Image of Lamborghini LM002

Lamborghini LM002 specs

Car type SUV/truck
Curb weight 3045 kg (6713 lbs)
Introduced 1985
Origin country Italy
Views 14.8k

Performance

0 - 100 kph8.5 s
1000 m31.2 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph8.3 s
0 - 100 mph25.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile11.6 s @ 73.3 mph
Est. 1/4 mile17.7 s @ 88.9 mph
Top speed201 kph (125 mph)
Lamborghini LM002 acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V12
Displacement 5.2 l (315 ci / 5167 cc)
Power 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) @ 4500 rpm
Power / liter 81 ps (80 hp)
Power / weight 138 ps (136 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 164 Nm (121 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 5-Speed
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

More Lamborghini cars 117

User avatar
User avatar

aaayy  1y ago

Screw the Urus, this is the only Lamborghini SUV that I’d own.


User avatar

aaayy   2y ago

Supposedly they offered Lambo's L804 7.2 liter marine V12 for boats in this thing, but I can't find any pictures or articles stating that this ever happened.

P.S, if I owned one of these monsters, I would engine swap it for a Murcielago V12. Why? Because since the Murci's engine is on the same basic design of all Lambo V12's dating back to the Countach, that engine is comparable with this thing. But it's not like this thing needs 640 horsepower. It already gets 5 miles per gallon.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  2y ago

Better than Urus :-D


User avatar

Zain  2y ago

0-100 is 7,8 sec


User avatar

Shaggy  8y ago

I like it, the first SUV with a V12 engine, the engine is from a Countach.


User avatar

Fangio Man  8y ago

Size: 4900 mm long, 2000 mm wide, 1850 mm heigh
Wheelbase: 3000 mm
Front/Rear track: 1615/1615 mm
Distribution: 50:50
Compr.: 9.5:1
Fuel capacity: 290 liters


User avatar

monkeypop  9y ago

@affalterbacher

370ft-lb isnt much torque for a 6,700 pound 4x4. Not to mention that the torque in a 4x4 is best suited for lower RPM.. which I doubt this engine provides.


User avatar

affalterbacher  9y ago

@monkeypop

It has 500Nm and that's enough!


User avatar

monkeypop  9y ago

Are those steel wheels?

Seems all wrong for a 4x4 off roader. Usually torque is higher than bhp in off road vehicles.

Not sure how a high revving V12 would do crawling over boulders at low RPM.


User avatar

Mental  9y ago

It may seem quite strange, but, as for me, this car isn't ugly. It's an off-road muscle car by Lambo... with house proportions, but it doesn't matter me. If you don't like the bonnet, in 1990 Lambo had introduced it without these air intakes.


User avatar

sam11855  11y ago

I think the army will need some, don't know why but they just do


User avatar

phavyarden  12y ago

Hell it's ugly:O


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

Displacement is 5167 ccm!

Photo of Lamborghini LM002

Photo of Lamborghini LM002

Photo of Lamborghini LM002

Photo of Lamborghini LM002