Image of Lamborghini Aventador LP750-4 SV

Lamborghini Aventador LP750-4 SV specs

Price in Europe €392,600 - €431,240
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1525-1769 kg (3362-3900 lbs)
Introduced 2016
Origin country Italy
Gas mileage 30.0-13.1 l/100 km (8-18 mpg US / 9-22 mpg UK)
Views 107.5k
Submitted by Thiago_Lins

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph1.0 s
0 - 40 mph1.4 s
0 - 50 mph2.0 s
0 - 60 mph2.4 s
0 - 70 mph3.3 s
0 - 100 mph5.7 s
0 - 130 mph9.5 s
0 - 140 mph11.2 s
0 - 150 mph13.1 s
0 - 160 mph15.3 s
0 - 170 mph18.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.1 s @ 112.5 mph
1/4 mile10.4 s @ 136.3 mph
Est. 1/2 mile17.1 s @ 168.4 mph

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph0.9 s
0 - 50 kph1.2 s
0 - 60 kph1.4 s
0 - 80 kph2.0 s
0 - 100 kph2.8 s
0 - 110 kph3.5 s
0 - 120 kph3.6 s
0 - 130 kph4.2 s
0 - 140 kph4.7 s
0 - 150 kph5.6 s
0 - 160 kph5.7 s
0 - 170 kph6.9 s
0 - 180 kph7.2 s
0 - 200 kph8.5 s
0 - 250 kph13.8 s
0 - 300 kph24.0 s
100 m4.5 s @ 135.6 kph
1000 m19.0 s
Lamborghini Aventador LP750-4 SV acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed353 kph (219 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 010.1 s @ 735 ft
Est. max acceleration1.15 g (11 m/s²)
18m slalom72.8 kph (45.2 mph)
36m slalom142.1 kph (88.3 mph)
Est. emissions342 g/km
Lateral acceleration1.05 g (10 m/s²)
Noise @ idle60 dB
Noise @ 70 mph73 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type V12
Displacement 6.5 l (397 ci)
Power 750 ps (740 bhp / 552 kw) @ 8400 rpm
Torque 690 Nm (509 lb-ft) @ 5500 rpm
Power / liter 115 ps (114 hp)
Power / weight 441 ps (435 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 406 Nm (300 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 39 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 9 ps
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

Braking distance

60 kph - 012 m (39 ft)
100 kph - 030 m (98 ft)
120 kph - 044 m (143 ft)
140 kph - 059 m (192 ft)
160 kph - 076 m (248 ft)
200 kph - 0122 m (401 ft)
300 kph - 0264 m (864 ft)
60 mph - 030 m (99 ft)
70 mph - 045 m (147 ft)

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)2.9 s
60 - 100 kph (5)3.9 s
80 - 120 kph (5)3.7 s
80 - 120 kph (6)5.1 s
100 - 140 kph (5)3.9 s
100 - 140 kph (6)5.1 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph2.1 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph5.7 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph15.5 s
User avatar
User avatar

Lambolover  2d ago

As I was starting to have faith in this channel it hit me like a brick in the face

 

11.55 sec at 116 mph in an SV with launch control
Even grannys won't get these times

Here's an SV Roadster on Sport mode with no launch control doing the same time with 6 mph higher trap

 

 

User avatar

SpeedKing  1d ago

I laugh at Lovecars drag races. They posted a race between a Pista Spider vs 600LT and got 11.57 @ 116mph vs 11.16 @ 119 mph. That is embarrassing and utter bullshit...


User avatar

Lambolover  1d ago @SpeedKing

They have so much potential but they just ruin it with stupid mistakes and calling it "real world conditions"


User avatar

SpeedKing  1d ago @Lambolover

"Real world" bullshit is what it is lol


User avatar

SpeedKing  1d ago

Even though it's carwow this is more realistic, 10.8 and even 10.6 over the 1/4 is possible if you do donuts to heat the tyres...

 


User avatar

Lambolover  1d ago @SpeedKing

Yianni got 10.5 with an S Roadster so SV coupe could also get a 10.5 with him at the wheel


User avatar

Cocobe  1d ago @SpeedKing

Real world is that most drivers aren’t really capable of driving their cars at their limit, and most people don’t use launch control. Hell, I haven’t used launch control on my car ever before too. Like why would I do that at a set of traffic lights?


User avatar

SpeedKing  1d ago @Lambolover

By far the biggest issue with the Aventadors is their violent launch and slow gear changes. The G's in 0.2 sec increments with launch control are 1.5(massive)/0.8/1.4/0.7/1.2 then the first to second gear change is 0.9G's which is absolutely ridiculous. A DCT would make the Aventadors considerably quicker.


User avatar

Lambolover  1d ago @SpeedKing

I wish they put a DCT and put 2 options in ego mode for transmission
because the feeling that single clutch has is awesome


User avatar

SpeedKing  23h ago @Lambolover

The launch in an Aventador is savage and it stutters badly which is why the 60ft times are 2/10s slower than many other supercars. A 1.8 sec 60ft is not good enough to win races whereas both the TurboS and TaycanTS will consistently do 1.6 sec and better. This is why their 1/4 mile times are in the low to mid 10's...


