Man, this car is HOT. And I'm more of a Diablo guy. Kinda unfortunate this is the last V12 Lambo with a manual transmission.
Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV specs
| Price in Europe | €357,000 - €357,683 |
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1565-1764 kg (3450-3889 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.71 m (185 in) long, 2.06 m (81 in) wide, 1.14 m (45 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.67 m (105 in) |
| Introduced | 2009 |
| Origin country | Italy |
| Gas mileage | 36.3-18.1 l/100 km (6-13 mpg US / 8-16 mpg UK) |
| Views | 136.9k |
| Submitted by | Chiesi |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.2 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 2.6 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 2.8 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 5.0 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 5.8 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 6.8 s |
| 0 - 110 mph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 9.6 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 11.5 s |
| 0 - 140 mph | 13.2 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 15.4 s |
| 0 - 160 mph | 18.2 s |
| 0 - 170 mph | 21.2 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 7.4 s @ 108.1 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 10.9 s |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 17.9 s @ 160.3 mph |
| Est. 1 mile | 28.5 s @ 184.5 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.2 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 1.9 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 4.3 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 4.8 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 5.3 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 7.0 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 300 kph | 29.7 s |
| 1000 m | 19.7 s @ 268.0 kph |
General performance
| Top speed | 342 kph (213 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 12.0 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 1.03 g (10 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 70.1 kph (43.6 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 136.0 kph (84.5 mph) |
| Downforce @ 200 kph | 112 kg (247 lbs) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | V12 |
| Displacement | 6.5 l (397 ci) |
| Power | 670 ps (661 bhp / 493 kw) @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque | 660 Nm (487 lb-ft) @ 6500 rpm |
| Power / liter | 103 ps (102 hp) |
| Power / weight | 403 ps (397 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 397 Nm (293 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 25 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 9 ps |
| Transmission | 6speed manual or 6 speed sequential |
| Layout | middle engine, all wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 100 kph - 0 | 33 m (110 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 127 m (418 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 30 m (98 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 87 m (287 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.2 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 8.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 10.7 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 12.9 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 6.9 s |
| Est. 200 - 300 kph | 19.8 s |
Murcielago LP 670-4 SV competition
aaayy 3y ago
In my opinion this was the last real Lambo. New Lambos have a practical engine with an emphasis on handling well and being at least somewhat practical. The new Lambos are setting lap records on the Nurburgring, which just proves that he German's are destroying the old Lambo charm. They're making them faster, sure, and they saved the company from ruin, but they removed their charm in the process. The Murcielago was basically a 570 horsepower Diablo when it first came out in 2002. The eventually upgraded it with the 640, and although it made the Murcie more sedate (watch Top Gear's review of it), they corrected that cars errors with the SV. It might be designed to handle better than a standard Murcie (or any old lambo for that matter), but it's 7:42 on the Nurburgring doesn't help it,s cause when many other cars at the time were much faster than this. But it is good at one thing: Being a Lamborghini. It's got no rear vision whatsoever, a massive spoiler that actually slows down the car (213 with the smaller spoiler, 208 with the big one), show-off doors, way too much power for it's own good (670 isn't much today but it was insane 10 years ago and trust me, it feels like more in a Lamborghini), and of course that classic Lamborghini charm of being uncomfortable, having a hot cabin and no radio with optional A/C delete. It's also the last real Lambo in the way that it's still using the Countach or Diablo's V12, just producing more power. In my opinion it sounds much better than the current Lambos.
Inline 6 rules 6y ago
0-120 kph: 4.3 s
0-140: 5.3 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/8878777289/
Julle85 11y ago
@Eryk03
Mores stuff for the Lambo SV.
Source:
Dave 11y ago
That standing mile estimate is REALLY REALLY GOOD.
.youtube.com/watch?v=a2UV7CDcxw8&feature=plcp
I think with a perfect launch and perfect shifts it a 27 second car.
Julle85 12y ago
0-100km/h 2.9 seconds.
Mike B 12y ago
http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98311_4_122_77lo.jpg
I found it, the test from Automobilismo, 0-1000m in 19.7 @ 268.1km/h
Mike B 12y ago
On Nring? no, it's not a false time, is a manufacturer laptime
The 7:42 for this was a one lap attempt and the stock suspension settings are not suited for bumpy tracks like the Nring (the LP570 has suffered the same fate at Nring tests)
A properly set up SV driven by the factory will probably do around 7:25.
gallardo man 12y ago
how come its so slow on lap times. its strange its slower than a camaro...... probably false lap times on the camaro
Mike B 12y ago
Edit: the trapspeed of the 0-1km is not 267km/h ... it is either 268 or 269, I'm gonna search for it
