Lamborghini Temerario specs

Dayum

Post under review. Will be published by moderator shortly.

https://youtu.be/XK71VeXOJ3I?si=Fe_pPodL6KyRH4g5
Update the acceleration number & 1/4 for this car @Lambolover
It did 9.58 at 148.5 mph
It's the normal temerario not the track pack (agglirita)

First straight piped temerario

Wheras they used to make brilliant cars like the Murcielago and the Gallardo, now... we have whatever this is

Lamborghini for Life.

I am a bit sad that the cheapest Lambo (at least the real ones), are gonna cost half a million. However, that makes some 2nd hand Huracans seem like a bargain. Nobody will find the Huracan not "fast" enough.

Super Flop

Weight is same as the reve, which makes no sense.

Baby Lambo always was 200-300 kg lighter.

Are they using heavy machinery industrial parts for construction work? If this is how heavy it will be as a first attempt, I expect their future cars to pass the two tons mark.

@mods please add
Weight: 4271lbs
0-10mph: 0.39s
0-20mph: 0.82s
0-30mph: 1.20s
0-40mph: 1.58s
0-50mph: 2.00s
0-60mph (1ft rollout): 2.27s
0-60mph: 2.44s

When is the facelift coming? This don’t look good as the old model.

For the people calling this "disappointing"

ooof, 1905kg or almost 4200lb.

Thing is hideous af!!

i saw 1 today better looking irl in giallo (idk which one might be Inti), still prefer the huracan tho.

Waste of money for a fake bull that can scuttle like a tired pig.

Seems like we will soon finally get the first lap time for it. But with an as-tested-price of 585k $ (!!!) it can almost only look bad against a ZR1 that costs 222k $. Like how did it happen that the entry-level Lamborghini with options costs more than 2.5x as much as a probably superior ZR1?! I was thinking tariffs first but a 992.2 GT3 is at 242k $, the AMG GT63 Pro at 212k $.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/g69917412/2026-performance-car-of-the-year-contender-list/

The weight with a v8 is a big disaster 👎 vs Revuelto with a v12

the problem is that this car carries the same hybrid weight of the Revuelto, but it's purposely detuned the electric motors down significantly, so the power output isn't making it worthwhile of its weight penalty.

If the car was 980hp. it would make a lot more sense

My God
First test from this car and people are already doubting

i thought i was harsh to lambo specially the Revuelto but this might be a failure BIG Time on paper this will underperform but i want them to prove me wrong, the real figures it gives are low , cuz it relies too much on EV HP but not in a way the AMG ONE does.
Quite underwhelming tbh atleast i expect proper factory calibration if they mess up this one too daaam , more software updates......

If they do a closed session Nurburgring lap time they are being watched highly even in a greater microscope after the STO cheating attempt too, it's not looking good in many ends.

Underperformer final boss

All that power, and it's still not faster than a 7 year old Mclaren 720S. Kinda disappointing

@FastestLaps please remove the dry weight of 1690 kg from the curb weight range.

Autocar Road Test: Lamborghini Temerario

Weight (with fluids): 1905 kg

It looks better than a regular Huracan, but worse than Tecnica and Performante. Gallardo also looks better. Twin Turbo V8 sounds worse than V10, but how many such high-revving turbocharged engines are there in production cars? No one! (Ok, Czinger 21C, if you consider it's a production car). So I don't care what anyone thinks, for me, the new V8 is better than the atmo V10. Although the engine could be more powerful, given its ultra-high revs. It would also be nice if the car weighted about 100 kg less. It's clear that Lamborghini didn't want the temerario to be faster than Revuelto.

3,41s 100-200
Definetly faster than the revuelto