User avatar

Corvolet3  23h ago @SpeedKing

It's about time the Aventador gets replaced, it's simply outdated.


User avatar

SpeedKing  22h ago @Cocobe

True enough and launch control is overkill on the street. You definitely don't need it in a Huracan because the throttle response is pretty much instant down low and it pulls hard. Of course it can't match the instant torque of high performance EV's but i don't care because it's more about the aesthetics and sound that gives me the buzz...


User avatar

Cocobe  17h ago @SpeedKing

Actually I think that NA cars prefer to not use launch control when racing against turbo charged cars since turbo cars need boost to get the power on demand. =). The Aventador loses out in the launch because of its dated transmission, which honestly, is more of a problem for me about parking and navigating tight city traffic than losing out on a drag race.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4m ago

At 2:54 in the video that Lambo sounds like an F1 car! :O

 


User avatar

Lambo lover  10m ago

Aventador SV's 166.59 mph trap in 1/2 mile
https://youtu.be/vgMlCSP0W8w


User avatar

fakekillerfour  3y ago

Aventador Superveloce Jota may have lapped the ring in 6:45
https://www.carscoops.com/2018/07/lamborghini-aventador-svj-may-lapped-ring-645/


User avatar

LAmboLaD  3y ago

Best car ever...luv no turbo v12


User avatar

Lambo lover  3y ago

0-300 in 23.5 sec and I think it can do 1.2 mile under 19



User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

the lp750-4 sv should do 1:44.5-1:45 at lemansbugatti


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

Simple math logic. It's easier to find 1 example of a Ferrari less than 1500kg than it is to prove every one is over 1500kg.

Why would anyone ask someone to weigh all the Ferrari cars in the world before they'd believe in something. That's just ridiculous


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

...Unless you can show me a single test where's it's actually weighed at Your claimed weight?...

I'll be here.


User avatar

SolidSnake7685  4y ago

And you have surely weighed every 488 GTB out there. Alrighty.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

Exactly, Wth would anyone use a company's claimed weight figure? You would think this day n age people would realize it's total bs weather it's a dry weight claim or wet


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

Ferrari weights have always been bullcrap. And you're a donkey to just go with their figures and say... "oh it's lighter than its competitors"

Ferrari also quotes the Laferrari dry weight of 1255kg. Actual weight 1585kg? I'm guessing batteries are considered "wet weight" in the discription too. 488 GTB's have been tested at above 1600+kg, Doesn't matter what the Ferrari weight say it is. And if to get to the claimed weight you need $150k in carbon fiber options, then that's NOT the weight of the car. The weight of the car should be based on the base model selling price.
and what the fxxk are you saying a fully loaded 488 is still lighter than the ACR. how much is 1600+kg is more than any ACR I've seen tested.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

It doesnt matter what Ferrari quotes, or anyone for that matter, Why? Because there never real weight figures, Thats damn near true for all companys with exception to a few, No 488, Atleast that im aware of, Has EVER been weighed at 3252lbs,, The lowest has been 3402Lbs, Thats almost 200lbs heavier then your quote, And even with options on a 488, Its not gonna approach 200lbs more, Maybe with everything filled including luggage and every heaviest option its a possibility, But the fact is, This generations ACR, Hell this generations SRT Viper, Is in fact Lighter then ANY current Ferrari, The lightest Viper tested has been tested at 3,310Lbs, The lightest Ferrari currently is the 488, At 3423Lbs, Theres really no point in Debating, Hell i think the heaviest weight of an ACR is the lowest weight of the 488. So weather its standard equipment, Or every or certain options, A 488 is heavier then todays SRT Viper, And i didnt bring up anything about aero.


User avatar

SolidSnake7685  4y ago

@BR2+

Well, Ferrari quotes the 488 GTB as 3252lbs with additional equipment, and a dry weight of 3020lbs. The current generation of ACR is a totally different vehicle, with a totally different aero, no need to bring it up.

Unless its a custom built with aftermarket parts, no 2008 ACR is lighter than a 488 GTB. As said before, a standard equipped GTB is still a couple pounds lighter than a stripped ACR. Let alone the regular one.


User avatar

SolidSnake7685  4y ago

@saxy

It already lacks floor mats and insulation, plus alot of stuff which is regular in the Ferrari, and its STILL heavier. But yeah... in theory, a custom built 'could' be lighter.

Carbon monocoque, cut off the rooftop, maybe even thrash the windscreen vipers (see what i did here?)

But we're missing the point, and it stands. Even a stuffed 488 GTB weighs less than a regular ACR. Thats it.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

...Right, No test of the 488 has ever had it down below 3300lbs, Hell i havent seen one below 3400lbs, And most of the options on the 488 do not make it lighter or heavier by 200lbs, Hell mots options are a bit of carbon fiber that wont even effect the car, The lightest an ACR has weighted in the last generation was 3,339Lbs or 1,514Kg, The heaviest was over 3,400lbs,That includes the Hardcore package with deleted Ac/Radio The lightest this generation has weighed was 3,310Lbs or 1,501Kg, So no the 488 GTB is not a lighter car, And im not talking about Dry weight.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

if you spend $150,000 in options... LOL i'm SURE you can get the Viper down to a much lighter weight...


