Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV specs

In my opinion this was the last real Lambo. New Lambos have a practical engine with an emphasis on handling well and being at least somewhat practical. The new Lambos are setting lap records on the Nurburgring, which just proves that he German's are destroying the old Lambo charm. They're making them faster, sure, and they saved the company from ruin, but they removed their charm in the process. The Murcielago was basically a 570 horsepower Diablo when it first came out in 2002. The eventually upgraded it with the 640, and although it made the Murcie more sedate (watch Top Gear's review of it), they corrected that cars errors with the SV. It might be designed to handle better than a standard Murcie (or any old lambo for that matter), but it's 7:42 on the Nurburgring doesn't help it,s cause when many other cars at the time were much faster than this. But it is good at one thing: Being a Lamborghini. It's got no rear vision whatsoever, a massive spoiler that actually slows down the car (213 with the smaller spoiler, 208 with the big one), show-off doors, way too much power for it's own good (670 isn't much today but it was insane 10 years ago and trust me, it feels like more in a Lamborghini), and of course that classic Lamborghini charm of being uncomfortable, having a hot cabin and no radio with optional A/C delete. It's also the last real Lambo in the way that it's still using the Countach or Diablo's V12, just producing more power. In my opinion it sounds much better than the current Lambos.

0-120 kph: 4.3 s
0-140: 5.3 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8878777289/

I guess that murcielago is the best car in my idea .[img][/img]

I Think This Car Rivals The Ferrari 599 GTO and Porsche 997 Turbo S PDK.

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Well!it is faster than the pagani zonda and ferrari enjo on a racing track :-)

@Eryk03

Mores stuff for the Lambo SV.

Source:

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/einzeltests/lamborghini-murcielago-super-veloce-lp-670-4-sv-im-test-1373437.html?show=4

That standing mile estimate is REALLY REALLY GOOD.
.youtube.com/watch?v=a2UV7CDcxw8&feature=plcp

I think with a perfect launch and perfect shifts it a 27 second car.

RWD Aventador? Yeah, it would be then much lighter, and I guess would be even more fun to drive! :D

I think this is still my favourite car. What a masterpiece. It is just perfect. I just wish they also made a rear wheel drive version like they have for the Gallardo.

there were i live are over 20 units of this car.

Slower than their own lp640 ...

0-100km/h 2.9 seconds.

http://carbuzz.com/news/2012/4/30/Hear-the-Lamborghini-Murcielago-SV-Roar-with-Launch-Control-7708585/

the best car ever built..

the most beautiful car ever build...

Thanks Smugolo (:

@Mike B

Search for the 3.0s and 9.9s times in AUTO ZEITUNG 18/2009.

http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98311_4_122_77lo.jpg

I found it, the test from Automobilismo, 0-1000m in 19.7 @ 268.1km/h

On Nring? no, it's not a false time, is a manufacturer laptime

The 7:42 for this was a one lap attempt and the stock suspension settings are not suited for bumpy tracks like the Nring (the LP570 has suffered the same fate at Nring tests)
A properly set up SV driven by the factory will probably do around 7:25.

how come its so slow on lap times. its strange its slower than a camaro...... probably false lap times on the camaro

http://www.auto.it/prove/lamborghini/murcielago/2009/12-3802/scheda/Lamborghini+Murci%C3%A8lago+SV%3A+0-100+in+3%22

Edit: the trapspeed of the 0-1km is not 267km/h ... it is either 268 or 269, I'm gonna search for it

On the SV vs GT-R test? it can't be, they got 3.2 and 10.8 mmm

@Mike B It's AutoBild Sportscars 11/2009

I'll like to know the source of the 0-100km/h and 0-200km/h

This car is about more than just speed.
Much more.

too bad for 500K it's still slower than a 100K ZR1. pity.

very good car

the nurburgring time is bullshit!

soz i ment #2