but as yet can't prove it, as the power horsepower ratings for the standard specifications are all over the place. Some state 1500hp average some state crazy peak figures.

The figure is more likely above 1600hp. We will eventually find out.

But we or should I say me absolutely, LOL!, knows how much difference 200hp makes to a hypercars performance. Verified.

User avatar

TypeF173  4m ago

0-300km/h in DEVELOPMENTAL car and claiming a "record?". For what pre production prototype's? Because, if you are, then your legitimising Bugatti's and Rimac's? Already talked to death about the first and the second newly more recently.

I've already talked about both of them, and the answer is YES verified NO record. Period.

The concerning thing is though there's always more with them.

User avatar

TypeF173  5m ago

So now we beging to understand how this flex fuel monster does what it does. With E85 it jumps to nearly 1700hp and 2100NM of torque. Becoming a 1:1 power to weight ratio production car WITH the driver.

The crazy thing is it's probably got even more power as 1500hp is an average. So it's actually plus that figure anyway!

*E85 has an octane rating from 100 to 105 octane rating plus+.

It's my absolute firm belief that the Bugatti Chiron Supersport can match it to 300k/h maybe even 322km/h, but beyond is slightly more difficult to map out.

Using my own calculations based on what happened in the United States of America the Bugatti Chiron Supersport fuelled with COMPLETELY legal 100 octane PUMP premium fuels could actually match the horsepower rating by joining the 1700hp plus+ "crew". Which when you think about it is astonishing.

I know the relative "numbers" for acceleration for both cars, and I did this excercise in a benchmarking opportunity against the Hennessey Venom F5. I went sideways a little, but still we get a clearer picture of what's coming now, for all of them.

User avatar

TypeF173  5m ago

Quote>"1100 Hp of combustion engine power on 91 octane DIN or 95 octane RON (a bit more on E85)."

That's about as useful as a chocolate strawberry fireguard at Christmas? A "bit" isn't particularly scientific and it does not pass scrutiny. So we go backwards in time!

Quote>"The Agera R’s fuel system has enough flow capacity to generate 1140hp and 1200Nm of torque on E85."

Quote>"As 95 octane fuel has less octane than ethanol E85, the power is reduced to 960hp with 1100Nm of torque due to the boost pressure and ignition timing being altered to match the fuel characteristics."

1140hp- 960hp= 180hp gain ~ utilising E85 fuels
1200NM- 1100NM= 100NM gain ~ utilising E85 fuels

The engines are essentially the same anyway between the two.

In actual fact it could be far higher, SSC Tuatara Hennessey F5 Venom and Koenigsegg's own Jesko are proof.

But for the purposes of this segment that's fine as proven above.

User avatar

TypeF173  5m ago

Koenigsegg Regera on the Texas Mile! Finally independently verified data! It achieved, well, 216MPH?


I'll have to watch it again~ sometime. But my initial impressions are yes there's very obviously a headwind. But is it continuos intensity, prolonged exposure and consistent strength on the front of the car from 0.001- 0.9999 miles? I don't think so.

Anyway the driver is apparently a professional racer so I guess we can rule that out.

I know usually Texas Mile has a ticket with 1/4 1/2 and I believe 3/4 mile timings or speeds on it. They did for Ford GT that 300MPH plus? I want to see it! Who doesn't?

So this highlights whilst factory manufacturer tests and magazine tests are often the quickest where conditions are controlled as much as possible, in the real World things are not quite so controllable.

The factory manufacturer managed circa 249MPH during it's test record slightly over the mile marker, and this managed 216MPH accordingly to Texas Mile?

249- 216= 33MPH difference? Or 14.19% percentage difference between the two!

Statistically significant and figuratively too.

I know it was a relatively soft start but still. Line it up, and get moving get the time+speed and go home!

User avatar

TypeF173  5m ago

Koenigsegg Regera 0-300km/h= 12.3 0-400km/h= 19 "around" 300-400km/h this equals= 6.7 second! WTF!

Chris Koenigsegg's own words in the video in this comment.

As per video BELOW this one "pixel" or "frame" measurements 300-400km/h tested= 22.87-12.5= 10.37 seconds

6.7 manufacturer claim to 10.37 manufacturer tests results= 42.999% difference between the two figures.

And there's me giving Bugatti hell, seemingly for nothing now!


