Image of Lamborghini Urus

Lamborghini Urus specs

Car type SUV/truck
Curb weight 2200 kg (4850 lbs)
Power / weight 295 ps (291 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 386 Nm (285 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2018
Origin country Italy
Views 6k
Submitted by 777Balt

Performance

Top speed 305 kph (190 mph)
0 - 60 kph 1.5 s
0 - 80 kph 2.4 s
0 - 100 kph 3.2 s
0 - 120 kph 4.3 s
0 - 130 kph 5.0 s
0 - 140 kph 5.8 s
0 - 160 kph 7.4 s
0 - 180 kph 9.4 s
0 - 200 kph 12.0 s
1/4 mile 11.3 s @ 120.8 mph
1000 m 20.9 s @ 246.8 kph
60 kph - 0 11 m (36 ft)
100 kph - 0 31 m (102 ft)
120 kph - 0 46 m (152 ft)
140 kph - 0 63 m (207 ft)
160 kph - 0 83 m (272 ft)
Lamborghini Urus acceleration graph

Powertrain

Engine type V8 Twin Turbo
Displacement 4.0 l (244 ci / 3996 cc)
Power 650 ps (641 bhp / 478 kw) @ 6000 rpm
Torque 850 Nm (627 lb-ft) @ 2250 rpm
Power / liter 163 ps (160 hp)
Transmission 8-speed ZF 8HP automatic
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Laptimes

Track Time
Balocco 2:52.31
Vairano Handling Course 1:16.33
Nürburgring Nordschleife 7:56.00 est
Laguna Seca (post 1988) 1:41.00 est
Hockenheim Short 1:12.00 est
Willow Springs 1:32.00 est
Tsukuba 1:03.00 est
Sachsenring 1:38.00 est
User avatar

User avatar

Luckydaff  3w ago

Who came up with the Ring est.? There is a video of a Black Urus doing 6.47 unofficially during testing with cones on the track. I bet the Urus in perfect conditions would do 7.44 or even less?


User avatar

Hans  2m ago

0-60 mph in 2.9 sec
https://youtu.be/R3NmTkko0Aw


User avatar

FastestLaps  2m ago

Spotted the new Urus on the street for the first time today. Some people over here have fat wallets...

As much as I think crossover SUVs are pointless, I still have to respect something that is as aerodynamic as a brick and weights 2.2 tons, and is faster in 1/4 mile than relatively recent F10 BMW M5.



User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

[2019 Lamborghini Urus] Evo Magazine 7/2018 test results in "Fast Sport-Utes" page:
0-30 mph = 1.5 s
0-40 mph = 2.2 s
0-50 mph = 2.8 s
0-60 mph = 3.8 s
0-70 mph = 4.9 s
0-80 mph = 6.3 s
0-90 mph = 7.8 s
0-100 mph = 9.4 s
0-110 mph = 12.0 s (1/4-mile: 12.3/112)
0-120 mph = 13.8 s
0-130 mph = 15.3 s
0-140 mph = 19.2 s (1000m: 22.6/147)
0-150 mph = 23.6 s

Anglesey Coastal Circuit: 1:15.2


User avatar

777Balt  6m ago

A fcking SUV that beats Ferrari FF, Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0 997, 480hp Nissan GT-R R35 (which was supercar killer when it came out), Ferrari F430, Ferrari fcking Enzo, Porsche Carrera GT, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S and others in Vairano Handling Course. It even beats Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 which has just 10 less metric horsepower and is a proper V12 supercar.


User avatar

General Castilla  7m ago

"First supercar level SUV."

i'm not sure if i can mention a 'uranus' as supercar level. it's a family ski day car and grocery getter in murica.

what you seem to not to understand is, the vw pepper turbo could achieve those speeds without having to spend over 200k, what they're selling to the public now is an upgraded version of the old touareg with more powerful engine sourced out of audi lineup with a lambo badge and six figures....das auto scheisse


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  7m ago

First supercar level SUV.
For me supercar level means as fast as the Porsche 959 in acceleration numbers and has a top speed of 300+ km/h.
With 305 km/h, 0-100 in 3.2 s, 0-160 in 7.4 s and 0-200 in 12 s Lambo Urus is the first SUV to achieve all of that.


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago

The new Ford Explorer RS (a better version of the Explorer ST) will make over 600 hp and top 190 mph. Watch out, Urus and Trackhawk


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago

There is no way the Urus does 0-100 kph in 3.2s. The Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk and the upcoming Ford Explorer RS (no joke, it's going to be released in the next year or two) won't even do that.

 

User avatar

rhs1992  7m ago

haha, You can't compare old Jeep to new Lamborghini.
Even GLC63 and Cayenne Turbo do that in 3.6s


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago @rhs1992

Jeep has 707 hp, 645 lb-ft, 3.5 seconds (0-60 mph), and 180 mph


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago @rhs1992

Thats funny?..Since when is a TrackHawk old? It just came out, There both super suvs with over 600bhp and super fast, Its the Uruss closest performance competitor.


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago

Yet it did do it...Must be mystical..


User avatar

rhs1992  7m ago @BR2+

Jeep is based on 2005 Mercedes ML, but Lambo on 2015 Audi Q7, so platform is much more modern. And knowing germans, that engine, probably, have over 700 horsepower, not 650.
So even with 800hp Trackhawk will be slover. And there is nothing wrong with Jeep - it is much cheaper than Lambo.


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago @rhs1992

Dodge Charger Hellcat is based on a 1996 Mercedes W210 E-Class but it still is the fastest sedan on earth. 0-60 mph in 2.9s on drag radials, 3.7s on stock tires. Top speed governed to 204 mph, unrestricted 217+ mph. 1/4-mile time of 11.0s surpasses likes of Acura NSX and McLaren 570S.

