Lexus RC F specs

1:39.5 (Saschensring, AutoBild)

(Lap times at 1:57)

Can you please add these two lap times

Mendig AFB Circuit lap times

1:56.4 (Christian Menzel)

1:39.5 (Saschensring, AutoBild)

(Lap times at 1:57)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxDJJxQPmsg&t=30s

SportAuto (4/2015):
0-160 kph: 10.2 s
80-120 kph: 4.7,6.1,7.1,11.5,15.6 (4,5,6,7,8)
80-160 kph: 9.1,11.8,15.5,23.7,34.5 (4,5,6,7,8)
Slalom 18m : 68.1 kph

Can you please add 2015 RCF (TVD) Saschenring lap time (RCF vs BMW M4 vs Mustang GT)

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-test-5706398.html

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/bmw-m4-dkg-ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-tvd-vergleich-5740713.html

M4: 1:37.8
RCF: 1:39.5
Mustang GT: 1:40.5

Can you please add 2015 RCF (TVD) Saschenring lap time (RCF vs BMW M4 vs Mustang GT)

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/bmw-m4-dkg-ford-mustang-gt-lexus-rc-f-tvd-vergleich-5740713.html

M4: 1:37.8
RCF: 1:39.5
Mustang GT: 1:

While Toyota is over there with their BMW Z4 Coupe, this is the real Supra. Just with a V8. You know, if Toyota swapped in the 3.4 liter V35A twin turbo V6 from the LC500, tuned it to 450 hp, gave it a manual, and swapped it into an RC F with different bodywork, it’d basically be a Supra.

just another overrated performance from lexus toyota!!why they never show the nurburgring lap time?just like the new zupra..

Change lateral acceleration from .92 g to .95 g. Here's my source https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15109103/2015-lexus-rc-f-tested-review/
I figured .92 was too low so i looked around and this was the best skidpad test for a non carbon package rc f i could find

Their quarter mile was also 12.8 which is .1 second slower than the 12.7 seconds that motor trend test got but caranddriver got a faster trap speed at 114mph

[2018 Lexus RC F Carbon] Motor Trend 7/2018 test results [published in "Ultimate Grand Tourers" page on this issue date]:
0-30 mph = 1.6 s
0-40 mph = 2.2 s
0-50 mph = 3.2 s
0-60 mph = 4.1 s
0-70 mph = 5.3 s
0-80 mph = 6.1 s
0-90 mph = 7.3 s
0-100 mph = 8.9 s
1/4-mile = 12.5 s / 114.3 mph
Figure-8 = 22.3 s / 1.02 g
Lateral acceleration = 0.98 g
Willow Springs = 82.98 s

It is technically not a sedan, though it's heavier than the 2008-'14 IS F it's based on.

...FBO?..

Fat Bitches Only? lol

From a roll it loses badly to my FBO E93 .
Was suprised myself .

....You might want to rephrase your comment there.....

The Lexus RC F accelerates like a bat out of hell--the engine is powerful.

With the right set up, it competes head to head with the best on a track. Whether on the road or track, it's a thrill to drive.

Esquire Magazine chose wisely making it the 2015 Biggest Thrill Ride of the Year.

Please add weight: 3,958 lbs

http://www.lexus.com/models/RCF/specifications

0-40 kph: 1.5 s
0-80 kph: 3.5 s
0-100 kph: 4.5 s
0-160 kph: 9.9 s
0-180 kph: 12.3 s
0-200 kph: 15.1 s

by AutoZeitung

http://www.germancarforum.com/attachments/1ffafdd8838f4fa7933413043c9e165c-jpg.325843/

autocar test

dry 1min 15.1s
wet 1min 20.6s

bmw m4

dry 1min 12.5s
wet 1min 25.7s

Wow that's a great 0-60 time, I was hoping we would see a test break into the 3s, Couple things I noticed, how is it that they got 3540lbs on the GT 5.0 when everyone's else Is getting 37-3800lbs? And man that Viper, an old Skool manual and still the awesomest car there.

0-60 mph: 3.9 sec
1/4 mile: 12.7 sec @ 113.0 mph

http://www.porscheboost.com/content.php?5420-Road-and-Track-2015-Performance-Car-of-the-Year-test-figures-Lap-Times-1-4-mile-curb-weight-etc

says you must sign in, any new times for the rcf?

NEW LAPTIMES

http://www.germancarforum.com/threads/evo-audi-rs5-vs-bmw-m4-vs-lexus-rc-f.52758/

474 ps
527 nm
1833 kg
0-60 4,5sec
1/4mile 12,9@110,3 mph
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1409_2015_lexus_rc_f_first_test/

Yet Toyota are doing great in terms of sales and business in general.

I think this is another step in the right direction for Lexus. Lexus and Toyota suffer from an image problem. People don't see them as exciting cars.

Autocar review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87cXsEN42us

The shape is great so i suspect it will be better to look at from all angles in real life. And i hope it has 500hp.

I think id still rather have Dysentery..

The shape is wonderful, I wont deny that, But wether people said they were boring or not, Is no excuse for making an ugly car, I know everything about a car is subjective, but still, But at least its rivals have the looks, M4/5.0/C7/C4S/ all those cars are nice to look at and will most likely cream this thing in every performance category. Still, Im glad they have a N/A 5.9 V8 and not some 3.2L TT V6, God i am so sick of this downsizing bullshite (However i am glad they bought the I6 for the 3 back(Id rather it be N/a like Bmw M/// Use to be..)

I like it, the design is supposed to stand out from the crowd, keep in mind that people criticized Lexus for boring designs, they are only responding to them ( the lambo way)

And we all agree about the NA engine

@Apathy, we probably don't agree on the RC F's styling... ;) but I definitely agree with you on the powerplant. DI turbo motors are cool, and have their place. But I love the fact that Lexus stuck with a N/A V8 motor!

I don't like the way it looks in pictures at all.

In person, I'm still not completely sold on it. The front just stands out too much. It says "LOOK AT ME!!!" You can say the same about other sporty coupes, but the Lexus does it in spades by looking overly bold and somewhat unpleasant (IMO)

It doesn't look very pretty to me at all. It's just flashy (again, IMO).

I will say this though, I'm glad Lexus stuck with the 5.0l V8. The competitor DI turbo cars might have more torque, but there's something cool and visceral about a V8.