User avatar

SolidSnake7685  4y ago

As i said, with/without certain extras. Pretty sure the 488 GTB weighs less WITHOUT the HiFi system, telemetry kit, extra luggage compartment options, fire extinguisher, suspension lifter, extra electronics, like radiator fan & a few extra cameras.

It all depends on what you choose. Even if you strip the ACR (no AC, no radio), you can't get the Viper down to 1530kg, with a lighter GTB (still with AC and radio) weighing in at 1475kg.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

lol solidsnake, he 488 without the extras weigh MORE. The minimum weight is quoted with $100-150k in carbon fiber and lightening options


User avatar

SolidSnake7685  4y ago

@BR2+

"So no, Its still not lighter, 3423Lbs/1552Kgs Vs 3339Lbs/1514Kgs"

The ACR weighs 3408lbs, or 1546kg. The 488 GTB weighs 3404lbs, or 1544kg. The 488 GTB with/without certain extras weighs just 3252lbs, or 1475kg.

Either way, the Viper ACR is the heavier vehicle.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

There's a bug difference between magazine latimes and manufacturers laptimes.


User avatar

hmdqyg  4y ago

Lambo's nurburgring lap times always looks fishy. This car lapped over 20 seconds faster than 488 GTB on nurburgring, but on every other tests this car is slower.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

Strolling in Korea today I saw 3 in a row rumbling down a small street.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

....If you happened to notice, Which you clearly did, I said "Last Gen" Viper ACR....

So no, Its still not lighter, 3423Lbs/1552Kgs Vs 3339Lbs/1514Kgs, Not every data is "updated" with the newest info, And simply because the new ACR hasnt done a Ring run proves what exactly?..

And yes Top Gear "was' the best car tv show araound, But Everyone knew Cars were its second nature, Thas why not many people took its laps seriously.

And the F1 drivers, Or any driver on there just want the "Fastest Lap" for fun, Nobody really gives a shite about being number 1, There all just happy being on Top Gear, Do you not even see what they do in the car or how alot of them behave? Being the slowest on Top Gear is in NO way humiliating, And you actually think there "Reputation" is on the line for that? LOLOLOL, Did you just start watching TG?..


User avatar

C.J.   4y ago

First of all..i was talking about the 2008 Viper ACR (check my comment: "Take a look at the Viper ACR 2008" ). In this case the 488 it is LIGHTER than 2008 ACR not the new one..because the new one didn't had a laptime on Nurburghring (wonder why?) . Second : yes top gear is an entertainment TV show...but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have it's own "Respect and Decency". Top Gear UK is one of the most watched TV car show of the world (or probably the NR.1 car TV show)...so do you think that an F1 driver comes to this show to humiliate himself in front of millions of people by being the slowest F1 driver? Think again? It's their reputation in front of the world and fans....Third: in my comment i said the word (speed) with ("....")...which was a metaphorical form to say....so a "metaphoric speed isn't the same with the "speed itself"....I have my own way of speaking or my own style...whatever you wanted to call it...doesn't matter. But I admit my mistake : yes the Aventador SV had the P Zero Corsa tyres on the Willow Springs. My mistake.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

Dudes gotta be FakeKilerFours brother....

But a couple things..

A 488 isnt lighter then a last gen Viper ACR at 3339lbs compared to 3423lbs, Nor aerodynamically unless you mean better Cd over downforce.

2: On Willow Springs it did in fact have its bespoke Pirelli PZero tyres, Thats a fact, Only comes with one.

3: NObody takes TopGear laptimes seriously, Its TG, Its an entertainment comedy show first, Car show second, MotorTrend is a car show first, Entertainment show second(Channel)

4:...You say the Nurburgring wasnt made for speed?....How many other tracks have a 1 mile straight with a down hill section? And how many tracks can even a road car hit over 170mph plus on "Multiple" locations? And you say its NOT made for speed? lol The ring, Is just another track, It just happens to be longer with more roadworthy pavement.


User avatar

C.J.   4y ago

Again......what to say and you, now. I just have respected what must be respected. And when someone expresses his opinion of something....and you answered with a word like: "crap" ....it is an insult to the freedom of expression of individual opinions. And I know you're trying to avoid the subject. So don't bother.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

I haven't posted any more reasoning because you're way too far up Lamborghini's bottom to listen. Not worth my time. And sorry... the previous comment contained no insults. You should check English or your state of mind. This comment does though.


User avatar

C.J.   4y ago

Hmmm...what to say you, now. Because you didn't had an answer, you've just posted an insult there...and there you have...and do not try to argue me...because i know i'm right. Any person who becomes frustrate start insulting. Is called the human psychology ..Sorry..but it's the truth.