Lexus RC F specs

Can someone fix the "car type" please? It's not a 4-door sedan. The GS F is one.

1:39.5 (Saschensring, AutoBild)

(Lap times at 1:57)

Can you please add these two lap times

Mendig AFB Circuit lap times

1:56.4 (Christian Menzel)

1:39.5 (Saschensring, AutoBild)

(Lap times at 1:57)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxDJJxQPmsg&t=30s

SportAuto (4/2015):
0-160 kph: 10.2 s
80-120 kph: 4.7,6.1,7.1,11.5,15.6 (4,5,6,7,8)
80-160 kph: 9.1,11.8,15.5,23.7,34.5 (4,5,6,7,8)
Slalom 18m : 68.1 kph

Can you please add 2015 RCF (TVD) Saschenring lap time (RCF vs BMW M4 vs Mustang GT)

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-test-5706398.html

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/bmw-m4-dkg-ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-tvd-vergleich-5740713.html

M4: 1:37.8
RCF: 1:39.5
Mustang GT: 1:40.5

Can you please add 2015 RCF (TVD) Saschenring lap time (RCF vs BMW M4 vs Mustang GT)

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/bmw-m4-dkg-ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-tvd-vergleich-5740713.html

M4: 1:37.8
RCF: 1:39.5
Mustang GT: 1:

While Toyota is over there with their BMW Z4 Coupe, this is the real Supra. Just with a V8. You know, if Toyota swapped in the 3.4 liter V35A twin turbo V6 from the LC500, tuned it to 450 hp, gave it a manual, and swapped it into an RC F with different bodywork, it’d basically be a Supra.

just another overrated performance from lexus toyota!!why they never show the nurburgring lap time?just like the new zupra..

Change lateral acceleration from .92 g to .95 g. Here's my source https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15109103/2015-lexus-rc-f-tested-review/
I figured .92 was too low so i looked around and this was the best skidpad test for a non carbon package rc f i could find

Their quarter mile was also 12.8 which is .1 second slower than the 12.7 seconds that motor trend test got but caranddriver got a faster trap speed at 114mph

[2018 Lexus RC F Carbon] Motor Trend 7/2018 test results [published in "Ultimate Grand Tourers" page on this issue date]:
0-30 mph = 1.6 s
0-40 mph = 2.2 s
0-50 mph = 3.2 s
0-60 mph = 4.1 s
0-70 mph = 5.3 s
0-80 mph = 6.1 s
0-90 mph = 7.3 s
0-100 mph = 8.9 s
1/4-mile = 12.5 s / 114.3 mph
Figure-8 = 22.3 s / 1.02 g
Lateral acceleration = 0.98 g
Willow Springs = 82.98 s

It is technically not a sedan, though it's heavier than the 2008-'14 IS F it's based on.

...FBO?..

Fat Bitches Only? lol

From a roll it loses badly to my FBO E93 .
Was suprised myself .

....You might want to rephrase your comment there.....

The Lexus RC F accelerates like a bat out of hell--the engine is powerful.

With the right set up, it competes head to head with the best on a track. Whether on the road or track, it's a thrill to drive.

Esquire Magazine chose wisely making it the 2015 Biggest Thrill Ride of the Year.

Please add weight: 3,958 lbs

http://www.lexus.com/models/RCF/specifications

0-40 kph: 1.5 s
0-80 kph: 3.5 s
0-100 kph: 4.5 s
0-160 kph: 9.9 s
0-180 kph: 12.3 s
0-200 kph: 15.1 s

by AutoZeitung

http://www.germancarforum.com/attachments/1ffafdd8838f4fa7933413043c9e165c-jpg.325843/

autocar test

dry 1min 15.1s
wet 1min 20.6s

bmw m4

dry 1min 12.5s
wet 1min 25.7s

Wow that's a great 0-60 time, I was hoping we would see a test break into the 3s, Couple things I noticed, how is it that they got 3540lbs on the GT 5.0 when everyone's else Is getting 37-3800lbs? And man that Viper, an old Skool manual and still the awesomest car there.

0-60 mph: 3.9 sec
1/4 mile: 12.7 sec @ 113.0 mph

http://www.porscheboost.com/content.php?5420-Road-and-Track-2015-Performance-Car-of-the-Year-test-figures-Lap-Times-1-4-mile-curb-weight-etc

says you must sign in, any new times for the rcf?

NEW LAPTIMES

http://www.germancarforum.com/threads/evo-audi-rs5-vs-bmw-m4-vs-lexus-rc-f.52758/

474 ps
527 nm
1833 kg
0-60 4,5sec
1/4mile 12,9@110,3 mph
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1409_2015_lexus_rc_f_first_test/

Yet Toyota are doing great in terms of sales and business in general.

I think this is another step in the right direction for Lexus. Lexus and Toyota suffer from an image problem. People don't see them as exciting cars.

Autocar review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87cXsEN42us

The shape is great so i suspect it will be better to look at from all angles in real life. And i hope it has 500hp.

I think id still rather have Dysentery..

The shape is wonderful, I wont deny that, But wether people said they were boring or not, Is no excuse for making an ugly car, I know everything about a car is subjective, but still, But at least its rivals have the looks, M4/5.0/C7/C4S/ all those cars are nice to look at and will most likely cream this thing in every performance category. Still, Im glad they have a N/A 5.9 V8 and not some 3.2L TT V6, God i am so sick of this downsizing bullshite (However i am glad they bought the I6 for the 3 back(Id rather it be N/a like Bmw M/// Use to be..)

I like it, the design is supposed to stand out from the crowd, keep in mind that people criticized Lexus for boring designs, they are only responding to them ( the lambo way)

And we all agree about the NA engine

@Apathy, we probably don't agree on the RC F's styling... ;) but I definitely agree with you on the powerplant. DI turbo motors are cool, and have their place. But I love the fact that Lexus stuck with a N/A V8 motor!