Lamborghini Murcielago specs

Rate these performance stats on a scale of 1-10!

Lamborghini Murciélago
Claimed Power: 571 hp @ 7500 rpm
Claimed Torque: 479 lb-ft @ 5400 rpm
Bore x Stroke: 87 mm x 86.8 mm
Number of Cylinders: 12
Boost Pressure: naturally aspirated
BMEP d: 12.0 bar
VE un-boost: 100.00%
VE boost: 100.00%
MPS @ Peak Power: 22 m/s
Actual Power: 631 hp @ 7600 rpm
Actual Torque: 480 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm
Drivetrain: RWD; 6MT/6AMT
Estimated Weight: 3931 lb
0-60 MPH: 3.6 sec
0-100 MPH: 8.5 sec
0-150 MPH: 18.6 sec
0-200 MPH: 40.0 sec
1/4-Mile (street): 12.1 sec @ 123 mph
1/4-Mile (drag): 10.8 sec @ 125 mph
Top Speed: 212 mph
Motor Trend Figure-8: 25.5 sec @ 0.97 G
Nürburgring Nordschleife: 7:48
Top Gear Test Track (Power Lap): 1:26

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rEMoz9pDnZc6kE1VCkP8UWvXEJWCeRqwsxhTD4xIyh8/edit?usp=sharing

How I got the lap time estimates

Figure-8: (((((((900/(30/22)x(1858x2.20462262))/0.09)/631))/0.5)/1.21)x1)x0.65x0.5

Nordschleife: ((20600m/(300km/h/((365m)x0.3048m))x(1858kg/631hp)/1.21g)x0.0095x0.55

Power Lap: ((3931lb+75kg)/631hp)x((1.75mi)x12)x1.21x0.65/1.21

The main picture looks super underwhelming

Can you just delete it and change it with one of the other pics below?

Same weight as an S class from that time, but faster than everything else in its price range. Faster than an F40 and 959 even! It's truly a timeless classic

Price when new: 226.200 €

https://www.autobild.de/marken-modelle/lamborghini/murcielago/1/#daten

This is what the Murcielago was originally supposed to be. Enter the Canto, designed by Zagato, a successor to the Diablo that was never put into production.

It had 640 horsepower, RWD, a 6-speed manual, and a 217 mph top speed.

Tsukuba laptime at 48:50:
1:04.76
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkYyBCFojAw

1.Miura
2.Murcielago
3.Aventador
4.Countach
5.Diablo

How do you think, which V12 mid-engined Lambo from Miura to Aventador is the best looking?
My rating is:
1) Countach
2) Diablo
3) Aventador
4) Miura
5) Murcielago

Weird how little comments this car got in all these years here.

0-60 mph: 3.8
0-100 mph: 8.4
1/4 mile: 11.86 @ 122 mph

Source: TorqueStats (since right now) - http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_times&drive=4WD&bhp=572&weight=1650&submit=Calculate

I Added a New Photo.

@Classics Dreamin Vimulator is Not a Reliable Source.

The Best Rivals For This Car : Porsche 996 GT2,Ferrari F50.

I Believe all The Acceleration Numbers are Correct.

The LP580 is a nice car but, IMO, the LP640 looks a bit better.

@troll
vimulator isn't source

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Magnificent car, named for a fighting bull that refused to die.

Lamborghini Murcielago Best 0-100 mph in 7.8 Secs.

Source : Zepefrs

Lamborghini Murcielago Top Speed 331 Km/h Source : Zeperfs

1/4 mile is 12.0 Secs From Zeperfs

bye bye lambo

love this car alot

the lamborghini murcielago is smooth and looks good and is expensive but when you think about its only quick on striaght lines mon the acceleration is not all that great ether you know and it wieghs 3960lbs!!!!! that is wiegh to heavy it recrded 3.8secs to 60mph at nardo and it only ran up to 203mph at nardo theres another problem with it just wont corner very well i mean at the nurburgring it recorded 7.50sec disapointing hey ford gt and corvette z06 both went round the nurburgring in 7.42 the porsche 911 turbo went round the nurburgring in 7.40 from what i heard the lambo murcielago has 580hp but its still abit slow compared to them porschs the lambo would nt stand a chance against the zonda f and i love the zonda f she has 602 hp and would whup the lambo the zonda f clubsport did 7.24 round the nurburgring and another car i love that would kik dust in the face of this car blew me away the corvette zr1 with 638 bhp the corvette zr1 went round the nurburgring in 7.26

sorry the sportauto wet handling time was for the LP640 please delet this

also in the Roadster version press release they have a 0-200 @ 11.4 sec. and 0-300 @ 34.2 and considering the coupe is listed faster than the vert's 3.8 sec. I'd say it's fair to use the vert's times on this page to save space on creating a page just for the vert which likely won't get much track time from mags/owners...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamborghini_Murci%C3%A9lago#_note-3

Quarter Mile: 11.7 sec. http://www.motortrend.com/features/scenes/112_0306_spdtest/photo_03.html

You are right. Entry changed.