I brought the Hellcat up because it has the same engine and kind of Benz origins as the Trackhawk


User avatar

rhs1992  7m ago @hostboy

Charger Hellcat in magazine tests can only do 11.4s 1/4 mile, and 570s do it in 10s.


User avatar

BR2+  7m ago @hostboy

Where the fk are you getting this shite from?


User avatar

ss com  7m ago @hostboy

Lol the Hellcat is far from the fastest saloon.
Current fastest saloons are the P100D, E63S and M5.


User avatar

Devin Swanson   3w ago @hostboy

I own a Trackhawck and I am getting 3.2 0-60 and did 11.2 in the quarter mile and that's facts...


User avatar

hostboy  3w ago @Devin Swanson

You cannot do 11.2 in a stock Trackhawk, you must have modified it


User avatar

hostboy  3w ago @Devin Swanson

Jeep claims 11.6 and a Trackhawk isn't doing 11.2 on stock tires or in stock form even on drag radials. FCA is known for LIBERAL claims. A Hellcat Charger is having a hard time doing 11.0 and a Hellcat Challenger is having a hard time doing 11.2 even after all these years of liberalized claims. A magazine's best is 11.4 for the Charger and 11.7 for the Challenger. I think even the Redeye will do 11.5. A Trackhawk is slower than any Hellcat after 60-70. If a Trackhawk is doing 11.2, then a Hellcat must be doing 10.6-10.8


User avatar

BR2+  3w ago @hostboy

That just sounds stupid, You most certainly can, Its not unheard of to shave .4s off a 1/4 time at a strip.


User avatar

Hans  2w ago @hostboy

It was on drag tires.


User avatar

Devin Swanson   2w ago @hostboy

I must be speaking to a child because I love when you guy's who obviously never drove one or ridden in one but are going to tell me who owns a Trackhawck for the last 10 month's what my Trackhawck will do because you read about it I could care less of your talking about what you THINK you know I'm telling you from an owner's perspective and I absolutely achieved those time's and it's not modified yet and it was not on drag radials, if you live in California I would be happy to meet up with you and your Hellcat that you claim to own and prove it just put your money where your mouth is!!!


User avatar

...  2w ago

The Urus has been clocked at 2.9 seconds 0-60 mph, bone stock, on the street.


User avatar

Devin Swanson   5d ago @...

Let's get something straight that 2.9 o-60 was done by Drag times and that Urus had down pipes and a tune and that's facts..the idiot 2 weeks before showed the stock times to the modified Urus with down pipes and tune and then did the race between the Urus and the Tesla and claimed them to be stock he is known to do that shit to make thing's in his favor..


User avatar

BR2+  5d ago @Devin Swanson

Its still faster then the TrackHawk by a little bit, And, You do know, That if that 3.2s 0-100kph up there was tested by Motortrend....it would have been 0-60mph in 2.8s?...


User avatar

saxy  5d ago @BR2+

According to carwow, the trackhawk fared a bit better than the Urus against the P100D model X


User avatar

BR2+  5d ago @saxy

I mean theres a .3s difference in the 1/4 and a 1mph difference, So i could see it going either way, But i am interested in the results


User avatar

777Balt  8m ago

All you haters just drive the new X5M and then try to imagine how Lamborghini SUV would feel.


User avatar

777Balt  8m ago

 


User avatar

777Balt  8m ago

lol haters gonna hate but even Matt likes it

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRezkRGHfMs[/youtube]


User avatar

FastestLaps  8m ago

This car is a monument for the wealth effect of past decade - a 2.2 ton Lambo SUV wouldn't exist if there was no demand for it - and even more terrifying than the car itself is the fact that there are plenty of buyers queuing up to buy it already.

Fck fuel economy and **** Greenpeace is all I can say lol


User avatar

petrr  8m ago

I have a feeling the next gen X5M/X6M will be just as quick if not quicker and for way less money (considering how beastly the old X6M still is)


User avatar

777Balt  8m ago

I don't understand why people hate so much an SUV which is faster than BMW M4 (a very fast car in real life) both in straight line and track. Urus is great car, would love to have one as a daily driver. A lot of people say that fast SUV doesn't make any sense but drive the new BMW X5M and you will change your mind, it's incredibly fun to drive a very fast SUV and X5M just keeps blowing your mind because it does things you thought an SUV could never do.

You can be fast on straight, corners, you can drive in snow storm or offroad (inb4 someone says X5M and Urus suck at offroading, well of course they are no range rovers but with tires that aren't 100% made for tarmac they aren't that bad), the capabilities fast SUVs have are insane.


User avatar

Tyrone1  8m ago

Lamborghini sold its soul to Audi. Now they realised that Porsche makes loadsa money off ugly ass 4x4s and decided: YES, a supercar manufacturer should sacrifice its exclusivity to sports cars and go for a hideous 4x4 just to pump up some numbers and set a worthless Nurburgring record for SUVs.
I pray Ferrari and Mclaren dont go the same way.
Shame on lamborghini.




User avatar

BR2+  8m ago

It's not bad, But definitely has too much Audi influence, And I think 650bhp is just a bit much , I mean more then the most powerful Huracan?...I also think they tried just a bit too hard, Dont hate it, But it's too much, and at the same time not enough.


User avatar

777Balt  8m ago

0-100 km/h: 3.6 seconds
0-200 km/h: 12.8 seconds
Top speed: 305 km/h (190 mph)


User avatar

cosimo  8m ago

oh scheiße! a sporty version of the touareg! time to milk the milfs of socal and ny first followed by row lol