Image of Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV

Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1664 kg (3668 lbs)
Dimensions 4.71 m (185 in) long, 2.06 m (81 in) wide, 1.14 m (45 in) high
Wheelbase 2.67 m (105 in)
Introduced 2009
Origin country Italy
Views 133.2k
Submitted by Chiesi

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.2 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.9 s
0 - 80 kph2.0 s
0 - 100 kph3.0 s
0 - 130 kph4.8 s
0 - 180 kph8.0 s
0 - 200 kph9.9 s
0 - 300 kph29.7 s
1000 m19.7 s @ 268.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph6.9 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph19.8 s
0 - 60 mph2.8 s
0 - 100 mph6.8 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.4 s @ 108.1 mph
1/4 mile10.9 s
Est. 1/2 mile17.9 s @ 160.3 mph
Est. 1 mile28.5 s @ 184.5 mph
Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed342 kph (213 mph)
0 - 100 mph - 012.0 s
Est. max acceleration1.03 g (10 m/s²)
18m slalom70.1 kph (43.6 mph)
36m slalom136.0 kph (84.5 mph)
100 kph - 033 m (110 ft)
200 kph - 0127 m (418 ft)
60 mph - 030 m (98 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V12
Displacement 6.5 l (397 ci)
Power 670 ps (661 bhp / 493 kw) @ 6500 rpm
Torque 660 Nm (487 lb-ft) @ 6500 rpm
Power / liter 103 ps (102 hp)
Power / weight 403 ps (397 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 397 Nm (293 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6speed manual or 6 speed sequential
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

aaayy   1y ago

In my opinion this was the last real Lambo. New Lambos have a practical engine with an emphasis on handling well and being at least somewhat practical. The new Lambos are setting lap records on the Nurburgring, which just proves that he German's are destroying the old Lambo charm. They're making them faster, sure, and they saved the company from ruin, but they removed their charm in the process. The Murcielago was basically a 570 horsepower Diablo when it first came out in 2002. The eventually upgraded it with the 640, and although it made the Murcie more sedate (watch Top Gear's review of it), they corrected that cars errors with the SV. It might be designed to handle better than a standard Murcie (or any old lambo for that matter), but it's 7:42 on the Nurburgring doesn't help it,s cause when many other cars at the time were much faster than this. But it is good at one thing: Being a Lamborghini. It's got no rear vision whatsoever, a massive spoiler that actually slows down the car (213 with the smaller spoiler, 208 with the big one), show-off doors, way too much power for it's own good (670 isn't much today but it was insane 10 years ago and trust me, it feels like more in a Lamborghini), and of course that classic Lamborghini charm of being uncomfortable, having a hot cabin and no radio with optional A/C delete. It's also the last real Lambo in the way that it's still using the Countach or Diablo's V12, just producing more power. In my opinion it sounds much better than the current Lambos.



User avatar

hr  8y ago

I guess that murcielago is the best car in my idea .[img][/img]


User avatar

Karthick01  8y ago

I Think This Car Rivals The Ferrari 599 GTO and Porsche 997 Turbo S PDK.


User avatar

S  8y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

Aquib  8y ago

Well!it is faster than the pagani zonda and ferrari enjo on a racing track :-)



User avatar

Dave  9y ago

That standing mile estimate is REALLY REALLY GOOD.
.youtube.com/watch?v=a2UV7CDcxw8&feature=plcp

I think with a perfect launch and perfect shifts it a 27 second car.


User avatar

Mental  9y ago

RWD Aventador? Yeah, it would be then much lighter, and I guess would be even more fun to drive! :D


User avatar

lamboboy  9y ago

I think this is still my favourite car. What a masterpiece. It is just perfect. I just wish they also made a rear wheel drive version like they have for the Gallardo.


User avatar

Ferrari driver  9y ago

there were i live are over 20 units of this car.


User avatar

soybeanmilk  9y ago

Slower than their own lp640 ...



User avatar

....  9y ago

the best car ever built..


User avatar

2mase4u  10y ago

the most beautiful car ever build...


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

Thanks Smugolo (:


User avatar

Smugolo  10y ago

@Mike B

Search for the 3.0s and 9.9s times in AUTO ZEITUNG 18/2009.


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

http://img144.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98311_4_122_77lo.jpg

I found it, the test from Automobilismo, 0-1000m in 19.7 @ 268.1km/h


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

On Nring? no, it's not a false time, is a manufacturer laptime

The 7:42 for this was a one lap attempt and the stock suspension settings are not suited for bumpy tracks like the Nring (the LP570 has suffered the same fate at Nring tests)
A properly set up SV driven by the factory will probably do around 7:25.


User avatar

gallardo man  10y ago

how come its so slow on lap times. its strange its slower than a camaro...... probably false lap times on the camaro


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

http://www.auto.it/prove/lamborghini/murcielago/2009/12-3802/scheda/Lamborghini+Murci%C3%A8lago+SV%3A+0-100+in+3%22

Edit: the trapspeed of the 0-1km is not 267km/h ... it is either 268 or 269, I'm gonna search for it


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

On the SV vs GT-R test? it can't be, they got 3.2 and 10.8 mmm


User avatar

FastestLaps  10y ago

@Mike B It's AutoBild Sportscars 11/2009


User avatar

Mike B  10y ago

I'll like to know the source of the 0-100km/h and 0-200km/h


User avatar

Apathy  10y ago

This car is about more than just speed.
Much more.


User avatar

Sal30  10y ago

too bad for 500K it's still slower than a 100K ZR1. pity.


User avatar

gallardo man  10y ago

very good car


User avatar

lamboboy  10y ago

the nurburgring time is bullshit!


User avatar

sam11855  10y ago

soz i ment #2


User avatar

sam11855  10y ago

best lambo