Image of Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4

Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1544 kg (3404 lbs)
Dimensions 4.46 m (176 in) long, 2.24 m (88 in) wide, 1.17 m (46 in) high
Wheelbase 2.62 m (103 in)
Introduced 2014
Origin country Italy
Gas mileage 16.6-6.5 l/100 km (14-36 mpg US / 17-43 mpg UK)
Views 154.7k

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 40 mph1.5 s
0 - 60 mph2.5 s
0 - 70 mph3.1 s
0 - 80 mph3.9 s
0 - 90 mph4.7 s
0 - 100 mph5.7 s
0 - 110 mph6.8 s
0 - 120 mph8.1 s
0 - 130 mph9.5 s
0 - 140 mph11.2 s
0 - 150 mph13.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.2 s @ 110.6 mph
1/4 mile10.4 s @ 135.5 mph
Est. 1/2 mile17.5 s @ 163.4 mph

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.0 s
0 - 50 kph1.1 s
0 - 60 kph1.5 s
0 - 70 kph1.8 s
0 - 80 kph2.0 s
0 - 90 kph2.4 s
0 - 100 kph2.8 s
0 - 120 kph3.6 s
0 - 130 kph3.9 s
0 - 140 kph4.6 s
0 - 150 kph5.1 s
0 - 160 kph5.8 s
0 - 180 kph6.4 s
0 - 200 kph9.0 s
0 - 250 kph15.3 s
0 - 300 kph27.6 s
1000 m19.1 s @ 275.0 kph
60 - 100 kph (4)3.0 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph1.9 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph6.4 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph18.4 s
Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed328 kph (204 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 010.2 s @ 745 ft
Est. max acceleration1.11 g (11 m/s²)
18m slalom72.8 kph (45.2 mph)
36m slalom142.0 kph (88.2 mph)
Est. emissions187 g/km
Lateral acceleration1.02 g (10 m/s²)
Noise @ 130 kph75 dB
Noise @ 160 kph79 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type V10 40 valve DOHC, direct injection
Displacement 5.2 l (318 ci / 5204 cc)
Power 610 ps (602 bhp / 449 kw) @ 8250 rpm
Torque 560 Nm (413 lb-ft) @ 6500 rpm
Power / liter 117 ps (116 hp)
Power / weight 395 ps (390 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 363 Nm (268 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 46 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 speed automatic
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Braking distance

100 kph - 030 m (100 ft)
120 kph - 045 m (147 ft)
140 kph - 062 m (205 ft)
180 kph - 0101 m (332 ft)
200 kph - 0123 m (403 ft)
60 mph - 032 m (104 ft)
70 mph - 044 m (144 ft)
User avatar

User avatar

Cauf40f50  12h ago

I believe the 10.4 1/4 mile is with rollout


User avatar

AzaanPD  1w ago

It's almost funny how flawed acceleration figures are here
0-60 mph in 2.5s, 0-100 mph in 5.7s and 1/4 mile in 10.4s@135.5mph? When dragtimes Huracan did the 10.4s 1/4 run, it did 0-60 mph in 2.57s, 0-100 mph in 5.89s and 1/4 mile in 10.44s@131.8 mph on DRAG STRIP

 

User avatar

Cauf40f50  11h ago

Did drag times used rollout


User avatar

SpeedKing  10h ago @Cauf40f50

All the major murican testers use roll-out including dragtimes...


User avatar

AzaanPD  1w ago

https://youtu.be/_3aqZ7aZUjw
11:35 has more acurrate acceleration figures for 0-60 mph, 0-100 mph, 1/4 and 0-150 mph
0-60 mph in 2.8s
0-100 mph in 6.1s
1/4 mile in 10.64s@133.9 mph
0-150 mph in 13.8s (0-100 mph was 6.1s and 100-150 mph was 7.7s which means 13.8s for 0-150 mph)


User avatar

Braziliancarguy  2w ago

The r8 is THE SAME CAR

 

I dont know who won here but my bet is in the huracan

 

User avatar

Lambolover  2w ago

No they are not
Huracan is 50kgs lighter and that makes it quicker on both dragrace and laptimes

 

 

 

Website's comparison also shows Huracan as the faster car
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/skcpa03of1ef


User avatar

Cauf40f50  2w ago @Lambolover

I'd still take the r8 being cheaper and more daily drivable


User avatar

Lambolover  2w ago @Cauf40f50

They are the same car except R8 is slower


User avatar

SpeedKing  2w ago @Lambolover

The biggest difference is appearance and the Lambo wins that contest by a country mile...


User avatar

Braziliancarguy  2w ago @Lambolover

Except that the lambo is way worse in daily situscions


User avatar

Cocobe  2w ago @Lambolover

And much much cheaper.


User avatar

Hans  2w ago @Lambolover

R8 performance parts is not slower. But there was only 44 cars, so very limited and it was not cheaper than Performante.