Anyway, nothing else really to say.

User avatar

TypeF173  6m ago


0-100km/h= 3.7
0-200km/h= 7.2
0-300km/h= 12.5

Looks like the measurement were taken with "pixels" as per Sourced and cited and quoted data below.

My own first attempt first draft calculations were actually quicker to 300km/h 10 months ago!


User avatar

flt158  6m ago

Here is a tiny piece of information for fans of the Koenigsegg cars. I read in Autocar recently that the Regera is still in production. No doubt there are some future owners of this hypercar still awaiting delivery.

Flt 158

User avatar

Adam  7m ago

@fastestlaps is there a way to sort cars by power to weight ratio, if so how?

User avatar

Anonymous  8m ago

Post content redacted by Advanced BS Detector (ABSD)â„¢

User avatar

Corvolet3  8m ago

The Regera is just a deformed and uglier Agera. Change my mind.

User avatar

dr. cosimo  8m ago

egg-man playing the green card :)

User avatar

Cloxxki  8m ago


Despite only managing 240 kph on the bits between corners.
The Senna time may not be super competitive but still cool that Koenigsegg are at a track and timing something.

User avatar

TypeF173  10m ago

Quote>"The Regera WILL reach 0-100 km/h in 2.8 seconds, 0-200 in just 6.6 seconds and 0-300 in a blistering 10.9 seconds. Koenigsegg estimate a 0-400 km/h time of 20 seconds."

Actually NO it won't. Rounded up 3 seconds off at 400km/h.

User avatar

TypeF173  10m ago

Quote>"Used a pixel measure tool to find some metrics from the graph. I feel these are 90-95% accurate. Impossible to be completely accurate but it was fun anyway.

0-100 kph = 3.6 sec

0-200 kph = 7.1 sec

0-300 kph = 12.4 sec

0-400 kph = 22.7 sec (Actual is 22.8 sec)

0-60 mph = 3.57 sec

0-100 mph = 5.7 sec

0-200 mph = 13.7 sec

1/4 mile estimated at 10.2@163

Edit: 1/4 mile was actually 10.2."

I never really shared this because I was triggered by that 0-200MPH time in comparison to the Bugatti Chiron and atleast I'm honest!

Anyway not too fussed they pulled it back and UGR and Pininfarina will trash it anyway.

Also there's almost an IDENTICAL data set in the comments section from someone completely independent. This author is also present they are different people in 0-400-0km/h run.

It's OBVIOUS the Koenigsegg Regera has hit NONE of it's 2016 acceleration claims on the Koenigsegg website.

Has it got "records" yes absolutely well done. Has it QUALIFIED it's claims. Absolutely not.

User avatar

TypeF173  10m ago

So Bugatti Chiron Supersport matches it or is quicker slightly to 186MPH or 300km/h. In fact relatively equal to 200MPH so they've pulled it right back. Bugatti have narrowed the gap to 250MPH by FOUR seconds and would power past the 255MPH limited Koenigsegg to 273MPH. Bugatti's usually go about 2MPH over. Call it 275MPH so +20MPH difference.

Factor in the DCT 1600NM from 2000-7000rpm and fourwheel drive. Then the unimpeachable interiors (second perhaps to only Pagani) and stunningly crafted exterior, the build quality is second to NONE. Then as I thought the Bugatti has rocketed back to number 1 in my books. Above even the Mclaren Speedtail. Oo

The Koenigsegg is a nice car but that gearbox is too weird.

User avatar

TypeF173  1y ago

These are my calculations. There's a perfectly scientific reasoning to their creation but ultimately how accurate they will be in the final analysis only the manufacturer knows. They've done three 0-400-0km/h runs individually but published full metrics for none unfortunately and frustratingly. Anyway here goes>

0-100= 3.756
0-200= 7.556
0-300= 11.856
0-400= 22.87
400-0= 8.62
0-400-0km/h= 31.49

100-200= 3.8
200-300= 4.3
300-400= 11.014

I did time the 0-100km/h on the official video prior to this and it's not far from my calculation. Also the 0-300km/h metric was announced as 11.65 seconds for a developmental car not this specific one but we can use it anyway and it was stated that was slightly faster. So that metric is seemingly good too.

So I've done as much as possible. :)

User avatar

Fanz  1y ago

the 0-300 time was updated yesterday