A road test by The Fast Lane got an indicated 201 mph on the car's speedometer (probably 195-199 in real life) and 0-100 mph in 10 seconds. This was achieved by a number of things:
The car had optional "race cams" in the engine, it was one of the European "downdraft" carbureted models, and it had a factory-installed high-performance airbox, probably boosting power up to 490 hp. Oh, and the optional rear wing was removed.
Lamborghini Countach 5000 QV specs
| Price in US | $118,000 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1490-1587 kg (3285-3499 lbs) |
| Introduced | 1985 |
| Origin country | Italy |
| Views | 28.4k |
Lap times
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Grand Tour Eboladrome | 1:31.80 w |
| Hockenheim Short | 1:20.10 |
| Tsukuba | 1:06.10 est |
| Monza | 2:13.00 est |
| Barcelona Catalunya MotoGP (pre 2018) | 2:08.10 est |
Performance
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.8 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 13.0 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 17.0 s |
| 1000 m | 24.1 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.2 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 10.4 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.1 s @ 93.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.9 s @ 110.0 mph |
| Top speed | 298 kph (185 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.65 g (6 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | V12, n/a |
| Displacement | 5.2 l (315 ci / 5167 cc) |
| Power | 455 ps (449 bhp / 335 kw) |
| Torque | 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 88 ps (87 hp) |
| Power / weight | 299 ps (295 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 329 Nm (242 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 5 manual |
| Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
Countach 5000 QV competition
aaayy 2y ago
BR2+ 7y ago
Its an okay car, Wasnt really huge on it when it was released or know, But ive always loves the sound it made, Specially with a nice aftemarket exhaust., Ive herd the interior, once your settled into it, Is nice n snug, Almost like a somewhat tight bed, Atleast from a few of my older teachers.
But given the era, Id rather have a 288 GTO, YellowBird and a few others.
FastestLaps 7y ago
Awesome walkthrough:
It also shows a photo of a magazine test where this car achieved much better acceleration times than are shown here.