User avatar

Braziliancarguy  2w ago @Cocobe

And softer


User avatar

Reyespaul  2w ago @Cauf40f50

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Reyespaul  2w ago @Braziliancarguy

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Reyespaul  2w ago @Cocobe

So? If you only prefer a car because its cheaper that means you are broke, and if you are broke you are just a piece of irrelevant **** that only deserves to be ******* to ***** and then burn in hell with the devil


User avatar

Reyespaul  2w ago @Cauf40f50

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

FastestLaps  2w ago @Reyespaul

Honestly, shut up.


User avatar

Cocobe  2w ago @Reyespaul

Yes because speed is the ONLY thing about driver experience haha...

Is that why rich as fifth petrolheads like Jeremy Clarkson drives a GTI, while Hammond and May only drive the 911 C2S, when they could easily afford at least the fastest version of their respective cars?

To drive, I wouldn’t doubt the Huracan is a better drive, since VW made it that way. But I would feel so ashamed to pull up in one. Not everyone wants to be seen in a “look at me” car. If you had any maturity, you might understand this some day


User avatar

Braziliancarguy  2w ago @Reyespaul

Says the guy that probably has a fiat uno


User avatar

dante  2w ago @FastestLaps

the commie party is present as usual lol


User avatar

Cauf40f50  2w ago

Basically a more expensive and less reliable r8 :P



User avatar

benedekpuskas  3m ago

224 cm wide? I don't know...


User avatar

vindiesel  6m ago

I don't think we have a good record. in specs
If we do it again, we'll have 7 minutes and 10 seconds.


User avatar

Lambo lover  6m ago

https://youtu.be/O6vMOWKWfks
Huracan did a 10.350 at 131.27
On minute 6:05 of the video

 

User avatar

SpeedKing  6m ago

Yep optimum conditions, sticky track, cool air hence DA below sea level. In addition no wheel spin on that pass therefore 0-60 ft of 1.53 sec which is the quickest ever for a stock Huracan. The 0-60 mph time would have been 2.39 which is not possible on asphalt due to certain wheelspin. Details matter although i doubt whether they'll be given any credibility on this site lol


User avatar

dr. cosimo  6m ago @SpeedKing

no mag test, not legit lol

only if butthead was behind the wheel, then they would reconsider.


User avatar

SpeedKing  6m ago @dr. cosimo

The crazy thing is that the time slip is legit which is backed up by the electronic timing board which is visible on the video. On top of that he uses VBox(industry standard) and or Dragy. But the Supreme Leader gives it no credibility because mags never lie no do they ever get it wrong. Talk about blind faith bordering on stupidity lol


User avatar

dr. cosimo  6m ago @SpeedKing

perhaps we should start getting russian glasses, i hear they show you behind the scenes tests with far more better results

3cugeirt6jj7.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

SpeedKing  6m ago @dr. cosimo

Ha and here i was thinking that they were being one-eyed. I need to get me those quality Russian glasses lol


User avatar

OutCast10  3m ago

Not in real life conditions.


User avatar

AzaanPD  1w ago

On a near perfect track with perfect conditions and DA below sea level. On normal asphalt, that same Huracan did 10.6s@133.9 mph


User avatar

Freakz  1y ago

Huracan vs SVJ 1/4 Mile:

 


User avatar

saxy  2y ago

43mpg fuel economy? That’s not right lol


User avatar

BR2+  2y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  3y ago

FastestLaps, fakekillerfour, DeDe or somebody!
What do you think that the Huracan did 0-200 km/h in 8 seconds at Automobilismo's test?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/21694989992/
It's the same test when it did 0-180 in 6.4 s.


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  3y ago

Do you think it's possible that this car can do 0-200 km/h in 7.9 - 8.0 seconds?
Automobilismo (Italian car magazine) has measured 7.942 s for 0-200 km/h time:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/21694989992/


User avatar

SRT  3y ago

0-100 kph - 2.6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp_p77L4QOo&t=39s


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

 


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

Amazing laptime at nurburgring GP 3.7km track


User avatar

Dinero  4y ago

Lamborghini Huracan performante is on top with 6:52.01, is that evidence good enough? Great job Lamborghini, this is a beginning of a new era!!


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/news/a32414/lamborghini-huracan-performante-nurburgring-lap/
Lamborghini Huracan Performante will beat the Aventador SV at the 'Ring


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

Why even bother posting that article?..


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

lol I'll believe when I see actual evidence


User avatar

Murmur  4y ago

Lamborghini Huracan Performante faster than both Aventador SV and Porsche 918 Spyder on the Ring:

http://www.quattroruote.it/news/novita/2017/01/25/lamborghini_huracan_performante_piu_veloce_dell_aventador_sv_al_nurburgring.html




User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

Change curb weight of Huracan LP610-4 to 1544kg.
AutoBild
http://www.germancarforum.com/threads/lamborghini-huracan-lp610-4.50012/page-11#post-707266


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-lamborghini-huracan-lp610-4-tested-review
Change curb weight of Huracan LP610-4 to 3423 Ibs 1553 kg.
1422 kg is the dry weight listed by lamborghini.


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

roll race: 997 gt2 rs vs huracan lp610-4

 


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

McLaren 650S vs Huracan LP610-4

 


User avatar

cosimo  4y ago

550x800m


User avatar

tharne  4y ago

Here cosimo another one for you :P
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GZtTRKuE8A