Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV specs

0-120 kph: 4.3 s
0-140: 5.3 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8878777289/

I guess that murcielago is the best car in my idea .[img][/img]

I Think This Car Rivals The Ferrari 599 GTO and Porsche 997 Turbo S PDK.

Quarter mile time? 10.9? Hmmm that's slow!

Well!it is faster than the pagani zonda and ferrari enjo on a racing track :-)

@Eryk03

Mores stuff for the Lambo SV.

Source:

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/einzeltests/lamborghini-murcielago-super-veloce-lp-670-4-sv-im-test-1373437.html?show=4

That standing mile estimate is REALLY REALLY GOOD.
.youtube.com/watch?v=a2UV7CDcxw8&feature=plcp

I think with a perfect launch and perfect shifts it a 27 second car.

RWD Aventador? Yeah, it would be then much lighter, and I guess would be even more fun to drive! :D

I think this is still my favourite car. What a masterpiece. It is just perfect. I just wish they also made a rear wheel drive version like they have for the Gallardo.

there were i live are over 20 units of this car.

Slower than their own lp640 ...

0-100km/h 2.9 seconds.

http://carbuzz.com/news/2012/4/30/Hear-the-Lamborghini-Murcielago-SV-Roar-with-Launch-Control-7708585/

the best car ever built..

the most beautiful car ever build...

Thanks Smugolo (:

@Mike B

Search for the 3.0s and 9.9s times in AUTO ZEITUNG 18/2009.

http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98311_4_122_77lo.jpg

I found it, the test from Automobilismo, 0-1000m in 19.7 @ 268.1km/h

On Nring? no, it's not a false time, is a manufacturer laptime

The 7:42 for this was a one lap attempt and the stock suspension settings are not suited for bumpy tracks like the Nring (the LP570 has suffered the same fate at Nring tests)
A properly set up SV driven by the factory will probably do around 7:25.

how come its so slow on lap times. its strange its slower than a camaro...... probably false lap times on the camaro

http://www.auto.it/prove/lamborghini/murcielago/2009/12-3802/scheda/Lamborghini+Murci%C3%A8lago+SV%3A+0-100+in+3%22

Edit: the trapspeed of the 0-1km is not 267km/h ... it is either 268 or 269, I'm gonna search for it

On the SV vs GT-R test? it can't be, they got 3.2 and 10.8 mmm

@Mike B It's AutoBild Sportscars 11/2009

I'll like to know the source of the 0-100km/h and 0-200km/h

This car is about more than just speed.
Much more.

too bad for 500K it's still slower than a 100K ZR1. pity.

very good car

the nurburgring time is bullshit!

soz i ment #2

Igor.... yes we have that 0-60 time already